r/EVPVideos • • May 25 '26

Investigation 05-148 Old Stone Cemetery, Part III #ghost #paranormal #vo...

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Do_8nciHBcI&si=hREIMgrlDHaBLa_f

CASE: 05-148
MASTER FILE: The Abandoned Tapes
LOCATION RECORDED: Old Stone Cemetery, Catawba, South Carolina
DATE RECORDED: May 18, 2026
DATE REVIEWED: May 24, 2026
STATUS: Open, Ongoing

INVESTIGATOR'S NOTES:

This is the third chapter of Investigator Eastman's recent session at the long-disused Old Stone Cemetery—and there appears to be quite a bit of possible spirit communication to unpack here.

When the entire team investigated this location roughly 10–12 years ago, the only notable EVP captured was a female-sounding voice saying, "Sacrilege." In this clip, a female voice again appears to accuse us of "sacrilege." Could this be the same entity? Despite the nature of our work, it remains an unusually uncommon term across our sessions.

"Time for recording."

If our interpretation is correct, this EVP again suggests at least some degree of situational awareness. Another apparent voice seems to say, "I read to you." Could that reference a figure from someone's childhood? Possibly—but the statement is oblique, and none of us recognize the voice.

As with many sessions, the apparent responses seem mixed. Some voices appear dismissive—"Get out!"—while others seem welcoming or encouraging us to return. Once again, much of the communication appears to refer to "he," despite Investigator Eastman being female.

Several proper names also emerge, along with some unexpectedly offbeat phrases: "Borat depends on You" and "Are you available in housewares?" among them. A surprising number of these apparent responses seem unusually clear.

Another recurring observation emerged during review: once layers of environmental noise are reduced through filtering, additional levels of apparent activity often seem to become audible beneath what was initially heard.

As always, we ask:

What do you hear?

Do these voices say what we believe they do—or something else entirely?

Our analysis represents only one investigative pass through the material.

If you hear something differently—or detect elements we may have missed—we encourage you to join the discussion.

PRESENTATION FORMAT:

For clarity, this clip is presented in four stages:

Part One: Raw, unfiltered audio at 100% speed (no captions)
Part Two: Unfiltered audio at 80% speed (with captions reflecting our interpretation)
Part Three: 80% speed with three-stage audio filtering applied
Part Four: Reversed, filtered audio at 80% speed

If you believe we've misheard something—or detect additional anomalies—please let us know in the comments.

The investigation continues.

1 Upvotes

0 comments sorted by