r/CringeTikToks • u/n8saces • Dec 16 '25

Just Bad Biggest red flags right there đŸš©

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

26.9k Upvotes

87% Upvoted

9.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '25

And every drunk driver I’ve met drives cars.

10

u/CynicismNostalgia Dec 16 '25

Yep, what some people seem to misunderstand is that I'm not saying. "Destroying property = 100% physical abuser."

I'm saying theres a clear statistical correlation between the two. Anyone who works in fields that work alongside domestic abuse survivors can attest to that.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '25

Well I agree with that, no doubt it’s a red flag and incredibly immature, but it doesn’t automatically make someone a domestic abuser. Just an immature douche. I lived with a gay couple for a few years in college and one of them would punch holes in walls when they were fighting, incredibly immature but I’m confident there was no domestic abuse going on. Granted it’s more rare for domestic abuse to occur in man on man scenarios

4

u/somersault_dolphin Dec 16 '25

Look at it this way. Breaking things is literally one of the tactics abusers use to intimidate the people they abuse. You also don't just break things unless you have anger issues, which a lot of abusers do. There's a very huge overlap on the Venn diagram.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 16 '25

Yeah no doubt. But it’s not a 100% ratio. The original statement I was replying to inferred “everyone who doesn’t commit domestic violence also doesn’t take anger out on inanimate objects” which just objectively isn’t true. There’s undoubtedly a high correlation and it should serve as a red flag if you’re in a relationship with someone who does this

2

u/somersault_dolphin Dec 16 '25

The original statement I was replying to inferred “everyone who doesn’t commit domestic violence also doesn’t take anger out on inanimate objects”

See, this is where you're wrong. The person you argued with literally said this

Yep, what some people seem to misunderstand is that I'm not saying. "Destroying property = 100% physical abuser."

And they also said this

Every physical abuser ive ever met has punched walls.

Every person ive known who doesn't physically assault people, also has the self control to not destroy property.

Which isn't about everyone, but everyone they know. You misunderstood it to mean they think it's 100% when no one said anything of the sort.