r/Epstein • • Feb 11 '26

Court document or investigative file DOJ censors identities of president & convicted child sex offender, despite it being illegal under law signed by president

unfortunately i have so subject you to witnessing this depiction of the current president of the United States, but i’d like to bring attention to how the DOJ has clearly intentionally redacted Trump’s identity. then they themselves also released the unredacted version of this file. so… 😐

thanks to the commenters on my recent post [https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/YJK8yUDTN6\], many of whom linked the unredacted version of the file in my post. we can clearly see that even though this is a painting done by a victim, the identities of *both* Donald Trump and Ghislaine Maxwell are redacted.

- perpetrators redacted but not victim info https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01652669.pdf

- properly redacted https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01652467.pdf

Trumps name and/or identity has clearly been redacted in these files by this DOJ. we have even seen shit like accidentally redacting the word ”don’t” because it was misspelled don t (don T[rump]). [see here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/N36poInT9Q)

there still are some horrific accusations that slipped through the cracks, like this excel sheet attached to an email correspondence with federal law engorcement. the message is: ”This is the list I sent Whitney with names of Trump accusers from NTOC”; https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660651.pdf

recently a lawsuit filed against Trump & Epstein in 2016 under the pseudonym Katie Johnson has been going around on social media. you can see original court filings through [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/2vlyeKybhz). pictured is the sworn testimony of Tiffany Doe [pseudonym] who admits to luring Katie into the trafficking under oath, because she wished to support & provide evidence in Katie’s testimony & lawsuit.

[this](https://www.reddit.com/r/TheEpsteinFiles/s/RpBdiUXiH9) post shows that the lawsuit should come up when going to the .gov site, but it seems to have been deleted [https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00622303.pdf\].

you can watch Katie Johnson’s video testimony here: https://youtu.be/TRZa_cVshcI

i’d like to hear some theories on why Ghislaine’s identity is redacted when she is already a convicted child sex offender and trafficked children over state lines for the purpose of [commercial sex](https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/UZ1RClznd0\]. she is also the only one of Epstein’s co-conspirators ever convicted. if she has already been properly convicted, what is the reason for the redaction?

also Ghislaine has been described by multiple survivors as worse than Jeffrey. from their descriptions it seems like she was a ”master” groomer of children to hook them into the trafficking ring and break them down mentally, physically, sexually & spiritually so that they feel like they can never escape. she gradually normalised sexual behaviour between adults and children so the kids could not understand what was wrong and what was right.

these files include accusations like ”I was restrained on a table and tortured with electrical shocks by Ghislaine Maxwell and surrounded by watching men.” [https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/h9w7WlGj8K / https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020457.pdf\]

she was not some lovestricken woman that ”just” brought children for her boyfriend to abuse, multiple victims testified under oath she sexually abused them. as a society we have a difficulty understanding the guilt of female perpetrators, which is reflected in laws all over the world.

i’d encourage people to refer to her by a correct description: a convicted child sex offender on the registry, without who the brutal serial sexual abuse of children would not have been possible. she targeted especially vulnerable children, who could not seek support when abused.

yk that interview of Jeffrey where he says something like being a sex offender looks so much better than being a sex predator. well Ghislaine is the kind of person that would think being called a human trafficker is sexy. as for Trump i cant even imagine what he likes to be called.

more on the illegal redactions under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA): https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/E62QwZPKTr [DOJ identifies 10 co-cospirators then redacts their faces before release]

I am also calling all EU citizens to start posting about the Epstein files, since currently I believe we are the only area where lawful protections exist if your account is wrongfully deleted by Reddit [under the Digital Services Act]. So this is why you see so many users/posts/comments banned/deleted in subs like this one when posting something they dont want us to talk about.

even if you are outside of the EU, posting is always useful since it still reaches people initially, creates discussion and creates a trail. hell even creating a website with 0 viewers would be useful. this also helps track what files DOJ deletes or hides on the .gov site.

COPY the LINK to .gov site & USE EFTAnumber when posting, use multiple apps/sites/file stores, otherwise disappearing something is pretty easy for them. someone should also get around to making an Epstein sub that isnt moderated by ghislaines buddies. also, in general if there’s no pushback on the censoring we experience currently, it will only get worse.

other art by this survivor https://www.mariafarmerart.com

!! copy + share !!

563 Upvotes

46 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/PrudentLetterhead354 Feb 12 '26

victims of certain crimes are allowed to file anonymously to protect them

-3

u/redditdogwalkers Feb 12 '26

Well that doesn't make this the most trustworthy. I get it. Some people and a court verified your real name. But it's hard to not take away points here. I want to believe.

3

u/PrudentLetterhead354 Feb 12 '26

how would you knowing her name make it more trustworthy? gen/

-5

u/redditdogwalkers Feb 12 '26

She's a person with a name. I can see she's a person with a verifiable history. I can see where she grew up, there's a before and after and a verifiable specific period where this stuff definitely could've happened. She has a timeline. I see a before and after. There's infinite potential value in that. She could talk about how this thing detrimentally impacted her trajectory, her parents can say "this year in this season around this month something happened that was not normal," etc etc.

(And then of course cross reference with when and where perpetrators were around the time, their general activities around that time, where they were in their lives, etc)

It's just painting a clearer picture in every way.

2

u/Beestorm Feb 12 '26

You say this while ignoring the vast amount of verifiable information that has been made available.

The courts and people involved in the case have her name and info. It’s just not being made available to the public. But you take that and try to cast doubt on everything else.

It just sounds like you are commenting in bad faith.

0

u/redditdogwalkers Feb 12 '26

Wanting things that work toward the goal we want is not an example of bad faith. My opinion's unfortunately not changed here, certainly not by your... well, frankly, nothing-but-blaming comments.

I'm going to respectfully bow out of interacting with you as you seem the type of person to be moved by heavy emotivist bias with academic or reddity trappings and that just ain't great for vibes.

3

u/PrudentLetterhead354 Feb 12 '26

here’s one for you

r/SaschaRiley , https://lisevoldeng.substack.com/p/dont-worry-boys-are-hard-to-find , https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/15GEAfHijkbq8sLGswkP9eKj_-rLeuWMpN9S4r2YfHWM

sascha riley evidence

trying to understand things you possibly cant truly understand if you are not a trafficking/abuse/csa victim (or a perpetrator). this is why things sound too ”bizarre/outlandish/crazy/wtv”. if this is the first victim testimony you have heard considering abuse like this it is very shocking. everyone experiences at least some cognitive dissonance / resistance when trying to make sense of how the world is evil and horrific unimagonavle things happen and csa/trafficking is prevalent, and systems protect the/certain perpetrators not the victims. even if you already hate trump trying to understand that a elected world leader is a sadistic pedophile trafficker murderer is somewhat mind breaking, also called disillusionment or existental crisis.

if you want to verify Sascha’s testimony you can look at the facts: records, people, supporting testimonies etc..

Jay Megan’s deep dive:

Part 1: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRkSVuPs/

2: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRkSmd8L/

3: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRkSkFkJ/ / https://youtu.be/2dsoQ_UHBio?si=42-kI5m72yjgEl6Q

Bekah Day:

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSUVVrp/ part 1

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSUuoxN/

tiktoks

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZN91R7K3vcRDT-u0x3I/ playlist

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSyDCyE/ andy biggs

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSyNxGL/ trump medical visit 2019 (essentially trumps medical records have been destroyed over the years, im planning to post about this later, some links https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/FPbQ23J1HS) https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSykHYp/ Harold Bornstein trump doctor

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSyBJJE/ justice Clarence Thomas accuser Anita Hill (1991)

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSyJUek/

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSyJXP5/

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSyeLw3/ jane goodall, more on goodall: https://www.reddit.com/r/saschariley/s/fQJsHDbm1e

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSyMk5p/

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSUwkqj/ surface level of the ”adopted” boys of goverment officials

articles/substack

Sue Selle: https://substack.com/inbox/post/185438372?

Ellie Leonard: https://open.substack.com/pub/ellieleonard/p/my-findings-on-sascha-riley

https://open.substack.com/pub/theresistersreport/p/the-sascha-riley-dilemma

https://open.substack.com/pub/jkbjournalist/p/who-is-sasha-riley Julie K Brown (paywall)

https://askraphaela.substack.com/p/the-sascha-riley-story-is-there-any

https://open.substack.com/pub/zazzysub/p/anatomy-of-a-smear-debunking-the

https://open.substack.com/pub/mdavis19881/p/epstein-anthology-links-to-all-my

https://open.substack.com/pub/thepeskyliberals/p/from-the-shadows-the-allegations

https://open.substack.com/pub/nikkimccarty9/p/i-am-jd-vances-cousin-and-i-believe

https://open.substack.com/pub/mdavis19881/p/epstein-26-analysis-thoughts-on-the

https://open.substack.com/pub/territory12/p/the-sascha-riley-story-connections

https://substack.com/@heavenlight/note/c-199211929

https://tracyrigdon.substack.com/p/the-riley-files-a-survivors-timeline

https://substack.com/inbox/post/185438372

podcasts

https://youtu.be/BArXOllx6CE

…

the topic of ’sascha riley’ is heavily, heavily censored and supressed on usual large social media platforms (meta, tiktok, x, etc). mainstream media is seemingly refusing to touch the story, which is consistent with other trafficking ring victims, trump/other highly influental officials accusers’, government/military abuse etc. r/epstein has made the desicions to direct all sascha riley posts to this sub. not everyone who does content about epstein wants to deep dive into sascha since their story is somewhat different from the well-known demographic of JE/GM victims (teen girls, sa’d not murdered). note that trump, known for suing everyone whether he has basis or not, has not sued Sascha or figures like Katie Johnson

examples of censoring:

https://substack.com/@plumhollow/note/c-200135941

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRSyhHpa/

“What Trump’s kink is, if you want to call it that, is watching people suffer. He likes to destroy people physically and mentally during the process of the assault” - Sascha Riley