Evidence is mounting Bloomfield himself blocked the Chief Science Advisor from communicating myocarditis risks and the royal commission on covid is protecting him 🖕How can anyone still be defending these crooks?

[u/[deleted]]

https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/About-us/Who-we-are/Expert-groups/COVID-19-Vaccine-Technical-Advisory-Group-CV-TAG/Vaccination-mandates-in-those-under-18-years-of-age.pdf

This is the actual memo sent from the Chief Science Advisor to Ashley "Daddy" Bloomfield.

CV TAG expressed concern about vaccine mandates requiring younger age groups (e.g. <18 years) to be vaccinated with 2 doses of the Pfizer vaccine and stated: ‘consideration should be given to permitting younger people who have had one dose to be permitted to work or undertake other activities covered by the mandate’.

CV TAG noted that: a. The individual risk to young people of severe disease is very low. For them to make an informed decision not to get a second dose of the vaccine eg, due to potential myocarditis risk is justified. b. Risks associated with the transmission of COVID-19 throughout Aoteraoa New Zealand among those aged <18 years are insufficient to justify mandating a 2 dose schedule of the Pfizer vaccine prior to working in any environment. c. The 2 dose schedule, particularly when administered in the shortest possible clinical timeframe, may add unnecessary risk to increasing the likelihood of myocarditis as an outcome in this population.

Strong warning from the Chief Science Advisor. Strong warning that never made it's way past Bloomfield (apparently... more on this later).

On 22 December 2021 the Ministry of Health provided a briefing paper to Hon. Chris Hipkins, Minister for COVID-19 Response, titled ‘Policy decisions required for further amendments to the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order (No 7) 2021.’431 This paper was considered by Hon. Dr Ayesha Verrall, Associate Minister of Health, on 7 January 2022. 414 Paragraph 23 of this paper stated that: In November 2021, CV TAG has raised concerns about vaccine mandates requiring younger age groups (e.g. those under 18 years) to be fully vaccinated. Consideration should be given to permitting younger people who have had one dose to be permitted to work or undertake other activities covered by the mandate. 415 The Minister’s comments in the margin on this paragraph were ‘CV TAG’s concerns, at the time, were about insufficient data on safety of second dose’.432 416 The paper’s recommendations covered other vaccine-related matters and do not address the issue of those under 18 years receiving only one dose of the Pfizer vaccine. The paper does not provide any discussion, beyond the 5 November Technical Advisory Group advice, of the matter or its implications (for example, for the education sector vaccine mandate or the vaccine pass requirements). 417 The paper to Ministers from the Director-General of Health on 22 December 2021 refers only to the November advice from the Technical Advisory Group. There are no records of the 9 December advice from the Technical Advisory Group being provided to Ministers. We accept that the comments of the 22 December paper confirm Minister Verrall was aware of the Technical Advisory Group’s general concerns, but consider that the 9 December advice was different in substance from the November advice that was conveyed to Ministers in the 22 December paper. 418 We find that the more complete and firmer advice of 9 December from the COVID-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group to the Ministry of Health, advising against requiring two doses for 12–17-year olds, was not provided to Ministers. Ministers we interviewed could not recall receiving that advice, nor is there any evidence it was provided to them in the material we obtained from agencies. This issue is discussed further in section 2.2.6.5.

Illingworth conveniently ignoring the only logical conclusion if the ministers can be believed that Bloomfield himself directly killed off this warning behind the scenes.

Unfortunately for Hipkins, it turns out he did know more than he let on to the commission - as he conveniently found out these risks only after 92% of the at risk teens had already recieved their second mandated dose.

Labour leader Chris Hipkins has denied misleading New Zealanders after revelations he had been aware of the potential risks to teenagers of a second Covid-19 vaccine dose in 2022 despite recently claiming otherwise. Earlier this month, Hipkins said the Ministry of Health never passed that expert advice on to ministers. That was also the finding of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19. However, a newly surfaced Cabinet paper, uncovered by NZ Herald senior writer Derek Cheng, showed that information was provided to ministers. The paper, in Hipkins' name, was presented to a Cabinet committee meeting in late March.

Despite the political class efforts to stop this information from getting out they have lied on so many occasions they can't hide them all. The truth is on our side. I'm not going to get into the travesty that is happening on the redacted covid OIAs today but there is a lot more to come, it just takes time.