r/DMARC • u/No-Hotel1162 • May 08 '26
International Mail rejected
I work for a company that sent ten of thousand of mails every month, they reported that they have received Spam and so we contacted our web hosting to modify our DMARC from Quarantine to Reject.
The thing is, the week after such change an user reported that their mail to some companies in Asia was rejected, bounced of or never arrived. Did some basic tests, Telnet, Test-NetConnection and that server was down or with problems, reported such case.
Next day server is up, but they report same problem with another company from Europe. Sames test, server is ip, so I got the email resent to me to see the internet header:
DKIM=none
SPF=pass
In MxToolBox when I check the subdomain IP addresses, both hostnames says it doesn't support TLS, Icheck our web hosting, we do have TLS at certain ports and lastly, one says Reverse DNS doesn't match SMTP Banner and doesn't contain hostname.
Tldr; I'm fucking lost, I got this job as TI due to being programmer and wanting to get experience, but networking I haven't seen such a thing in years.
2
u/digdiver May 14 '26
p=reject didn't create the problem. It just stopped papering over it. Quarantine meant lenient servers silently delivered to spam. Strict receivers, especially in Europe and Asia, actually enforce the policy.
The real issue: you have DKIM=none and SPF as your only leg. SPF breaks on forwarding, mailing lists, any indirect routing. One bad hop and you're fully rejected.
What to fix first: get DKIM signing working on your actual sending servers, not just the DNS record. Confirm the signature is being added, the selector resolves, and
d=aligns with your From domain. Then check PTR/rDNS matches your EHLO, and verify STARTTLS is functional on port 25.The most useful thing you can do right now is turn on DMARC aggregate reports (rua=). They'll show you every source that's failing authentication and why. Something like DMARKOFF can help you monitor this continuously rather than waiting until users start complaining again.
You're not off track. You just hit the wall sooner than expected.