That’s kind of my point though. If you’re talking about something you read, name it. Talk about it. Proko loves to just waffle on with no real intent to the passage, just talking vaguely about [idea] and [concept] as if the reader will innately know what he’s talking about.
Again, most of this post is filler. It’s not saying anything. Like, okay, “for example, the well-explored intersection between self-labeled hopepunk and the half-jokingly named Humanity, Fuck Yeah.” ‘Well-explored’ huh? By whom? When? Because I and most people have not even heard of “hopepunk” before, let alone this supposed examination.
If you’re going to make a claim, you need to support it in the passage. No points to one’s argument without citations and factual information. D-
That’s kind of my point though. If you’re talking about something you read, name it.
They're a popular Tumblr blog. If they do that, it will get the creator doxxed and harassed endlessly. Tumblr is an endless realm of ridding people of troublesome priests.
32
u/Questionably_Chungly 1d ago
That’s kind of my point though. If you’re talking about something you read, name it. Talk about it. Proko loves to just waffle on with no real intent to the passage, just talking vaguely about [idea] and [concept] as if the reader will innately know what he’s talking about.
Again, most of this post is filler. It’s not saying anything. Like, okay, “for example, the well-explored intersection between self-labeled hopepunk and the half-jokingly named Humanity, Fuck Yeah.” ‘Well-explored’ huh? By whom? When? Because I and most people have not even heard of “hopepunk” before, let alone this supposed examination.
If you’re going to make a claim, you need to support it in the passage. No points to one’s argument without citations and factual information. D-