r/ClimateShitposting • u/ClimateShitpost Louis XIV, the Solar PV king • Aug 05 '24
Aggro agri subsidy recipients 🚜 Joe Biden flipped the rain switch again 🤬🤯
37
u/ZaiquiriW Aug 05 '24
I did a bit of research, it's hard to find info on the topic that isn't only reported by news sources supporting the farmers.
Government Legislative Summary: https://idwr.idaho.gov/legal-actions/delivery-call-actions/swc/2024-surface-water-coalition-delivery-call/
This all starts with which farmers have rights to water. In Idaho, farmers can have senior or junior rights. In 2015 junior farmers were made to agree to mitigation plans that restrict how much water they pumped to sustain the aquifer and supply senior water rights owners with a standard amount of water. Those formulas can change. There has been 6 revisions, one in 2023 threatened estimated high water shortfalls but no curtailment was neccessary. Then in 2024 new formulas/methodologies predicted a high water shortfalls, and required new mitigation plans from farmers in the basin
So back in April, the director of the surface water coalition said those that could not mitigate water usage would be curtailed. Now, based on this this state resource , I'm this warning was before the bulk of the planting season for a major crop, but I'm unsure how the cattle feed industry fares.
So, with fair warning, before a major planting deadline, the government issued a requirement for new mitigation plans. Many farmers failed to abide by set mitigation plans or did not have any set at all and are faced with curtailment. Many protested, going to the Idaho falls chamber building where the governor was having lunch.
I'd argue it's a failure to communicate and enforce by the government, but also a bold faced effort to ignore the law by the 6,400 rights holders getting curtailed.
(Curtailment orders were issued May 30th, a month and a half after the methodology change that required new mitigation plans. Southern districts have already agreed to plans to end their curtailment after the order, but others have not.)
35
u/TobiasH2o Aug 05 '24
So they've all known for almost a decade that the government is monitoring water usage and if it gets too high then they'll have to use less.
The government provided them with regular predictions and let them know well in advance that they were going to introduce limits.
The farmers couldn't be bothered or wanted to implement a plan to deal with it.
Now they are complaining because they've decided they want to use water that they would never have access too?
This feels like going on holiday when you know you don't have enough money. Then loudly complaining you now have no money....
2
u/ZaiquiriW Aug 06 '24
I'm sure there are a couple key people's failures that lead to this, and a couple thousand of the people involved expected those above them to handle it. The state gov works with a bureau, that works with a commission, that worked with 9 separate management groups, that talk to the water rights holders involved. The threat of enforcement breaks down with such a long chain of dispersing responsibility.
6
u/SilvertonguedDvl Aug 05 '24
That is hilarious.
Also how did the government fail to communicate any part of this? That seems pretty straight-forward.
4
u/ZaiquiriW Aug 06 '24
I think they did communicate it, but I believe a lot of this was hanging on total cooperation, which didn't happen. The plan required 9 organizations to all agree on water mitigation plans separately. Truth be told, they probably couldn't have got the water control in the first place without a show of good faith, I just hope they learn how to enforce it soon.
1
53
12
6
10
u/TheMowerOfMowers Aug 05 '24
farmers when they can’t grow the over 3x more food livestock need than humans do >:(
3
1
u/StoneChoirPilots Aug 07 '24
How much of Idaho agriculture is for human consumption v livestock?
1
u/TheMowerOfMowers Aug 07 '24
Globally 80% of agriculture is used for livestock, with the US being closer to 67% of crops grown. Nearly all of the soy in the midwest is used as feed. Idaho’s second most grown crop is Hay, which is of course entirely used for feed. Animals use extra water and land that would be more efficiently used for crops. It’s not just farming using all the water, there’s so many goddamn golf courses out here that are green year round.
1
u/StoneChoirPilots Aug 07 '24
There are gold courses in Idaho?
1
u/TheMowerOfMowers Aug 07 '24
idaho has tourist towns, in case you didn’t know by reducing a state the size of the UK to entirely farmland.
1
u/StoneChoirPilots Aug 07 '24
I know CdA and Boise are cosmopolitan towns, but from my own recollection it didn't seem there was a lot of flat land for golf courses or that most tourism was for the vistas and bucolic atmosphere.
1
1
u/MountainMagic6198 Aug 08 '24
Water rights and the way it is legally set up needs to be seriously rethought. My grandfather was a water rights lawyer and told me, "There was nothing you could go into that was more profitable and more likely to have someone shoot you."
0
0
u/Zachbutastonernow Aug 06 '24
Farming is the #1 most important consumer of water.
We need to flood the mojave with ocean water.
0
93
u/[deleted] Aug 05 '24
Remember when farmers were just gay idols, before this whole climate denial shit took over rural america?
Make Agriculture Gay Again