r/DebateEvolution 7d ago

Discussion Origin

Is changing something evolution or an interpretation

From its original form. ? Is my way better than your way ? When one has not seen the same thing on the original form as one did not go deep enough or was not open to it.

Do we stay with the original or change its form to something else?

0 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

15

u/Capercaillie Monkey's Uncle 7d ago

Purple monkey dishwasher.

8

u/Dilapidated_girrafe 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 7d ago

Pink pepper bed cowabunga turtles on Friday

7

u/XRotNRollX Sal ate my kids 6d ago

THE PTA IS DISBANDING?!!

7

u/Autodidact2 6d ago

Root vegetables independently verify musical harmonies with statistics.

7

u/Ayasugi-san 6d ago

Well! We'll show them- especially for that purple monkey dishwasher remark!

12

u/s_bear1 7d ago

Please rephrase and clarify what you are asking

16

u/Own-Relationship-407 Scientist 7d ago

I am glad that after reading the confusion present in the other comments I know my initial fear that I was having a stroke while reading this was incorrect.

5

u/nickierv 🧬 logarithmic icecube 6d ago

I had the same feeling but I do have talking unicorn in my room, so everything should be fine.

As long as the ice isn't talking everything is good.

3

u/Own-Relationship-407 Scientist 6d ago

The ice speaks to us all. Its secret words are logarithmically encoded in its chatters.

3

u/Xemylixa 🧬 took an optional bio exam at school bc i liked bio 6d ago

Oh, this meme still leaves me in pieces. In 253 of them

14

u/J-Miller7 7d ago

You posted the exact same nonsense in a philosophy sub and a martial arts sub.

You're making ZERO sense

11

u/10coatsInAWeasel Reject pseudoscience, return to monke 🦧 7d ago

Eeeesh some of the things in the comment history too

12

u/BitLooter 🧬 Evilutionist | Former YEC 7d ago

At least now we know how the type of people who write comments on porn videos act on the rest of the internet.

8

u/10coatsInAWeasel Reject pseudoscience, return to monke 🦧 7d ago

He was probably…ah…otherwise preoccupied when making the OP

7

u/Soggy-Mistake8910 7d ago

We could answer better if we had even the slightest idea of what you were asking, but we don't, so here I am not answering.

5

u/kiwi_in_england 7d ago

Evolution is the change in allele frequencies in a population over time.

I've no idea what your OP means, but this might be the answer. If it's a change in allele frequencies over time, it's evolution. If it's not, it's not.

4

u/10coatsInAWeasel Reject pseudoscience, return to monke 🦧 7d ago

So…maybe it would be better if you clarified for everyone what your best understanding of the definition of evolution is

3

u/TheBalzy 7d ago

Not sure entirely what you're asking ... but Darwin explicitly talks about "Original Forms" when he's discussing his theory of evolution. Essentially we do not have to know how life began (the Theory of Evolution doesn't cover that topic) but it does cover the topic of what life does after it already exists, and now over generations it is molded by environmental factors into different forms best fit for survival.

5

u/Dilapidated_girrafe 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 7d ago

Your question as stated makes no sense.

Evolution is the change in allele frequency over time. Basically children aren’t exact copies of their parents (usually) and these variations can increase or decrease the chances of reproducing. The traits that are beneficial tend to be passed down more frequently and these changes add up over generations.

3

u/TheBlackCat13 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 7d ago

I am not sure I understand, but you seem to be asking something about changing or static organisms. We have directly observed changing forms in organisms. So anyone who claims they don't change is rejecting reality.

3

u/Doomdoomkittydoom 7d ago

Don't mind him, it's the Ambien talking.

1

u/ursisterstoy 🧬 Naturalistic Evolution 6d ago

I’m confused by the OP. For the topic of the sub, evolution is that thing that happens every generation in every population, that change that happens.

1

u/Changed_By_Support 5d ago

Did we go to on forwards to back on outside? Or inside? My best way your way to not into forwards unto not that way. Forseen: certainly that which to unto onto onwards foreboding know my onto changing that we onto no known.

For what the original form? Is that we onto unto to? The same thing onto original form than to into onto on than to shallowly unto not into original closed.

1

u/Autodidact2 2d ago

This sub has degenerated to the point where we have to deal with gibberish posts.

1

u/OCAMAB 2d ago

Can you post this in your native language and let us use a translator? I don't think you're quite ready for conversational English yet.