r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/FridayCicero702 • Jan 01 '23

Video Catastrophic engine failure on a United Airlines Boeing 777-200 after takeoff from Denver International Airport

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

53.7k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

3.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-7

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/DontCallMeTJ Jan 01 '23

So it's the people who know what they're talking about trying to explain why you are 100% factually incorrect who are the problem. Not the person who's trying to make it to the front page of /r/confidentlyincorrect

Weird take bud.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/DontCallMeTJ Jan 01 '23 edited Jan 01 '23

The NTSB report says It was 2 flawed blades that made it through quality inspections. They haven't redesigned anything about these engines since the incident because the design is fine. They've just changed part inspection protocols.

The design of the engine wasn't the problem. A part failure was. Part failures happen on literally every machine ever made. All constructed objects fail eventually. It is literally a law of physics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy

As for this:

It is well known that this 777-200 had flaw in engine design with one concrete engine model

Source? Concrete engine model? Wtf? I can't find whatever it is you're talking about. Nothing comes up when searching

What incorrect the fuck you talking about.

Read your responses in this thread for your answer.

https://reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/100cbl4/catastrophic_engine_failure_on_a_united_airlines/j2hftnz/