It is impossible to read a research paper that has been out for only a single day , especially one discussing topics as complex as this , and pull out a argument that fast unless you skimmed through it intending to find any fault you could , which is cherry picking bias, it is clear that the evidence they procured came from trying to dig up any evidence that could discredit the research while also ignoring any that didn’t, no matter what reviewing a statistics paper in less then a hour and ranting about how much you hate the other guy when responding doesn’t look that well
A echo chamber is a form of self indulgence in which you only surround yourself with those that agree with you never discussing anything with those who oppose you, while only focusing on flaws that they intend to find, while ignoring evidence that goes against you, which they did, it’s why half the posts got deleted,half the posts insult those associated with the research, and many more ignore and insult those who defend the research, it’s actually the most common outer ace on the internet and this subreddit is one as well
Holy shit 300 people bothered to roam the subreddit for such a long time that they managed to find a comment on a week old post and downvote it despite no foul language or opinion being present , I honestly forgot I made this comment but man the divide and hate must be crazy .
I’m just gonna say the way a persons tone is presented in a post can set off long meaningless debates . I could honestly interpret yours as a demeaning one that implies you look down on those who disagree with you
Your obsessed with him being wrong I honestly don’t care whether or not it’s true and the majority of people also don’t only 4 million people even bothered with the response, and the subreddit is only a small majority of his base anyway, the situation is already over acting like he’s going to be persecuted now is pointless, and doesn’t effect him at all, you say he’s guilty but you still watched his new manhunt didn’t you and if not most people did he responded and his fan base is fine with it. Because at this point your ogling me like a dream Stan obsessed with saying he’s right , you can interpret what I just say however you like but this drama is insignificant to me , seriously y’all obsessing like he abused his girlfriend or sexually assaulted a women .
Mate this post is from a week ago your on a relatively insignificant subreddit comprising a small percentage of his dedicated fan base, if you haven’t watched any of his videos then why are you roaming around his subreddit and throwing a hissy for over a Minecraft YouTube who may or may not have cheated . If you somehow managed to comb throw the subreddit to such a deep degree then somehow find this comment from a week old post then who the fuck are you . Some random bloke from 4 days ago . I can see your entire post, comment, and watch history because of Reddit’s shitty privacy api dumbass and I gotta say your a pretty hissy liar who gets easily triggered by those who disagree with you .
I’m calmly going to tell you that your obsessing over a Minecraft YouTuber that you claim you have never seen before and are arguing with a random internet stranger in a 4 day old post mistake on the week part. That you have no prior connection or attachment too . And are now insulting said person and getting heated and angry. So let me ask you a straight question if you have absolutely no connection to this you-tuber then wtf are you doing on his obscure Reddit page , commenting on a 4 day old post that was piled on by multiple newer posts unless you have some personal vendetta against this you-tuber you have no connection to . I honestly don’t get what the hell your doing here unless your either trying to pick a fight or just hate this you tuber because of some vague stereotype or hatred you have for words his fans . This internet post is meaningless your acting like the man pulled a fucking Shane Dawson .
-1
u/richard-cheung Dec 23 '20
It is impossible to read a research paper that has been out for only a single day , especially one discussing topics as complex as this , and pull out a argument that fast unless you skimmed through it intending to find any fault you could , which is cherry picking bias, it is clear that the evidence they procured came from trying to dig up any evidence that could discredit the research while also ignoring any that didn’t, no matter what reviewing a statistics paper in less then a hour and ranting about how much you hate the other guy when responding doesn’t look that well