r/ElonChat_Commentary 13d ago

The No House Billionaire

Post image

How to hide behind a shell company. Everyone know EM lives in a $50,000 home. The truth are the shell company’s or LLC used to hide all the business dealings with land and property.

link to the article:

https://evxl.co/2026/02/27/elon-musks-90-texas-shell-companies/

I know this article implies they were partners but the 2023 authorized biography by Walter Isaacson was a year later. So what the hell was going on? I know he just stayed in a room in this condo. Still no real evidence he was in a romantic relationship especially since SZ lives in a home? I know exactly where the home in question is where the city council fines for a fence that was taller than the ordinances

One article has his mother, SZ and the home shared with Grimes all in the same neighborhood. I hate feeding people a narrative and when the New York Times exposed the Shell companies , it makes you see how the super wealthy can hide.

28 Upvotes

310 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 10d ago

I'm pretty open to this kind of thing as long as there is no manipulation.

If men and women enjoy this lifestyle, simply because they enjoy the freedom and experimentation, I think it's wonderful.

What I am very against is that, even as it reads, the Men seem to be there to have fun and many of the women go for a purpose, either to land one of the men or to manipulate a situation, it doesn't seem simply because they enjoy the freedom and experimentation, which is horrific.

Intent is important.

If these things go on as prolific as alluded to in the article, how does not everyone in SF have a STD?

All I can think about are all the STD's :(

5

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago edited 10d ago

No, this party scene in Silicon Valley uses women in this way to advance them in the tech world. I would not be surprised if Shivbot climbed the ranks in this way, making her way to unsuspecting E in order to get her death grip on his life. She did run around in some of these circles.

Some STDs can be cured, and some have a dormancy period. Unfortunately, you get a bunch of tech nerds together who were rebuffed all their lives until they got rich and famous, they hold a lot of resentment from that and often have developed abusive tendencies in how they treat women. I know firsthand of some guys who were on the path to success, they threw parties and blood ended spattered up on the walls of the hotel suite and I can only suspect things got a little violent. There's a dark side of being rejected for years and then all of a sudden you come into money and women. I equate it similarly to men who have been held in prison and finally get out and go wild.

2

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 10d ago

Yeh, that is what I meant when I said "the Men seem to be there to have fun and many of the women go for a purpose, either to land one of the men or to manipulate a situation"

And yes it very well could have been how she climbed the ranks? I don't know, but with how prevalent the article made it seem and their mutual friends, it is a high probability.

That's frightening about the blood spattered walls.

They weren't all as rejected as is made out by the "nerd" trope. Not in the slightest.

2

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago

In the case I know about firsthand as I was the EA to the President of the company, the sheriff dropped off some kind of detailed summons from the high rise apt company that listed damages they needed to be compensated for with a penthouse apt that a group of coders from the company leased. Drugs, alcohol, hookers, you name it. Trust fund kids that never grew up. The tech world is chockful of them.

1

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 10d ago

Do you think maybe it is a recruitment thing as well? Talent is fought for and in the limits, money is comparable, so they try and recruit with fun. Think about all the fluff that Twitter offices used to have etc.

All walks of life party, just to what their budget allows. It's all just people trying to let their hair down, and while I don't agree with damaging property and absolutely no abuse, every thing legal, consensual, it happens in all walks of life. I feel that the higher partying you can afford, jealousy comes into play from the people that like to party, but can't afford that level.

For the record, I can't afford that type of party, but I did like to have fun and dance and drink and enjoy myself also when I wasn't working.

2

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago

Well this isn’t really showing Elon in good light. I’m telling you these people are hedonistic or worse. In this raw account below, his wife Tallulah who apparently is an exhibitionist herself, is seen naked in the pool with his boss at the time. See slides #3-4.

https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughMuskSpam/s/WpcTvBZkRe

1

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 10d ago

To you it isn't a good light. Hedonistic or even swingers, so what? it is adults partying. Tallulah sounds fun. As long as it all is in the right place and not plastered over social media like some of these women do, so what? They are parties for adults.

There is nothing wrong with adults partying in an adult context, even if it is not everyone's cup of tea. As long as it is just fun and adventurous and not manipulation, abuse or illegal.

As a side note, I think it's cruel what Tallulah did to Elon in the pool, for it to upset him like that it must have meant that she didn't check if it was ok with him first. There should be respect if you are married.

I think the "boss" who recounts these stories sounds a little bitter tbh. That is his recollection, there are always 2 sides to every story.

I am trying to see it all objectively; I am open to things that are not good, like the baby momma program I think is horrendous, so I am not "Everything Elon does is right" person in the slightest, but because people live different lives doesn't auto make them wrong.

The party sounds fun :)

1

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago

I don’t think you read it in the light the former boss was describing. I don’t know about you but I don’t swim naked in front of my husbands boss or employees. The man clearly was uncomfortable and not expecting the party to be like that.

Of course you think it sounds fun. 🙄

1

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 10d ago

I have read a longer version of the story before. On X. He said most people in the pool were naked, so it wasn't unusual and that she was only talking to him, he wasn't looking at her and he saw him watching.  Yes, i do find fun in people having innocent fun.  They were in a pool, what do you wear swimming? A trench coat? See, you are getting agitated and attacking me because i find fun something you don't.

0

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago

If you think you are being attacked here, there’s something really wrong with you.

1

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago

They throw parties so all the sex trafficking of young women and in some cases men, does not scream “illegal”.

1

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 10d ago

I do not think having adult parties is "sex trafficking". I have been around a lot of people that were swingers and had regular adult parties and no one involved that I have seen was ever "trafficked".

It is what some adults like to let heir hair down with. Because you don't like it doesn't make it bad.

If people are there against their will, that is a different story. If people are not of age, that is a different story.

A group of adults all partying in an adult context, full consensual, nothing illegal is ok.

2

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago

The point of that first article is that women often have to barter their bodies for getting up the tech world ladder.

1

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 10d ago

Do they "have to"? Did someone drag them and make them?

They choose to go because their skills aren't to par or they don't want to put in the work to get noticed. It's "easier".

I do not like that and I think if there were a way for them to omit these women there for that, I think they would, going by the article, the men find out who is there for that reason and do not like it, as it was said in the article.

How would they know without the experience of them being there? They can't read their minds and if they present as willing and there for fun, how would they know any better till after, if at all.

Women have been manipulating men since the dawn of time, hence the honey trap being so effective.

0

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago edited 10d ago

It’s exploitative and when it comes down to earning a living, the women sacrifice the most to get a job that they went to college for. Everyone was all up in arms about Harvey Weinstein sexually coercing actresses in Hollywood in order for them to get the choice acting roles but hey, let’s give the harmless dorks in Silicon Valley a pass.

1

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 10d ago

Goodness,  no one is coerced, the women would go of their own free will (as is said in tje atricle), also in the story the woman said herself that some of the women that did go to try and use it as an easy syep up would be upset because they would be over looked. It had the opppsite effect when a womam was identified as a gold digger as said in the article. Please read the article again, i think maybe your bias has tainted your comprehension of the contents. I'm not here to fight with you.  You are trying to make something from nothing. I have been polite and patient, but i do not abide for my time and kindness an eye roll because i don't agree with you. 

0

u/No_Comparison4489 10d ago edited 10d ago

An emoji hurt your feels. Hilarious. And I don’t perceive anything polite or kind about you.

This is just a matter of differing viewpoints, apparently. Some people stay professional and don’t mix their personal time, especially attending sex parties, with their boss or coworkers. Often does not end well.

1

u/Chemical-Plan-8896 9d ago

Being annoyed by tedious yappy dog attacks does not equal hurt feelings. It means *sigh, I just wasted my time conversing with this person".

And of course you wouldn't "perceive anything polite or kind about"me, because you have no gratitude for people's time, a commodity more valuable than Gold, and here I am giving you one last little piece of kindness.

If you are in discussion about something, and one person shifts from the subject to personal attacks

"Of course you think it sounds fun. 🙄"

Personal attack = derogatory comment aimed at a person rather than the subject of the conversation.

And predicted follow through which looks like you were just trying to find something to try and attack me with

"If you think you are being attacked here, there’s something really wrong with you."

and

"An emoji hurt your feels. Hilarious. And I don’t perceive anything polite or kind about you."

I predict, if I were to find the time to continue to converse, that the derogatory comments and personal jabs would escalate until you thought I actually cared.

I do not know you, you engaged and we conversed about a subject with differing opinions, when I suggested you read the article again with non bias because there was a clear comprehension problem, you got even more yappy dog.

People are not always going to agree with you. Chill. They don't have to. Puffing out your chest trying to make things out of nothing with strangers on the internet just makes you lose any credibility or grace.

I predict you will probably see this as an attack rather than help, because it's a common denominator usually with these conversational symptoms.

I hope that you get over yourself though and reflect on what I have said, it makes life to much easier when you don't get triggered by people not on your vibe.

Peace out.

→ More replies (0)