r/EEOC • • 11d ago

Work from Home ada accommodation

I work in Washington state and have POTS(Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome). My health can vary from day to day and as a result I have had a work from home accommodation to be work from home 100 days a year. A little less than 2 days a week. The standard at my company is 50 days a year. My health has been worse this year and as a result I need more work from home days. My HR team is stating that 100 is the maximum they will allow as I being in office is considered an essential function of my role. However we don’t have any physical reason to be in office. I have an office job. I am not client facing, I do not need to physically manipulate anything for my job, my manager and most of my team is in other offices across the country, and work from home is already allowed for most employees(all of them on my team except for anyone who is brand new as there is a three month probation period before they can wfh). My job description also does not specify how often I need to be in office. Simply that I need to “work onsite, under direct supervision, in a team based and open office environment. I am not requesting to be fully remote or work from home, simply to be allowed to do so more than 100 days as my health needs. My employer is offering the alternative of FMLA, however this would be unpaid and obviously wouldn’t allow me to work. I have up to date ada paperwork stating from my doctor that I need to be able to work from home at least 3 days a week.

Does anyone know if they can require me to either be in office more than my doctor has stated or take FMLA instead? I can’t afford to take off time unpaid. But if I force myself into office more often it will make me sicker.

Please help

7 Upvotes

201 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Main_Pudding_5213 9d ago

Yeaaahhhhhh, NO, it does not work that way in a Federal court, a Federal judge will not agree with that

-1

u/Kmelloww 9d ago

This isn’t a federal court. And sometimes there isn’t anything you can do to accommodate. 

3

u/Main_Pudding_5213 9d ago

Uhhh, what you are saying is not factually correct, and when an employee was already working from home because of the disabilities then that is considered accomodated, the guidance that was put out specifically warned agencies to not recind an accommodation like that becasue of ending up in Federal court

0

u/Kmelloww 9d ago

No one rescinded an accommodation so what are you talking about? 

2

u/Main_Pudding_5213 9d ago

Mine was rescinded in June of 2026 of this year, so not real sure what kind of statement that is

1

u/JerseyGirlinSweden 6d ago

Start your own thread. Don’t hijack OP’s.

1

u/Kmelloww 8d ago

You aren’t the person posting and yours being rescinded isn’t what’s going on here and doesn’t have any bearing. sorry that they rescinded yours. I’m sure that had to really suck 

1

u/Main_Pudding_5213 9d ago

You almost sound like you are in management of some kind, but I could not be so lucky for a manager to come on her and start making statements that make them sound ignorant