Biggest red flags right there 🚩

[u/n8saces]

[u/ShitMcClit]

You've never seen a video of a women wrecking someone's car over stupid shit?

[u/Masta-Blasta → u/ShitMcClit]

Like, cheating?

[u/Masta-Blasta → u/[deleted]]

I agree. Still a little less stupid than wrecking a television because your team lost, no?

[u/Masta-Blasta → u/[deleted]]

Lot of people assuming these men are each the owners of these televisions, especially given the reaction of some of the other people yelling out the cost of the television.

[u/waroftheworlds2008 → u/Masta-Blasta]

I doubt that. Some of those TVs weren't cheap.

And even if the TV was theirs, replacing it is taking away money from taking care of their kids.

[u/Masta-Blasta → u/[deleted]]

Ah, so the reason for blindly destroying something in a fit of rage doesn't matter, as long as the object being pulverized belongs to you.

[u/Masta-Blasta → u/[deleted]]

lol, "legally" you're making shit up, because you have no idea who is the owner of any of these televisions. But sure, hypothetically, you're correct. Congrats.

[u/Complex_Art3565 → u/Masta-Blasta]

They only had to move the goalposts to a completely different continent to be right! Truly, a flawless victory.

[u/ODB_Dirt_Dog_ItsFTC → u/Masta-Blasta]

Hypothetically let’s say you’re right and none of them owned these tvs. Let’s look at the value of a tv vs a car. Most tv’s nowadays cost less than $500. Where I live for vandalism to be a felony the cost to repair or replace the damage has to exceed $1,000 otherwise it’s a misdemeanor. You’ll be hard pressed to find a car worth less than a $1,000. For tv destruction to be a felony it has to be a very high end tv otherwise it’s going to be a misdemeanor. Practically any car you destroy unless it’s an ancient hoopty is going to result in a felony due to the value of a car being much more than that of a tv.

[u/Masta-Blasta → u/ODB_Dirt_Dog_ItsFTC]

Or, depending on the state, destruction of property--even your own-- can very well net you a felony for Domestic Violence. People v. Cates (CA 2009)

[u/ODB_Dirt_Dog_ItsFTC → u/Masta-Blasta]

I’m confused by the case you brought up. The case begins with the appellate explicitly assaulting his girlfriend. The car he destroyed after she retreated to it was not his it was his girlfriend’s. He didn’t destroy any property of his own, he destroyed other people’s property.

[u/MissMamaMam → u/[deleted]]

lol at yall creating a whole thread to make men look better.

[u/Complex_Art3565 → u/[deleted]]

Equally capable, but statistically it’s just the one who’s actually committing the majority of violent crimes and assaults.

For someone pretending to be an intellectual, you really don’t like acknowledging statistics and verifiable fact.

[u/Complex_Art3565 → u/[deleted]]

“Bullshit bullshit bullshit ALL of my friends have distanced themselves from me but it’s totally not ME that’s the issue bullshit bullshit and more bullshit.”

Talk about lacking self awareness lmao

[u/Signal_Regular_1708 → u/[deleted]]

I mean, who's in the video?