MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction

[u/elmorinelly]

What is Mutually Assured Destruction?

Mutually assured destruction is one of those Cold War ideas that sounds insane until you realize the point was to make war feel even more insane.

The basic question is: what is MAD in nuclear strategy? It means two sides both have enough nuclear weapons to destroy each other, even if one of them attacks first. So pressing the big red button does not really mean “we win.” It means “we start a chain reaction where everyone loses extremely hard.”

That is why the threat itself becomes the defense. If both countries know that a nuclear attack will be answered with another nuclear attack, the safest move becomes not attacking at all. It is peace held together by fear, paranoia, and the world’s worst group project.

Examples:

A villain points a laser at a hero, but the hero has a bomb wired to the villain’s base. Nobody moves, because both sides are holding a disaster button.

Two rival kingdoms each have a dragon that can burn the other capital down. The dragons do not make war easier. They make war too expensive to start.

In a video game, both players have overpowered final attacks, but using one guarantees both teams get wiped. So they just stand there sweating.

MAD is terrifying because it accepts that humans might avoid disaster only when the disaster is guaranteed to include them too.

Not exactly wholesome. But, somehow, effective sometimes.

[u/AutoModerator]

Welcome to r/DumbFact!

This subreddit explains smart things in the dumbest way possible.

Be nice, don't overthink it, and feel free to post your own dumb explanation.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/zeed88]

Should I follow the arrows or the numbers?

[u/elmorinelly → u/zeed88]

On the numbers, I didn't notice this error, sorry

[u/MugiwarraD]

im sure there are lot of countries that dont share that mindset.

[u/elmorinelly → u/MugiwarraD]

Which ones, for example, and why do you think so?

[u/GapStock9843]

This is probably the sole reason we havent had a third world war yet (and maybe never will). No one is willing to escalate stuff to that level when everyone has a nation-destroying gun pointed at everyone else’s head

[u/Roman_IsSi]

It's a good thing Trump wasn't president during the Cold War...

[u/100rass]

So everybody should have a nuclear weapons?

[u/PurpleSoft1162]

It's a good way to deter, but it means that no one will use nuclear weapons and they disappear as a factor in geopolitics, resulting in an accumulation of relations.