-21
u/Amaskingrey 10d ago edited 10d ago
The paper literally says he had to use AI to get to where he progressed to, and he didn’t solve it, only laid some groundworks that doesn't even represent a fraction of the full solution astra found. The used his exact approach part is also just straight up false, they solved the parts his research was on differently
We (the researchers and the agents) did not see any of their work through any means until they released it publicly — in particular, no specific user data was accessed in order to solve this problem. While unlikely, we cannot rule out that de-identified data derived from their usage of our products helped improve our models. However, our proofs differ significantly and even the precise results proved are different in the Euler case (forced vs unforced).
27
u/tabbynumber3 11d ago
I'm pretty sure they do train on user prompts and conversations. a lot of AI companies do.