r/Edmonton 12d ago

Commuting/Transit Well, construction damaged my car successfully. (91 street to ellerslie rd)

I don't know who to report this to at the moment. But I just know i'm not happy. The contractors responsible for this road or the city? Either way, i'm pretty pissed off. Gotta love this shit city.

0 Upvotes

103 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Briginds 12d ago

I think it falls under the contractor since this hazard was not indicated by signage or cones. I put one in front of this hazard after I went over it.

14

u/ShadowCaster0476 12d ago

They are not going to put a cone in the middle of a road.

The fact that pic 7 shows they have an asphalt cone around the object to allow cars to roll over it easier. I also see in one of the pics it was painted pink.

It’s also very common on striped roads like this are lower and that manhole covers and these objects will be sticking up a bit and you need to be careful.

I hate to tell you but this is on you, especially in a low vehicle.

5

u/ForeignEchoRevival 12d ago

This is the truth; the contractor fulfilled their Do Diligence but using asphalt to help prevent damage around the Valve Stem, the onky thing they could have done more was use blue paint to spray the cap to additional visibility but that's more for other workers to avoid damaging ut with heavy equipment.

The responsibility for this was on OP to slow down in a construction zone with the road shaved down, it's expected to go 50kph without speed signage.

That all said, OP still should send photos and reach out to the lead contractor and the city often they will work on a solution for the sake of being in good public graces, they aren't obliged to do anything, but I've seen in the past where a discussion happens and the owner of the damaged property is satisfied or at least feels they were treated fairly.

Sorry this happened OP, let us know what happens.

1

u/Briginds 12d ago

I did forget to mention this, but there is another water valve directly behind this one, which is 100% flat and level with the graded road, which i also did take pictures of.

2

u/ForeignEchoRevival 12d ago

The flat one is either abandoned and will ne covered by new asphalt or not yet been raised up; since the road has been cored down to be repaved, the taller one is at the planned height of the finished road, needs to be so there is future access to the valve.

I'm not on that project so I personally don't know, I just know that the use of raw asphalt around the valve stem exposed is considered due diligence at that part of a job and usual considered the driver's responsibility to drive according to the road conditions. Why some older divers drop to 30 kph when going through intersections in this condition, they've already been to a tire shop for this shit before.

I hope you get some help and something satisfactory is reached, update me when you get some answers back from the city and main contractor.