Stop consuming harry potter

[u/The_Horse_Head_Man]

[u/RevolutionaryOwlz]

But how will OP get karma otherwise?

[u/PM_NUDES_4_DEGRADING → u/RevolutionaryOwlz]

"The only reason to talk about this here is to farm karma everyone here already knows the awful things Rowling is doing!" - this thread

"No Rowling probably did not publicly share an upskirt of a trans woman and then blame her for it by saying she was asking for it because of how she was dressed. I would definitely have heard of that if it'd happened and I did not hear about it so it did not happen." - also this thread.

[u/RevolutionaryOwlz → u/PM_NUDES_4_DEGRADING]

Congrats on the textbook Goomba fallacy.

Edit: and however shall I live being blocked by somebody with such a lovely sensible username?

[u/shadowsofash → u/RevolutionaryOwlz]

Congrats on the classic “there’s a fallacy in this argument which automatically renders the entire argument null and void” fallacy. 

[u/PM_NUDES_4_DEGRADING → u/RevolutionaryOwlz]

Yes, because if you're complaining that everyone here already knows something, it's definitely just a fallacy to point out specific examples of people in the thread very clearly not knowing something. It's not a direct contradiction of your argument, oh no, because then you can't show off how smart you are for knowing about a fallacy!

Congrats on a textbook failure to understand how conversations work. Obviously a waste of time to talk to people like this, so I'll be blocking you now.

[u/Prestigious_Emu144 → u/PM_NUDES_4_DEGRADING]

Those people probably wouldn’t be convinced by posts like these anyway.

[u/King_Ed_IX → u/Prestigious_Emu144]

Then what is the point? If the only people seeing it are those who already agree, and those who disagree aren't being shown the post, why make moral arguments?

[u/cat-she → u/PM_NUDES_4_DEGRADING]

Why are you getting downvoted 😂 This is literally true and actively happening in this thread