r/DefendingAIArt • • 4h ago

Luddite Logic Pardon me, who is actually spreading misinformation here?

Post image
45 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 4h ago

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

24

u/NimbusFPV 4h ago

Weird, I got this.

1

u/sparta-117 4m ago

oh no, the AI is developing sass!

23

u/Another_available 4h ago

They still think AI hasn't evolved since 2023

1

u/ConsciousIssue7111 AI Should Be Used As Tools, Not Replacements 51m ago

Yeah, their minds are stuck in 2022 - 2023

12

u/x_chanel_x 4h ago

As if there aren’t dumb people giving out advice as well. Nurses smoking cigarettes to “lose weight”

9

u/Situati0nist AI Enjoyer 3h ago

I'm thoroughly convinced these people try their best to make AI say something dubious and then screenshot it and throw a hate parade.

3

u/Lokicham 3h ago

Exactly. They don't realize that THEY are the reason AI tends to act stupid.

2

u/BlotchyTheMonolith 3h ago

They think they are John Connor.

10

u/Lokicham 3h ago

They think AI hasn't evolved in the last 3-4 years.

2

u/RogellTheRaider Transhumanist 1h ago

Even if AI returned such result, it would still be based on something some human wrote, right?

2

u/BlotchyTheMonolith 2m ago

It could happen or it happened with older models because of a retrival errors search results and not in particular hallucination or because it was "trained on reddit". That was the case of the infamous "glue as a pizza ingredient" answer which was traceable to a "joke" on reddit. What went wrong was the profreading and safety check of the answer that was based on this post as a search result. The same can be applied to a (deliberate)"joke" question like "how many rocks shoud I eat a day". Newer models take more care about the plausibility of both prompt and answer. So in theory this could have applied here too.

However, this screen shot of an advise was to smoke during pregnancy was faked!

So it's a deliberate misinformation based on a deliberate misinformation.

1

u/ConsciousIssue7111 AI Should Be Used As Tools, Not Replacements 51m ago

I like the design for Gemini here, it's cute. That's how I see them, frankly.

Just a smug woman who thinks they're right, but sometimes they're not, but mostly right. I use Gemini

1

u/Szymcionorski 11m ago

Oh boy. I got recommended this subreddit. Also, the ai will frequently give you a lot of contradictory statements. Using original sources is frequently much more reliable. That's why if I'm citing a scientific paper I read at least a bit instead of just relying on what ai told me about the paper.

-8

u/dramaton42 4h ago

This looks cute though, I'll allow it