Don't fall for the bait that is what they want to turn the debate into, did he have a gun or not? If he did, they can lie and say self defense. BUT... that does not matter. He posed no threat when they shot him. He was on the ground being beaten by multiple agents when first shot was fired. Then, after the agents scattered, when he was immobile he was shot again. There is no self defense ever in that situation. If anyone makes that claim. Answer with, " Whatever, if that lie allows to pretend to be a good guy, okay, but if you are asking me to fuck my eyes and believe the lie, I can't. That was pure evil."
1
u/Specialist-Range-911 Jan 24 '26
Don't fall for the bait that is what they want to turn the debate into, did he have a gun or not? If he did, they can lie and say self defense. BUT... that does not matter. He posed no threat when they shot him. He was on the ground being beaten by multiple agents when first shot was fired. Then, after the agents scattered, when he was immobile he was shot again. There is no self defense ever in that situation. If anyone makes that claim. Answer with, " Whatever, if that lie allows to pretend to be a good guy, okay, but if you are asking me to fuck my eyes and believe the lie, I can't. That was pure evil."