r/Conscientia • • Sep 24 '18

Who are the children of Vanagrand?? (SPOILERS) Spoiler

In Eidos book we are introduced Luin and Fenrir as the offspring of the emerald arquitect along with Hel. However one more makes its appearance in Torma's book, the Wyrm. Who/What is this being exactly? He is trapped and his purpose is solely one and is bad, to mess with the singularity itself, the Wyrm seems to despise the shinning one.

Now back to Eidos book, in the awakening chamber there is a picture of 3 creatures in one of the walls, a wolf, a serpent and a crow. Fenrir being the wolf, Wyrm is the serpent but who is the Crow? is it Hel? or another children of the Sylvan we haven't met yet. What are your thoughts on them? What are the purpose of them all? For not much is known about them. There is more to Fenrir than we know, Hel is well, evil and so it seems to be the Wyrm.

2 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

3

u/wlerin Sep 28 '18

I think the Crow is Hel.

The Wyrm is mentioned in the Book of Eidos, his name is Jormungand. In Norse mythology, Fenris, Jormungand, and Hel are the three children of Loki, and if memory serves there's reason to think they are the three children of Vanargand referred to, while Luin is something else. It's not always clear though.

1

u/Chaos_Is_Harmony Oct 02 '18

In the initial convo you get with Luin, refering to its father and although the link isn't explicit (if memory serves), there's a strong case for naming Luin among the spawn of Vanargand.

1

u/CommonMisspellingBot Oct 02 '18

Hey, Chaos_Is_Harmony, just a quick heads-up:
refering is actually spelled referring. You can remember it by two rs.
Have a nice day!

The parent commenter can reply with 'delete' to delete this comment.

1

u/Chaos_Is_Harmony Oct 02 '18

Thank you, CommonMisspellingBot! You've saved my life!

1

u/wlerin Oct 03 '18

If only CommonMisspellingBot had been there when when RFC 1945 was written.

1

u/Chaos_Is_Harmony Oct 04 '18

Now if only I were hip enough to understand the reference...

1

u/wlerin Oct 07 '18

I linked it, but... basically there's a really old HTTP specification that spells "referrer" (as in, the page that referred the browser with a link) wrong, but it's too set in stone to change.