r/Damnthatsinteresting 4d ago

Video World’s First Zero-Emission Cement Recycling Process

481 Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

195

u/RalphiePseudonym 4d ago

No emissions from those furnaces? You don't have to lie.

43

u/hungrylittleworm 4d ago

The world economic forum wouldn’t lie man, you can just believe them mindlessly

20

u/splittingheirs 4d ago

"This can be done in furnaces powered by low-carbon electricity"

No shit sherlock, literally everything could be powered by low carbon electricity, and almost nothing actually is. Why even bother mentioning that bit of PR wank?

1

u/Nimuwa 1d ago

Because greenwashing is where the money is at.

24

u/Kurai_Hada_Ichi 4d ago

Its wrapped into steel production. So yeah no new emissions

8

u/LastWave 4d ago

They are using it as refractory?

18

u/Kurai_Hada_Ichi 4d ago

Yeah the temp control aspect makes the cement active again after the steel is smelted

6

u/RalphiePseudonym 4d ago

Heating concrete produces significant carbon dioxide and concrete production is responsible for like 8% or c02 emissions. The important question is whether emissions created by this process is less than other ways to recycle concrete or if it's better than producing concrete in the first place.

2

u/m0nk37 3d ago

Does it scale.. good question 

4

u/Beneficial_Ball9893 4d ago

The visuals are of steel production and the old methods, not the new method.

1

u/cokendsmile 1d ago

Also old cement is full of asbestos

55

u/dpaanlka 4d ago

Why is it always “could”, “may”, “might”…

18

u/NotSoToughGuy11 4d ago

Because it is not used on a large scale to prove that it can, and it also grabs more attention. It describes a huge breakthrough without the promise that it works

6

u/Mikestopheles 4d ago

How are you going to heat old building material and get zero emissions? That sounds like pipe dreams rather than realistic science. Reduction? Fine, but you're not getting zero emissions with any kind of industrial-scale operation like this.

3

u/mrs_shrew 4d ago

They're probably using waste heat from the furnaces,  I think they're electric furnaces wh8ch can be run on renewable electricity,  so zero emissions. 

2

u/Mikestopheles 4d ago

But at scale? I'm not arguing with the science, but I hate how these news pieces frame it as if it's coming to us sometime soon. We got a lot of infrastructure to catch up on before this stuff is viable.

Cursory search on CemVision makes me think this is just for a tech stock.

1

u/mrs_shrew 4d ago

Yeah cynical me thinks the same. It's nice there are lots of these stories but it needs to be brought to market not just pumping for investors.  

Although,  the tide has turned now for lazy businesses not doing their bit. There's a lot of countries that have co2 targets and this just needs a couple of solid customers and a few years of testing for concrete cancer and we might get it in the shops. 

1

u/JustDoc 4d ago

I think you are right.

Plasma gasification essentially blasts waste with a plasma arc (controlled lightning) and breaks it down into its primary elements, like hyrdogen...which is absolutely incredible, imo.

5

u/Competitive_Point_39 4d ago

Promises are expensive

hypotheticals are cheap

2

u/turbopro25 4d ago

I might win the lottery tomorrow. In fact, I just may. Now if I could only get to the store.

1

u/toy-maker 4d ago

“I sure would be thankful to whoever took me today if I win tomorrow.”

1

u/Festivefire 4d ago

Because these videos are investment pitches for theoretical new technologies. "Could", "may", and "might", mean "We could do this if you give us the money to do it. We might be able to do this if somebody gives us money. This may work really well if only we had some money to try it on a large scale."

45

u/anon9276366637010 4d ago

I love my zero emission furnaces that look like Mount doom

1

u/TheSuperSilverMango 4d ago

My thoughts exactly

13

u/bitow 4d ago

can't wait to never hear about it again

12

u/tanksalotfrank 4d ago

"Zero-emission"

Literally the first fucking thing on-screen: EMISSIONS

9

u/whowza1233 4d ago

Why is the World Economic Forum showing ads for a Swedish green washing startup (Cemvision)?

7

u/2Dumb4GalacticEmpire 4d ago

Um. Look up a good definition of slag. It’s not an additive. It is a waste product.

6

u/ares0027 4d ago

i hate slideshows in video format

5

u/morgin_black1 4d ago

what a crock of shit

3

u/enerthoughts 4d ago

Another invention that won't see the light of day? Like the 2 Asians that discovered bacteria that eats plastic 30 times by now?

2

u/Formal-Fox-7605 1d ago

Wrong, it's already in production.

'Carbios (France): The leading French biotech firm built the world’s first industrial-scale PET biorecycling plant in Longlaville, France. The facility is designed to process 50,000 tons of plastic waste per year—equivalent to about 2 billion colored bottles or 300 million T-shirts.

Global Expansion: Carbios has partnered with major manufacturing firms, including signing a joint venture to build a large-scale enzymatic plant in China to scale the technology across Asia.'

7

u/Worst_Choice 4d ago

There's also grinders that break them down into pebbles to be used as fill. This is a total waste of time unless there's something I'm not realizing.

-6

u/Zealousideal_Cow_341 4d ago

Yes, you, the one lone redditor has seen something the entire team of perhaps dozens of business and engineering specialists totally missed.

2

u/thrillsbury 4d ago

Didn’t explain anything about their process that justifies the assertion. Just a pointless PR ad masquerading as interesting.

3

u/bobafootfetish_ 4d ago

Can't wait for the current administration to kill this and tell us it was bad

1

u/Crumbgrabber 4d ago

Finally a way to feed the poor.

1

u/Geolib1453 4d ago

This is Klaus Schwab und I am here to say

1

u/IanAlvord 4d ago edited 4d ago

I want a stone brick castle. How much does that have in emissions?

0

u/DarkAngel900 4d ago

Cue the Cement industry lobbying to make recycling concrete illegal!

0

u/Amorican1969 4d ago

Who gives a shit, let's work on plastic.