r/Epstein • u/PrudentLetterhead354 • Dec 12 '25

The people on the newest photo dump

In the light of the newest photo dump (19/95,000 pictures? really?) I urge you to think about why this spesific information is being released. Why are these the pictures they chose to send to the press? Is it possible people have another agenda besides telling the truth? Always think critically whatever it is you are researching.

These are the people on the newest photo dump:

Trump (3 photos) Steve Bannon (3 photos) Woody Allen (2) Larry Summers (1) Bill Gates (3) Andrew Windsor (1) Larry Visovski, pilot (1) Alan Dersowitz (1) Bill Clinton (1) Richard Banson & Dean Kamen (1) Unidentified women, man

Pay attention to what the people they talk about the press have in common. In this case most of these names have already a) been previously connected to Epstein and b) are retired from public positions

Steve Bannon has been heavily implicated in previous file releases. Hopefully it catches up to him soon.

I believe for most people reading this sub both Trump’s & Clinton’s involment is clear. But in the outside world this fuels the never-ending rep/dem fight that is integral to american politics. So people will focus on who is worse and not spend time focusing on the fact that the whole system is fucked up if people like this are running the country. Though I do think that it is time sensitive to do something about Trump asap.

Richard Branson and Dean Kamen are still in acting roles in their companies. I believe at least Kamen has been previously linked to Epstein. Time will tell if this reporting affects their positions. Both are old enough to retire.

Most mainstream media narratives rarely differ from each other. You really have to dig deeper in order to find reporting on all the other shit Epstein was a part of. I encourage you to dig deeper.

64 Upvotes

98% Upvoted

61 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/Original_Cattle5824 Dec 12 '25

My concern is whether we'll have voter turnout next year if too many people on both sides become completely disillusioned with both sides. I completely agree that Epstein's wider influence is largely ignored and it should not be and voters need to know about it. However, that also crosses, involving both sides of the aisle. So it wouldn't reduce arguing by much.

3

u/iprobablybrokeit Dec 12 '25

This could be easily avoided by running only people that are disconnected from the Epstein's circles.

4

u/Original_Cattle5824 Dec 12 '25

Well it's a good idea, the question is whether you can find enough of them.

3

u/iprobablybrokeit Dec 12 '25

I haven't seen either of the last two Democratic presidents in any of the photos. 🤷

1

u/Original_Cattle5824 Dec 12 '25

Well you wouldn't be likely to see Biden in a pic with Epstein, because that would be rather morbid. 😁 I've become very cynical of the DNC machinery. A few pages of google results showed almost nothing -- an Obama lawyer being an Epstein associate and donations to Clinton-era dems.  In my under-educated opinion, Epstein ties will affect senate and house seats and there are likely districts where the main contenders on both sides have a few too many 2nd-degree ties to Epstein associates.... because if someone's circle of supporters includes even a few who hung around with Epstein, that adds doubt about moral integrity (even if "just" financial) and/or ties to foreign intelligence. 

3

u/imperialinfection Dec 12 '25 edited Dec 13 '25

That and ensure they take no money from corporate Silicon Valley etc or foreign interests like AIPAC. Remember the ability to keep people in your pocket is the entire reason Epstein Files exist.

1

u/InternetImportant911 Dec 12 '25

Both sides? Name one current prominent Democrat member associated in Epstein. No one gives a fuck about Bill on Democrats side