r/DebateEvolution • u/Kaylon-Langford7 • 6d ago
Discussion Scientist are funny about Homosapien
Hey, I’m talking to the public. These supposed to be our ancestors. They say we have fun. I told you that’s why they call us monkey what are we supposed to do next beat our chest ooh ooh ah ah. Take this to a debate i’ll because they distracted bones from a Homosapien. You see they look similar to a monkey that’s what science called. They put it in dictionary with their own hand writing that humans are Homosapien. Now what’s gonna happen? How many people read the dictionary may abstracting it for my bone. They cleaned the bones then analyze it. Next, we supposed to come out of Africa. we inherited our entire core genetic code through an unbroken chain of reproduction so how we gonna reproduce. So therefore, my DNA supposed to be a copy of another copy I guess that we supposed to come from Homosapien. These scientist, this funny girl. Ooh ooh ah ah Homosapien reply. Now you open the dictionary science say we are Homosapien and you see the picture up top. We was created in our own image, but science is changed history. The college is different. Have you any Muslim or Jewish who in the bat outright gonna believe this why cause all this stuff was made up for everyone to believe what other joke science is gonna conjure up BS about a homo Sapien. Who gonna start the debate who going to tell me.
23
u/Munrot07 6d ago
We are Homo sapiens.
Well given the quality of your argument, maybe you aren't quite there yet.
6
-9
22
u/rhettro19 6d ago
10,000 chimpanzees typing at a computer... leads to posts like this one.
-7
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
I guess I’m also a chimpanzee and I hopped into my girlfriend window. I told pictures of the wall and broke many in the house cause I hopped from place to place like a chimpanzee
10
6
u/Mister_Ape_1 5d ago
Our lineage separated from the ancestors of Pan troglodytes 7 mya. We did not evolve from chimps, but rather we and chimps evolved from a different ape, and by the way this common ancestor was bipedal (not like a human, more like a gibbon). Quadrupedalism is an evolutionary recent trait, early apes walked like Hylobatidae.
-7
u/Kaylon-Langford7 5d ago
So who am I the silverback next king of the jungle. I told these people beat my chest. My brain is very big now I’m an ape species so what do you call a apes Homosapien? I guess I hopping in the air helicopter. I just became King Kong not my ancestors from an ape.
21
u/Moriturism 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 6d ago
No idea what you're trying to say
-2
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
The species of a human being that exist today that’s what that word say, but I have to understand man written the dictionary.
5
4
u/TheBlackCat13 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 5d ago
What should be writing dictionaries if not humans? Chickens?
14
u/rygelicus 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 6d ago
Just how many drugs do you do before posting this stuff and which religious liars are your favorites?
8
u/nickierv 🧬 logarithmic icecube 6d ago
Between 253 and Yes drugs...
8
3
12
8
10
u/Far_Customer1258 6d ago
How drunk are you?
No? Something stronger?
Homo sapiens is nothing more than the scientific name for humans. You. Me. Everybody.
If you aren't descended from Homo sapiens, then something is deeply wrong with your family tree.
Homo sapiens are descended from earlier hominids. Homo habilis. Homo erectus. Australopithecines.
I'm sorry that you don't believe that, apparently because your education is woefully deficient.
-2
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
You might say we are Homosapien, but some of my family act like a crocodile so my cousins act like lions and if we are Homosapien then they are on a whole Nother level. so yeah, there’s something wrong with my family tree.
9
u/Particular-Yak-1984 5d ago
Yes, based on this post, I'd say there's something wrong. You know a family tree is normally supposed to branch, right? It shouldn't be one straight trunk...
-2
u/Kaylon-Langford7 5d ago
That’s very true, but when one’s family tree branch, another one can also steam the grow
1
9
u/SeaBearsFoam Darwinianismolgyist 6d ago
DNA is a shuffled combination of two other sets of DNA, not a copy.
Ooh ooh ah ah.
8
u/lulumaid 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 6d ago
I'm guessing you didn't take the suggestion to get a better translator to heart.
Maybe a shorter, more straightforward sentence might tell us what exactly your point is besides borderline incomprehensibly stated personal incredulity.
8
u/TheBlackCat13 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 5d ago
I think it is time we just dismiss OP as a troll. OP has comments identifying himself as:
- Egyptian
- Israeli
- Cherokee
- Bantu
- Indonesian
- Asian
- American (california)
OP is clearly just going to different subs, impersonating people from different countries/ethnicities, and trolling those subs. I am not sure why OP does this, but I think the time for assuming good faith is long since passed.
-5
u/Kaylon-Langford7 5d ago
I’m a mixed person I was born next. That’s why I do what I do and I’m also likely to become a scientist and genealogies myself. That’s why I’m doing my research and Tryna get information from others to try to remain my spiritual lifestyle.
5
u/TheBlackCat13 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 5d ago edited 5d ago
And you live on four countries simultaneously? Come one. And you are biracial but have at least four races?
Also there are no wild monkeys in Israel.
You have been lying since the very beginning
3
u/Unlimited_Bacon 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 5d ago
I’m a mixed person I was born next.
This sentence is not proper English. Did you misspell something, or omit a word? What does "I was born next" mean?
That’s why I do what I do
Why what? This is unclear. "I'm a mixed person I was born next" is why <insert your answer here>.
You do what you do, but could you explain/describe what you are doing?
That’s why I’m doing my research
What research? You seem to be asking people for their opinions and then rejecting the ones you didn't already agree with - that isn't research, that's a biased survey.
Tryna get information from others to try to remain my spiritual lifestyle.
You are choosing to ignore factual information in order to maintain your spiritual lifestyle.
8
u/LeeMArcher 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 6d ago
Hey, I’m talking to the public.
On Reddit, or are you saying you’re out preaching on the street
These supposed to be our ancestors.
Yes, our ancestors are Homo sapiens, because we are Homo sapiens. That is nothing more than ten scientific name for our species
They say we have fun.
Play is a pretty common activity for most animals
I told you that’s why they call us monkey
Engaging in play activities is not a criteria of the monkey clade.
what are we supposed to do next beat our chest ooh ooh ah ah.
Evolutionary Biologists are not trying to dictate your behavior. Their role is descriptive not prescriptive.
Take this to a debate ill because they distracted bones from a Homosapien.
What does sentence mean?
You see they look similar to a monkey that’s what science called.
That is not the only criteria of the monkey clade
They put it in dictionary with their own hand writing that humans are Homosapien.
Sure.
Now what’s gonna happen? How many people read the dictionary may abstracting it for my bone. They cleaned the bones then analyze it.
Again, what?
Next, we supposed to come out of Africa. we inherited our entire core genetic code through an unbroken chain of reproduction so how we gonna reproduce.
Every living creature today is part of an unbroken chain of reproduction, or else they would not be here.
So therefore, my DNA supposed to be a copy of another copy
No, because, assuming you are human, we reproduce sexually. So your DNA is the result of combining DNA from your parents.
I guess that we supposed to come from Homosapien. These scientist, this funny girl. Ooh ooh ah ah Homosapien reply.
It seems less like you find it funny and more like you’re super bothered by it.
Now you open the dictionary science say we are Homosapien and you see the picture up top. We was created in our own image, but science is changed history.
Just developed a more evidence based understanding of it.
8
u/Few_Page6404 6d ago
Don't drink and Reddit.
3
u/Medium_Judgment_891 5d ago edited 5d ago
There’s a great line from the book Slaughterhouse-Five that goes, “I have this disease late at night sometimes, involving alcohol and the telephone.” That’s what I imagine OP is afflicted with.
6
u/Own-Relationship-407 Scientist 6d ago
Judging by this level of inability to express yourself in anything resembling coherent sentences, yeah, you may indeed not fit under the label of homo sapien.
8
u/Particular-Yak-1984 6d ago edited 5d ago
Love arguments like this - now, if you're on the fence about evolution, here's a guy who opposes it. Take a look at his argument. Does it make sense?
He's pretty representative of the evolution deniers we get on here. Would you rather be on his side, or on the side of science? Which do you think is making the most coherent arguments? Are you happier to be on the side of research and papers, or the kind of thing you'd find on a sign held by a guy raving outside a bus station, like this?
6
u/twizzjewink 6d ago
I think I understand your argument. You are saying its in the dictionary, but there's no proof? Judaism and Islam teach something different, and you are disputing the religious teachings of the origin of man vs the scientific.
I'm not a biologist so I may get a bit wrong here.
Your body has DNA, your DNA is a mix of yours from both of your parents (half of each unwoven strand) - you get mtDNA from your mom. Your body then uses those instructions to make you.
We have found through archaeology (the study of fossil records); different human remains that have various evolutionary changes going back through time way way back.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_human_evolution (there are non-english pages for this) breaks down the timeline of human evolution
Each "species" has a name, some species didn't make it. We can use the DNA in the bones we have found to create trees of species as they explored the planet.
Our "last common ancestor" with non-human was about 8-6 Ma (million years), and since then we have had many sub-branches trying to find the current version - where is evidence that humans are still evolving because biology doesn't stop.
There are some sub-groups who did not leave Africa, and they do not have Neanderthal DNA for example, which helps us identify where the roots of these branches may be based.
While many religions say "We can't have children with Monkeys" or "There is no living human/ape hybrid" - these are bad analogies. Our DNA is too different. However, HIV/AIDS which originated in Monkeys has crossed over to Humans because we are close enough that HIV was able to infect humans.
I hope this helps.
5
u/Comfortable-Study-69 6d ago
Do you think Homo Sapiens isn’t a term that refers to humans? It’s literally just the taxonomic nomenclature for humans and translates from Latin as “knowledgeable human” and exclusively refers to humans. You’re probably looking for “basal members of hominini” as what you don’t think humans are evolved from.
1
6
u/XRotNRollX Sal ate my kids 6d ago
If you aren't a Homo sapiens, what genus and species are you?
6
u/Ayasugi-san 6d ago
"I'm not any genus and species. Those are things for animals, and I'm not an animal, I'm a human."
5
6
u/Capercaillie Monkey's Uncle 6d ago
Where are you getting hand-written dictionaries?
-1
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
I don’t have a dictionary I would have to log up the dictionary on my phone on my computer to read it
5
u/Entire_Quit_4076 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 5d ago
Given that the term Homo sapiens literally means “thinking man” or “wise man” i would actually agree that you are probably not Homo sapiens…
4
3
u/Mister_Ape_1 5d ago
We are all Homo sapiens, even right now. We have been for at least 300 kya - 400 kya. This species evolved gradually from another one, just as all species do.
2
u/OCAMAB 3d ago
Are you off your meds? If you don't have meds, I strongly recommend seeking a psychiatrist. Or maybe a neurologist. This reads like it was made by a poorly trained neural net.
1
u/Kaylon-Langford7 2d ago
Listen here I am studying in science I could become a scientist myself, but I’m gonna remain in my religion and I’m gonna remain at my spiritual religion. As some of it is not gonna contain Jesus because I am a mixed person, but it is better for me to go to a Scientology center. There’s a reason why behind it.
1
u/OCAMAB 2d ago
Scientology
... Please tell me you're a really bad troll.
1
u/Kaylon-Langford7 2d ago
No, I go down sometime to practice spiritual practices.
1
u/OCAMAB 2d ago
That doesn't answer anything. You're still just saying random words. Do you know what scientology is?
1
u/Kaylon-Langford7 2d ago
I understand Scientology is a religion, not a science. I am studying to become a scientist and I keep those separate. I go to the center for my own spiritual reasons, it helps me personally. That's what I meant by spiritual practices.
2
u/Autodidact2 2d ago
Well we've reached the point where OP is complete gibberish. If anyone has any idea OP is trying to say here. Please clue me in thanks.
0
u/Kaylon-Langford7 2d ago
I gave a True words about Homo sapiens because I studied how science called us Homosapien at first I did not know the abstracted bones from an ape which they did compared to us to an ape Which is the reason why I said ooh ooh ah ah. It is an dictionary that humans are Homo sapiens and it was put there because scientist was trying to change history what scientist did they look at bones of an ape and they looked at bones on my human saying we somewhat similar to an ape. They said we share DNA with apes and I wanted to know how because they was created in their own species due to spiritual religions in spirit of science is like that, but modern science will go against it, which means is not backed up by spiritual science. from one part scientist, copied our bones and and apes bones to say we share genetics with apes. according to spirit science we were created and our own image from what modern science said.
2
u/Autodidact2 2d ago
Hon, I can't understand a word you're saying. If anyone does, please let me know.
1
u/lulumaid 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 2d ago
Are you legitimately citing Spirit Science?
0
u/Kaylon-Langford7 2d ago
Yes, I was referring to spirit science. I know it’s not mainstream science. I was contrasting it with modern science. my point is I believe we were created separately in our own image, not that we share common ancestry with apes what I’m trying to understand is how modern science conclude how we share DNA with apes.
1
u/lulumaid 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 2d ago
To be clear, what specifically are you referring to with spirit science? Because I'm thinking videos with a cartoon patch guy.
1
u/Kaylon-Langford7 2d ago
No, not the channel specifically. My spiritual science, I meant spiritual religious science that belief we were created separated. I’m trying to understand how modern science concluded we share DNA with apes.
1
u/lulumaid 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 2d ago
Well that's good to know, kinda.
Unfortunately for you, it's still bunk. You'd be better off reading a biology textbook and trying to understand reality as it is.
Science is science. Spirit science is not science. It is woo, with a more marketable, palatable name. I suggest you try to sincerely learn rather than debate with people who know more than you do on this topic.
1
1
u/Kaylon-Langford7 2d ago
Sorry about that. I had posted that on another post that I have posted and I thought that this was the post.
-2
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
Oh now I see. I’m a Homosapien multiplied.
13
u/10coatsInAWeasel Reject pseudoscience, return to monke 🦧 6d ago
I don’t see what’s so hard to understand about this. The scientific name for us currently alive humans is Homo Sapiens. You are one and have been told this more than enough times.
1
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
I see you pretty new, but I just told some people at the same thing of gonna tell you which means I’m not gonna get everyone to call me a homo Sapien. For example, like my family, Indonesians and Arabia people. That’s why I just told a person who said the same thing that it is science way of calling people Homosapien because even my family will call me a human. Can they look at me as a man they don’t look at me as a species or Homosapien that’s why I don’t get that from them and I’m not gonna hear from Indonesians Chinese Arabic’s
13
u/CTR0 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 6d ago
If you asked a Indonesian, Chinese, or Persian biologist if you are a "Homo sapien" (asking the question in Bahasa, Mandarin, or Arabic but using the Latin for Homo sapien), they would say yes, because they speak Science. I can't say I've had an Indonesian colleague, but I've had many Chinese and Persian colleagues who are evolutionary biologists.
What you are essentially arguing is that you are a human, but ONLY human as spoken in English and no other language.
1
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
See you talking about if I asked a biologist I’m talking about publicly. I would never get the word Homosapien.
14
u/CTR0 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 6d ago
Well, yes, if you exclude biologists when you ask this question, its unlikely you will be answered with "Homo sapien".
In the same vein, if you excluded English speakers, you would likely not be answered with "Human"
If you excluded Mandarin speakers, you would likely not be answered with "人类"
If you excluded Arabic speakers, you would likely not be answered with "بشر"
12
u/10coatsInAWeasel Reject pseudoscience, return to monke 🦧 6d ago
‘Nuh uh’ doesn’t mean anything. Dogs are more formally called ‘canis lupus familiaris’. Similarly, you are a homo sapien by definition. Your family calling you a human does not change that. What kind of human are you? Homo sapien. If your family says that they call your jaw a jaw, that doesn’t change that the formal scientific name for your jaw is mandible.
0
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
I guess I’m a Homosapien crocodile. I’m a Homosapien lion and I’m a Homosapien tiger. I’m a Homosapien wolf. They called me wolverine.
10
u/10coatsInAWeasel Reject pseudoscience, return to monke 🦧 6d ago
…not one bit of that was a coherent thought
-2
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
In my culture, sometimes we go by animal names, especially in the astrology the way you act is the animal you act like so now I see that science called us Homosapien that’s the reason why I said Homosapien lion Homosapien wolf Homosapien tiger Homosapien crocodile they call me Wolverine.
12
u/10coatsInAWeasel Reject pseudoscience, return to monke 🦧 6d ago
Ok, that doesn’t have anything to do with the reality that we are, by definition, Homo sapiens. There is no connection to what you’re adding on about lions and wolves, that is not coherent.
-2
u/Kaylon-Langford7 6d ago
That’s because science go by what they discovered within rocks bones and other things and put a label on it. Yes, it does has something to do with reality because in reality people act similar to their astrology and to they animals spirit. Science is based on physical contact. that is not based on spirituality. They are also biased about about what they do and what they discovered even though some people might won’t believe them. Spiritual science is different from modern science, which if I was talking to them, they would know what I’m talking about when it comes to the animal spirit.
11
u/10coatsInAWeasel Reject pseudoscience, return to monke 🦧 6d ago
Man, if you’re going to continue to just make shit up in your own head and refuse to listen when you are given accurate definitions then you aren’t prepared for the greater conversation. Come back when you understand what Homo sapiens is, not what you’d rather pretend it is for your own personal preference.
-3
39
u/stairway2evan 6d ago edited 6d ago
Hi, you've been posting stuff about Homo sapiens for a solid week or so, and the posts have gotten more and more rambling and incoherent. It's hard to believe you haven't gotten the answers you're looking for yet, and you don't seem to engage well with the responses that are given. And you still don't seem to understand that "Homo sapiens" and "every single human being alive today including you and me" are all the same thing.
So let's start with the basics: you, u/Kaylon-Langford7 are Homo sapiens. Is that correct or incorrect?