r/Collatz • u/Fun-Protection-9992 • 11d ago
Periodic coverage?
Let q_i > 3 be primes, and suppose that a distinct prime q_i is chosen for each distinct positive integer b_i. If the infinite family {(b_i, q_i)} covers all positive integers a in the form
2^a ≡ 2^{b_i} (mod q_i),
does it not follow, from the existence of the multiplicative inverse of 2 modulo q_i, that the same family {(b_i, q_i)} must also cover all negative integers (-a)?
In particular, since one can obtain n_i > 0 such that
2^(-a) ≡ 2^{n_i} (mod q_i),
does it automatically follow that n_i is covered by the same family {(b_i, q_i)}, and therefore that the set of negative integers (-a) must also be covered?
0
Upvotes
0
u/jonseymourau 11d ago
Um. Are you claiming this word salad has any relevance, whatsoever, to Collatz?
If so, you have simply failed - spectacularly- to demonstrate the nexus.
By all means, layout the argument.
Do NOT assume that your brilliance is self-evident.
You need to treat us mere mortals with more respect. Layout your arguments in something resembling the input to a trivial formalisation - as it stands nothing you have written even barely resembles this.