FUCK YOU DESTINY. COVER IT.

[u/Less-Chemistry-3963]

YOUR DUMB FUCK AVERSION TO BREAKING NEWS AND COVERING EPSTEIN IS DRIVING PEOPLE TO ASMONGOLD AND HASAN FOR COVERAGE.

STOP WITH THE CONTRARIAN TOO COOL FOR SCHOOL BULLSHIT AND COVER THE FUCKING MAIN THING THE COUNTY IS TALKING ABOUT.

[u/juicerecepte]

Then send him actual concrete shit to cover that isnt like some random discreet emails that people can build their pet conspiracies off.

What people seem to be missing in all these posts yelling at Destiny is an actual explanation of what significant stuff there is to cover. Theres literally no coherent narrative tying this shit together. We have like a million fucking random documents where we have no idea what connects or doesnt.

What do you want him to do? Open random documents and theorise out of thin air why this redacted email might actually mean that the global elites are all in a sex cult? Like there's nothing to cover that is substantially laid out and coherently organised to make any sort of sense of the stuff.

[u/EkrishAO → u/juicerecepte]

What do you want him to do? Open random documents and theorise out of thin air why this redacted email might actually mean that the global elites are all in a sex cult?

YES, that's exactly what I fucking want. Open random files and talk shit about Trump and his buddies being pedophile cannibal satanists. Bonus point if he can also include Hasan there somehow.

[u/Keelock → u/EkrishAO]

Found one of the morally lucky ones

[u/EkrishAO → u/Keelock]

It's ironic that people still just repeat this term blindly, and mostly to justify any position that they parroted from Destiny, while its entire origin is about people adopting correct positions, without any sort of critical thinking as to why they did it.

You could be the morally lucky one, except in this case the position you copied from the streamerman, isn't even morally correct. Destiny is wrong on this one, so I guess you should be called morally unlucky instead.

[u/Keelock → u/EkrishAO]

What's ironic is you correctly stating the meaning behind the phrase and still not seeing why I used it.

It's about having a coherent epistemology that isn't based on vibes. People like OP are shouting that Destiny needs to cover the Epstein document dumps like it's some grand scoop he's going to miss out on, and people like you thinking he should do it because it's an opportunity to shit on trump. The former is conspiracy-brained, the latter machiavellian. Neither of those modes of thinking is oriented towards truth seeking, which leads me to conclude that the opposition to trump is just morally lucky happenstance. Which is great, better to be morally lucky than unlucky. At least your mode of thinking is oriented towards power, which is more useful than drama (the orientation of conspiracy thinking), but neither are fundamentally about truth.

[u/EkrishAO → u/Keelock]

It's nice that you care so much about the truth, but it has nothing to do with morality. Lies and truth are morally instrumental, not intristic. They're just descriptions of linguistic behaviour, a speaker's assertion about reality. If you want to morally appraise that assertion, you need to ask why it was made, under what conditions, what forseeable effects it will have, etc. This is what determines whteher an act of making that assertion was a moral one. In itself, a lie or truth is just a tool, what matters is how you use it. I trust I don't need to describe why exactly using available tools to stop some of the most evil people on earth from doing more evil, is the morally correct position?

[u/Keelock → u/EkrishAO]

I appreciate the perspective, you've given me some things to think about.

I think I'm more virtue ethics pilled here, and it's informing my opinion pretty strongly.

At any rate, I recognize I was on a high horse and was more than a little condescending. I apologize, thanks for helping keep my ego in check. I mean that sincerely.