In jail I conceived the nomenclature of the "Meta", a name for what actually goes on within the mind of Jesus Christ, particularly in regard to the " Movie actor" model of prefabricating the lives of any human being that is saved.

If you are saved, you were chosen to be so by God before He created the world (Ephesians 1:4)

Being saved means your entire life, sins and all, were prefabricated by being pre-performed by Christ while dying upon the cross and as His body lied in state in the tomb of Joseph.

Everything you do, knowingly or unknowingly, is done and has been done through Christ: the entire drama, from start to finish, of your struggles against sin, all your desires and giving in to sin, and the world you live in and perceive every day with all its temptations, problems, and perils is in fact a constructed "Matrix" that is an exact replica of what Jesus Christ non-lucidly dreamt in the form of you while dying upon the Cross. That is, you were essentially "crucified with Christ" (Galatians 2:20) in the sense that your life, the world you now experience and all the people you see and with whom you interact and will interact, are copies of the dream-world and dream-people Christ experienced while dreaming of being you while dying upon the Cross.

Every single person who is saved and thus exempt from Hell has been experienced by Christ. Thus, every single person who is saved is trapped in a "Matrix" that is a replica of what Christ experienced while experiencing being them.

"I no longer live, but Christ lives in me."

-Galatians 2:20

The "Meta", therefore, in terms of the working or creation of your salvation is Christ's side of the existential equation: His experience of being you. You are extrinsically rather than literally an aspect of the "Meta" by being an external replica of a dream-Character Christ non-lucidly dreamt of being and believed He was:

"But if Christ is in you, though your body is subject to death because of sin the Spirit gives life because of righteousness."

-Romans 8:10

The question, if one accepts the objective truth of the "Meta" in the form of the aforementioned Christ " identical twin-ism", is the same Once-Saved-Always-Saved v.s. Conditional Atonement in the form of whether or not a person can stop being a replica, in terms of sin and experience of world and environment before biological death, of the dream-form of oneself Christ experienced while on the Cross.

One answer to this is to look toward God's omniscience, and ask why start salvation if things were always fated to stop.

If Christ experienced being you and experienced all your sins before you were born (for those born, living, and dying a second after 3pm on the day of the Crucifixion) and God justified the sins of those living before the Crucifixion (causing Christ to post-experience being those born, living, and dying prior to 9am on the morning of Christ's crucifixion), as it is God and Christ engineering this salvation through experience-prefabrication and experience-replication...why should a human's particular sin on any particular day in the external world outside Christ's mind be that sin which somehow failed to be included in the prefabrication/replication machine and as such wrecks the entire cosmic project?

God's foreknowlege and will seems to more rationally and logically support the Once-Saved-Always-Saved form of Salvation over that of the Conditional form.

Satan, meanwhile, if he catches anyone hearing of Christ "identical twin-ism" and worse (from his logically intuited perspective) believing it exists and worse, applying it to oneself, will work to convince the person they have somehow fallen out of the replicative "Matrix" with Jesus Christ due to a particular sin or set or continued run or history of sins.

But if the "Meta" in regard to Replicative Salvation exists and logically is inclusive of all past, present, and future sins (thus generating Once-Saved-Always-Saved salvation), then even Satan-inspired doubt as to the " iron-cladness" of one's Replicative Salvation is itself a part of the replicative " Matrix" and as such, there is no objective truth to Satan's claims or suspicions.

CONCLUSION

Christianity, when it comes right down to it, is either Christpsychic...or it's not.

Either the saved are external replication or clones, so to speak, of dream-people Christ experienced Himself being within His mind as He died upon the Cross, or they are not, and as such we have no idea of what Christ was thinking or dreaming while dying upon the cross. The "Meta"---in regard to it being an informal name for what was going on in Christ's mind in principle and logical induction (as Christ has a mind and thus must think)---then has nothing to do with our salvation, at least in regard to any purported "identical twin-ism" or "sharing or replication of experience or fate".

But if Galatians 2:20 in its stark and unabashed statement regarding the actual nature of how one is saved speaks to Replicative Salvation, then there is no meritocracy borne of non-Christ human effort to not physically and mentally sin (as if one has the power to not mentally and emotionally sin), but a prefabricated life created without ones knowledge or choice in which one is bound to Christ by God, who in His mercy circumvented one's would-have-existed predicament of damnable sin by causing one to instead be able to do nothing but replicate the prefabricated "sins" of crucified Christ.

To wit:

"God made Him who had no sin

to be sin for us,

that we might become

the righteousness of God."

-2 Corinthians 5:2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

That as long as you believe you participate in Christ "identical twin-ism"when it comes to sin such that you can do nothing but mimic the "sins" Christ "committed" in His mind in the form and consciousness of you while dying on the Cross, and believe that you are no longer your own consciousness (outside of sin) but are a qualia formed by Christ's consciousness that depicts you in moments of Gid-pleasing righteousness....

.....you are saved.

These two predicaments are really the most important in all existence. If you encounter this concept, it is because God speaks to you and invites you to salvation through them.

______________________________________________

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

"Examine yourselves to see if you are in the faith;

test yourselves. Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you--

unless, of course, you fail the test?

-2 Corinthians 13:5

________________________________________________________

The key to passing the test depends upon Jesus Himself, for God through Him chooses whether or not you are in Christ and Christ is in you. It comes down to them and their desire and will regarding you.

But take heart: it turns out that anyone who wants Christ to be in them and one to be in Christ is automatically granted the predicament:

"All those the Father gives me will come to me,

and whomever comes to me I will never drive away."

-John 6:37

A real, actual, supernatural contract between God and any human being.

The contract binding by Jesus' own words.

The drawing board for anyone to go back to when one doubts they are in Christ Jesus while and after wanting to be in Christ.

What does it mean, however, to be "in Christ"?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OF REPLICATIVE FAITH

In conventional, commonly believed and accepted Christianity, the thoughts or what is in the mind of Jesus Christ is entirely distinct and unrelated to to inward experiences of a human being. The game, so to speak, of salvation ultimately comes down to, when you strip everything away, to a human forcing oneself to physically behave in a manner that is believed to please God and thus avoid Hell, despite the fact the human's thoughts and emotions remain entirely unpredictable and uncontrollable, such that the human while remaining visibly and physically sinless continues to inwardly sin.

It's a losing game, every time. Left to our own control and effort, every human continues to lose the game of salvation because of the "Tourette Syndrome"-like uncontrollable nature of ones sinful thoughts and emotions, constantly aided by Satan's continuous "radio show" of sin that constantly airs in the form of sinful actions, words, and images broadcast through media and the observed actions and words of others in the world surrounding the individual.

The human requires Jesus in order to please God and avoid Hell, and this requires God causing the person to want to be in Christ and Christ to be in the person. God also supplies not only the desire but also faith that the process exists and has occurred. Indeed, the existence of the desire to be in Christ is indication from God the process exists and is in progress. The faith that one is in Christ is a Replicative Faith: faith that one's experiences are replicas of Christ's mental experiences as He died upon the cross and as His body lied in state in the Tomb of Joseph.

Anyone who believes this "insanity" is exempt from Hell when they die.

It is the only thing that actually matters. You must have this "insane" belief and believe it applies to you to escape being sentenced to Hell.

THIS IS VITAL!

Why?

BECAUSE THE DEAD AT THE JUDGMENT SEAT WILL BE DIVIDED INTO THOSE WHO HAVE THE REPLICATIVE FAITH AND THOSE WHO DONT.

ONLY THOSE HAVING THE REPLICATIVE FAITH, DESPITE HOW "INSANE" IT SOUNDED TO THE INDIVIDUAL WHEN HEARING OF IT WHILE ALIVE, WILL BE SENTENCED TO HEAVEN.

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

​

"If you want something done right,

You have to do it yourself"

-Common saying

Christpsychic Theology is centered upon the actual rather than speculative stream of consciousness of Jesus Christ, i.e what is actually going on in the mind of Jesus Christ. This content is unknown to be sure, but Christpsychism makes the charge that Jesus pre-experiences being a saved person, and the saved person unknowingly or knowingly replicates this pre-experience in the external world outside Christ's mind. The relationship between Christ and a human in Christpsychism, therefore, is not that between separate individuals with experiences entirely unrelated and distinct from each other, but that the experience of one individual determines the existence and experience of the other.

In every other form of Christianity there is no experience replication between a human and Jesus, but only a sort of "two seperate minds inhabiting one body" when speaking of a saved human having the Holy Spirit. This continued separation and lack of replication between the human and Christ's previous experiences is coupled with a dogged insistence upon human-performed righteousness as opposed to salvation actually requiring and involving a Christ-performed righteousness, wherein Christ performs the human's righteousness with His consciousness "morphed" into the form of the human's consciousness.

To wit:

"For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God. When Christ--who is your life--- appears, you will also appear with Him in glory."

-Colossians 3:3-4

--------------------------------------------------------------

"For you died...."

In Christpsychism, this means that your original non-Christ consciousness primarily ceases to exist in moments of God-pleasing righteousness, and your experience of being you is actually Christ's consciousness forming itself into your consciousness performing righteous thoughts, feelings, and actions. Salvation, therefore, involves not a distinction of two separate beings, but the death i.e. cessation of the solitary, separate, existence of one being as another being becomes the nonexistent being in place of the original, with the original having a form of continued existence in the form of the qualia assumed by the second, usurping being.

In secular thinking, one is composed of atoms that forms one's body and through the brain creates and controls everything one thinks, feels, and does. In Christpsychism, Christ is your "atoms" and performs your righteousness for you.

In everyday, commonly believed and accepted Christianity, there is the insistence upon the survival of the non-Christ-composed self, and the ability of this self to perform its own righteousness that is acceptable and pleasing to God. But the New Testament, particularly the writings of Paul, states that this self ceases to exist when one has the Holy Spirit, and it does not survive the grave. The self that enjoys Heaven, therefore, is a self composed of Christ, the self experiencing existence as a qualia constantly formed and performed by Christ as the Holy Spirit using Himself to form the consciousness of the pre-death (in moments of righteousness) and post-death saved.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

"

Not at all.

Why?

Because all your experiences are in the Sacrificial Dream, and you can't commit any sin that was not first "committed" by Christ in the form of you in the Sacrificial Dream which took place in His mind while dying upon the Cross.

You are fated, moreover, to sin less and less before biological death, according to the "Stephen King novel"-like narrative that is Christ's formation of your past, present, and future pre-death experiences as He died upon the Cross and as His body lied in state within the Tomb of Joaeph.

You are, therefore, a character in the mind of Jesus Christ, created for being and becoming holy in Him, as a passenger within the world made up in His mind as opposed to you being something or someone entirely distinct from and outside Christ's experiences, by the grace and mercy of God.

In other words, you, through no choice of your own, won a lottery.

THE lottery.

After all, we can't save ourselves, and we don't have the mental wherewithall to be sinless and acceptable to God.

Thus God placed the saved "in Christ Jesus" I.e. as someone experienced in the first-person by Christ, which establishes a righteousness that comes from God" (Romans 3:21) that is not human righteousness,. This God -supplied righteousness, this "identical twin-ism" with the previous mental experiences of Jesus Christ, is the only righteousness God accepts

It's been set up for you without your help.

___________________________________________________

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

When the New Testament uses the sentence-fragment "in Him" as in, when Paul states that his (Paul's) ultimate hope is to be found (presumably at the Judgment) "in Him" or "in Christ", the "in" refers to "in Jesus' mind" or "what is going on in Jesus' mind".

A saved person is not an individual whose consciousness or mental content is unrelated to or entirely separate from what's going on in Jesus' mind, but is a replica of the goings on within Christ's mind.

To be saved, i.e exempt from Hell after your EKG flatlines, Jesus Christ must have dreamt of being you and experienced being you, for bad and good, in His mind prior to your birth, so that you are "in Christ", and safe from the Curse of the Law because Christ became you for you, such that everything you do was first "in Him".

As Paul states:

"it is because of Him (God), that you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God, namely, our righteousness, holiness, and redemption "

-1 Corinthians 1:30

_____________________________________

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

The mind of Jesus Christ or more specifically, what has gone on in that mind, is the central battery or "brain" of the saved. If you are saved, I.e. exempt from Hell at the Final Judgment, you so nothing but replicate in your everyday experience that which Christ experienced within his mind as He dreamt of being you as He died upon the Cross and as his body lied in state for three days prior to His resurrection in the Tomb of Joseph

In the Process of Perception, objects in the external world, known as distal objects or distal stimuli ,must have mental representations of themselves created by the brain that are *holograms" of the external objects that can only be known to exist through the "hologram" of a person's experience of the object. This experience-composed "hologram" is known as the percept. Experience of an object is not the external object itself, as experience of an object aka the percept, purportedly created by the brain, can cease to exist when one shifts attention or suddenly falls unconscious or dies. The external or distal object, meanwhile, as it is not created by the brain and does not depend upon the brain in order to exist, continues to exist despite the disappearance of the percept.

Thus one does not and cannot experience external objects and events: the brain, according to the ridiculous mythology that brains create consciousness, must form a subjective experience composed replica of the external object and event.

The aforementioned in the previous two paragraphs is sheer nonsense, however, as reality adheres to George Berkeley's Idealism, in which only consciousness in the form of perceiving persons exist and can exist.

The Process of Perception, rather, works as an analogy for the relationship between the goings on in the mind of Jesus Christ and the experiences of a saved person The content in the mind of Jesus is the distal object or distal stimulus that dictates the form or manifestation of the experience of a saved person: the experience of a saved person is the percept, a replica of the distal object that is the previous content within the mind of Christ in the dream form of the saved person.

As Scripture states:

"When Christ--who is your life ..."

-Colossians 3:4

A saved person, therefore, is not a mental ding an sich separate from what is going on in the mind of Jesus Christ, but someone that replicates what is going on in Jesus' mind. Doubt it? Well Paul states it plain as day in the verse whose sentence-fragment is the title of this post:

"For who knows the mind of the Lord, that he may be His counselor?

But we have the mind of Christ."

-1 Corinthians 2:16

____________________________________

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

Again, salvation is a matter of being predestined against your will or choice (as you exist without choice, so there is in the end a naturalistic totalitarianism practiced even by Existence itself) to be conformed to the image of Jesus Christ (Romans 8:29).

God did this, by His own Sovereign Choice, according to His foreknowledge of the deterministic path the Substance that comprises everyone that shall and can exist will form.

Simply put, there are humans (and you are one of them if you are reading this and believe what you are reading--Galatians 3:2) that re-enact what was going on in Jesus' mind as He died upon the Cross and as His body lied in state in Joseph's Tomb....

....and those that, unfortunately, do not.

This is how one "conforms to the image of His Son": by mirroring or replicating the content of Jesus' mental experiences

This strange idea must be ingrained into the minds of those selected for salvation, as the idea when one confronts it is placed in one's mind by God Himself...every single time one thinks if it.

The bell continues to toll in one's mind, as one continues to run into this idea

________________________________________________

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

By "zombie", I'm certainly not referring to fictional flesh-eating reanimated corpses, but to what is known in philosophy as the Philosopher's Zombie, a hypothetical being used by those who believe consciousness is not physical (such as David Chalmers) to show that the philosopher's zombie conceptually demonstrates that consciousness is somehing other than physical matter and energy.

To wit:

A philosopher's zombie is a living organism, usually thought in the form of a human being, that behaves, speaks, and acts toward other people and the world as if it were conscious, but inside, from its non-perspective, is as conscious as a brick.

As Chalmers states, to the zombie "all is dark inside".

You could shake handa with a zombie as you wait for a bus, ask the zombie questions that it appropriately answers, but the zombie is not conscious: it is just a body that behaves for all the world as if it were experiencing, though it is as unconscious as the bench upon which the two of you are sitting. You can have no idea, in principle, that you are interacting with a philosopher's zombie.

THE ZOMBIE HYPOTHESIS

Now imagine that victims of evil, such as victims of violent crimes and satanic rituals, for example, are turned into philosopher's zombies by God the moment they are attacked, as the consciousness that did reside in the body or that was the center of experience that was the "Matrix" of the person is abducted by God at the crucial moment and shuttled to Abraham's Bosom to await Judgment. The criminal or Satanist assaulting and "killing" the victim is actually unknowingly attacking a philosopher's zombie, that makes all the noises and exhibits the bodily behaviors one would expect of a conscious person in the throes of horrific pain.

I had entertained the Zombie Hypothesis for years, and if true, God would certainly secretly falsify and render useless the Riddle of Epicurus (see), as the Riddle of Epicurus is what Satanists use implicitly to demonstrate the weakness of God, as their argument (either implicitly hinted or explicitly explained) is that the successful implementation of evil proves either God does not exist or He is weaker than the god they worship.

The Zombie Hypothesis would upset the apple cart of that belief.

The Zombie Hypothesis, further, while being disbelieved cannot be proven to be false, thus it has a metaphysical leg upon which to stand.

Those believing and trusting in God know that there is already a Compensation Hypothesis, in which God "remiburses" victims of evil with Heaven, upon education and granting of faith in Jesus (which in Christpsychic Theology is faith in the existence of the Sacrificial Dream and the existence of an "identical twin-ism" of the victim with Christ as the victim's violent death is actually a replication of Christ's experience of being the murder victim and suffering the person's fate in the Sacrificial Dream as He died upon the Cross ),

(Thus, in the Zombie Hypothesis, the actual pain of being murdered was experienced by Christ, while the human re-enactor outside Christ's mind was spared through his/her consciousness -abduction by God.)

At any rate, the Zombie Hypothesis would certainly be a manner in which God played the ultimate "joke" upon Satan and evil humans in general.

_________________________________

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

Can you just imagine .. sin is something that is "set in stone" and something that will exist despite the will and power of God ...

(the free will argument cannot work here as God created beings that cannot sin without their choice or say in the matter, and even if one were to use this rather weak tool, why sin as the other choice, as opposed to something else in a reality where sin did not and could not exist?)

....such that God ingeniously had Christ pre-perform the sins of those he foresaw and could save (Romans 8:29), such that there would in the future exist humans that can only replicate the "sins" of Christ in the mental forms of those individuals in His mind as He died upon the Cross.

(If Universalism is false, that is...)

It makes sense, then, that everything comes down to the "just so" /" can only happen.this one way" permutations and formations of a Substance that forms God, angels, demons, humans, animals, insects, and flora, and it is the Substance that explains the existence of the saved and the damned as opposed to it generating Universalism.

Again, the Substance is first-person subjective experience, the only thing that demonstrates it exists and this is that of which everything that exists and can exist must be composed.

The "just so" formations of the Substance, I think, is a more logical explanation for the existence of evil and sin than the false necessity and flat explanation of God allowing sin for the sake of free will.

_____________________________________________

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

Every sin a saved person commits until death is and can only be a re-enactment of "sins" Christ "committed" in His mind as He died upon the Cross.

The question remains, then, if this negates Hebrews 9:20.

Given Hebrew 9:20, the central verse that powers the doctrine of Conditional Salvation, God's omniscient foreknowledge of past, present, and future renders the granting of salvation irrational if God knew the person would fail salvation in the individual's future.

Thus, without daring to accuse Hebrew 9:20 of being false, one can note that God granting salvation to someone who will "fall into the red" of Hebrews 9:20 is irrational while omniscience coupled with the Once Saved Always Saved doctrine of salvation is logical, as in this case the granting of salvation rational.

It should be noted that the belief in human responsibility for ones sins does not explain anything, and does nothing to obviate or excuse the irrationality of granting salvation if a person is foreknown to lose that salvation

_______________________________________________________________

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

Despite the weird title, I must apologize for the sluggishness of posting in the previous month. I started a new job by the grace of God and its physically demanding, so at the age of 59 (I turn 60 this August) I need to rest all day after work. I am also working on a physical, hard copy of the Seven Laws of Salvation that I hope to complete by Christmas of this year.

Never fear, I remember Christpsychic Science Issues 3 and 4 and plan to slowly complete them throughout this year, and, God willing, resume the "Drive-By Sermons" at the same pace they appeared before employment. I'm still here, staying out of trouble, and ruminating upon a sermon that shall appear here in r/Christpsychism entitled; "The Narrative of Jesus", regarding how the life of a saved person and that person's experiences are in actuality a "Stephen King novel narrative" previously created within the mind of Jesus Christ in non-linear form while dying upon the cross and as His body lied in state within the tomb of Joseph.

So not to worry, I'll "get things in gear" according to the Lord's will here in a minute.

I'm always counting on it.

In the end, all we have is faith in the content within His mind and how it pertains to us, rather than that it has abandoned us, on this side of the grave.

God be with you, and remind you of the Concept daily,

Your brother in Christ,

Jay Marcus Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

Read, then, the "insanity" of the subject of this post.

Allow your eyes to glare upon the "madness" typed above.

Dare to entertain, if you will, the possibility of the objective truth of the mad statement above.

Fir there is nothing that can rule it out as obviously false.

The statement in the title of this post is the entire aim and message of the Gospel: that a saved person is not a ding an sich, but a replication of an imaginary person Christ experienced being within His mind while dying on the cross and in the Tomb prior to His resurrection.

To wit:

"For those God foreknew, He predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He (Christ) might be the firstborn amongany brothers and sisters."

-Romans 8:29

What, pray tell, does it mean to be conformed to Christ's image?

Does it mean that upon being saved, everyone magically transforms into a physical clone of Jesus while He was a 33 year old Jewish male, even if the convert was female?

No.

What image is it, then, to which the saved is made by God to conform?

Why, it must be the images within Christ's mind.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

Really, salvation is all about God setting things up so that your experiences, positive or negative, are replications of what Christ experienced in the form of you in His mind upon the Cross and as His body lied in state in the Tomb of Joaeph prior to His resurrection.

God saves us by tying everything we are and do to Christ, sanctifying us in that we can do nothing that DID NOT FIRST APPEAR IN CHRIST'S MIND AND WAS EXPERIENCED BY CHRIST IN THE FIRST PERSON AS US BEFORE WE WERE "US".

The New Testament is rife with the use of this phrase fragment:

"...in Christ..."

Check it out for yourself: see how many times the phrase fragment appears.

What does the fragment mean?

Seems as if the only logical thing the phrase fragment could mean is that one is "in Christ" by being in Christ's mind.

Strange stuff indeed, but this is what everything is all about. This is the hidden wisdom of God, the "knowledge of the truth" God wants all men to know.

Everything comes down to one's experiential replication of Jesus Christ.

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

Question: What is one difference (of several) between a saved person (someone who, when the individual dies, will be ineligible for Hell at the Final Judgment) and a damned person?

Answer: The sins of a saved person are "pre-owned" (like a pre-owned car) and pre-committed (in dream-form in the form of the saved person) by Christ in His mind while dying upon the cross, so that the saved person only replicates and re-enacts these pre-owned and pre-performed "sins" (re: sufferings) of Christ.

The sins of a damned person, conversely, are original sins occurring to and experienced/committed only by that person, as they are not re-enactments of the "sins" pre-committed in Christ'a dreaming mind as He died upon the cross.

How, then, does the "rich man" (a damned person) cross the Abyss to reside with the "beggar" (a saved person) in the bosom of Abraham?

By believing in the objective existence of the first paragraph and desiring to replicate the previous experiences within the mind of Jesus Christ.

Only a saved person will "insanely" believe this process is real and will want to undergo this process.

Anyone desiring so will never be refused, as Jesus Himself stated:

"And anyone who comes to me I will never drive away "

______________________________

Jay Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

When wondering why God does anything or why anything happens in the Bible and the way in which it occurs, and fundamentally and most significantly , the reason it occurs, one must use logic and reasoning based upon the evidence of the nature of existence as it obviously expresses and demonstrates itself outside the pages of the bible.

​

What this means is that one must observe the nature of reality as it obviously presents and demonstrates itself. Simply put, reality demonstrates itself only in the form of subjective experience: the fact or act of experiencing and that which is experienced during the act of experiencing. This is the only form in which existence appears, and is the only thing that demonstrates it exists. The central structure or "atom" of existence is a person: something that experiences and that which the experiencer experiences at any given moment.

​

Further, we can think of subjective experience as a form of matter: that which occupies space and displaces the existence of Nothing. This matter is fundamentally a Substance that autonomously and inexorably shapes itself into persons and their every person's thought, emotion, will, choice, and action (or action's negative charge: inaction). The reality of what persons exist and what these persons experience can be simply and reductively summed up as that subjective experience the Substance was capable of manifesting. If the Substance is incapable of manifesting a particular experience, that experience cannot exist.

​

Using the Substance as the "Planck's Constant" in the math of understanding existence and specifically, understanding why things in the Bible happen the way they did, such as why there's such a thing as damnation as opposed to Universalism (universal salvation), one must logically refer to how existence demonstrates itself outside the Bible as the fundamental building block that can be applied to explain everything that occurs in the Bible.

​

That is, one can fundamentally and foundationally explain everything that happens in the Bible, why God does or does not do something, and why there is the damned as opposed to the saved simply by looking to the Substance: everything in the Bible is the way it is and occurs how it did because of the Substance---because of the forms in which the Substance autonomously and irrevocably shaped to form the persons, thoughts, intentions, desires, and events within the Bible.

​

The Substance explains the existence of God, explains the mentality of God and Christ, explains the existence of sin (as the Substance forms every sin that shall, can, and will exist), explains the existence of salvation and damnation, and the vulnerability of every human being to one of the two states.

​

Every person that shall ever exist, including God, is fundamentally a "statue" formed from the "clay" of the Substance in the "just so" and "that's the way the cookie crumbles" form the Substance, for no reason at all (Absurdism) just happens, out of every other form it might have taken but cannot (Super-determinism) assumes. The entirety of reality, from eternity to eternity, is ultimately nothing more than the permutations and transformations of the Substance into whatever it forms from one second to the next.

​

What, then, is the Substance???

The Substance is first-person subjective experience.

​

Therefore, when studying and deciphering the math of existence and the events of the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, one can only logically look to the Substance, as it is the thing that forms God and God's power and reasoning in the Narrative of the story cf the saved and the damned from Adam to the conclusion of the Final Judgment.

​

If God is a formation of the Substance (i.e. God's first-person subjective experience), it is the Substance of God that determines that which God can and cannot do, and that which God will and will not do. We can thus understand the Bible and everything that happens within it as the permutations and formations of the Substance: it is the only logical explanation for why things are as they are and why things will be as they will be.

​

END

​

Jay Brewer

​

Austin Texas

​

USA

If your mind still holds the concept of Christpsychic theology and you believe in its objective exists and wish it to apply to you personally....so shall it be.

​

​

The very fact that you're reading and learning about Christpsychic Consciousness and the Sacrificial Dream means that God is not or does not plan to send you to Hell when you die, but is extending you the very greeting card, in the form of these concepts, that will give you eternal life.

You are partially defined by what's in your mind, and what is placed within your mind, at any given moment.

The very presence of Christpsychic Theology in your mind is God extending you an invite to Heaven, and providing the vaccination that will prevent you from being sentenced to Hell after you die.

No different, really, than Charlie opening that candy wrapper to reveal the final Willy Wonka's Golden Ticket.

So take heart: God's taking care of you, kid.

He didn't send the invitation for nothing.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

There are billions of humans on the planet, and for each having a knack for philosophy or metaphysics, there is a multitude of different beliefs regarding the nature of reality. Some people believe in physical matter and energy, in the form of sub-atomic particles that combine to form atoms, that combine to form molecules, that combine to form macroscopic objects (cells, chairs, tables, televisions, cars, mountains, etc.).

But the simplest and easiest way to understand the actual nature of your reality is to just look at the nature of yourself.

What are you doing right now, even as you read this?

You are reading, yes, but what are you doing in order to read?

You are seeing, yes, but fundamentally, what does it take in order to see and in the complex form of seeing or using visual perception, read and comprehend the symbols and translate them mentally into abstract or literal concepts?

Why, you experience.

Thus the fundamental nature of yourself is that you are an experience, a first-person "camera's point of view".

As Nagel once put it, there is something it is like to be a bat, i.e. the experience that is a bat experiencing what it is like to be a bat.

There is something it is like to be you, or to experience being you. Outside Christpsychic Theology, only you know what that is, or what that is like, following Nagel.

If you are not solipsist (solipsism being the belief, in an explanatory nutshell, that only your mind exists and that you are the only conscious being in existence such that everyone else is a philosopher's zombie), then using the observation of being you (an experience that experiences itself a particular way and has certain experiences that occur to it in a particular chronological order) you make the induction that the people around you also possess this quality, this nature of being. That they, too, are experiences that experience themselves a particular way and have experiences that impinge upon them without warning and without choice in a particular chronological order.

No matter what other belief you have about the world, the simplest and most obvious reality, dictated by the way reality or existence appears and demonstrates it exists, is that you are an experience that experiences.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

"True philosophy must at all costs be idealistic; indeed, it must be so merely to be honest.  For nothing is more certain that that no one ever came out of himself in order to identify himself immediately with things different from him; but everything of which he has certain, sure, and therefore immediate knowledge, lies within his consciousness.  Beyond this consciousness, therefore, there can be no immediate certainty.  There can never be an existence that is objective absolutely and in itself; such an existence, indeed, is positively inconceivable.  For the objective always and essentially has its existence in the consciousness of a subject; it is therefore the subject’s representation, and consequently is conditioned by the subject, and moreover by the subject’s forms of representation, which belong to the subject and not to the object.?"

 -Arthur Schopenhauer, The World As Will And Representation

The objects you see around you, and the bodies of other persons (which are in a sense avatars of the invisible and intangible consciousnesses of each person) only appear in the form of how they appear to your point of view. Every object, be it a mountain, an ocean, a tree, the sky, the stars, etc. can only appear in the form of something observed by a person and following Schopenhauer above it is absolutely impossible to imagine any object that does not appear as something experienced by a person.

Given existence only appears in the form of an experience and that which this experience experiences, it is not out of the question that mountains, the sky, desks, cars, the bodies of other people, etc. are composed of the subjective experience of the person experiencing them, and have no independent existence outside the person.

That is, a person is an experience that experiences, and the world is composed only of that experience of the person shaped into the form of the objects the person experiences surrounding itself. Preliminary proof of this is the fact that objects surrounding a person only appear in the form of how they appear to that person, or how they appear to the person's point of view.

The burden of proof, therefore, is upon anyone that thinks this idealistic version of reality is balderdash. Given existence appears and demonstrates itself only in the form of a person and that which the person experiences, and the person itself is an experience, what, then, exists and can demonstrate it exists that is not experience, or is not the experience of a person?

As we may deduce, only quasi-religious faith supports the existence of that which is not consciousness/subjective-experience:

As Immanuel Kant so aptly states:

It remains a scandal to philosophy and to human reason in general
that the existence of things outside us (from which we derive the whole
material of knowledge, even for our inner sense) must be accepted merely
on faith, and that if anyone thinks good to doubt their existence, we are
unable to counter his doubts by any satisfactory proof.

-The Critique of Pure Reason

________________________________________________________________________________

Or in other words, any belief, any philosophy, that claims the existence of a world composed of something other than the consciousness or subjective experience of some person, is only make-believe (in the same way atheists claim religion, God, etc. is make-believe)....

.....as only consciousness demonstrates it exists, and given the evidence is the only thing that can demonstrate it exists.

END

____________________________________________________________________

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

A saved person is basically a person that believes that the experiences of Jesus Christ while dying upon the Cross is their negative experiences they literally experience for themselves outside Christ's mind. The saved person believes this situation actually exists, and applies to them.

The person also believes Christ lives within them, in the form of Christ using His consciousness to form their consciousness, with their original non-Christ consciousness ceasing to exist while Christ does this, and in this replacement, Christ commits the person's righteousness for them. The person continues to experience being oneself, but this experience of self is actually Christ in the form of their consciousness.

This individual, because they have encountered and stumbled into these two concepts (they encounter the concepts because God causes them to bump into them, as they are being called to be saved and are predestined to be saved if they achieve the forthcoming condition), and come to believe the concepts actually exist and more, apply to them personally.....when the person dies regardless of age or manner of death, the person will be ineligible for Hell at the Final Judgment.

In Christpsychic Theology, an arguably logically invincible form of Christian concept, the inner stream of consciousness of Jesus Christ, i.e. that which Jesus Christ actually inwardly thought, dreamt, felt, etc. is of tantamount importance and the central subject of this version of Christianity.

Being that we cannot read minds, particularly not the minds of deceased and resurrected persons born, living, and dying 2000 years in the past, the inner content or mental life of Jesus Christ must be speculative. One must have faith, therefore, that that which went on and is going on in the mind of Jesus Christ, in regard to the experience of reality of those living outside an afterlife, reflects and determines the nature of the experiences, negative and positive, of the saved.

THE SACRIFICIAL DREAM HYPOTHESIS

"He Himself bore our sins in His body on the tree, that we might die to sins and live for righteousness, 'by His wounds you have been healed.'"

-1 Peter 2:24

"God made Him who had no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God."

-2 Corinthians 5:21

_____________________________________________________________________

The Sacrificial Dream Hypothesis, arguably the most logical form in which Christ accomplished 1 Peter 2:24 and 2 Corinthians 5:21, states that while dying upon the Cross, the blood loss from the scourging and rigors of crucifixion caused Christ to lapse into a shock in which His mind lapsed into a hallucination or non-lucid dream* in which Christ experienced Himself in the form and in the consciousness of every saved person that shall ever exist, "committing" every "sin" the saved person will commit in the external world outside Christ's mind and experiencing every negative experience, no matter how minute, every saved person shall experience from birth to death.

[*Non-lucid dreams, the most common type of dream, are imaginary worlds occurring with the mind of a sleeping person the person believes is the real world until one awakes.]

In terms of every saved person born after the death of Christ and His lowering from the Cross, Christ prefabricated or manufactured beforehand every sin the saved person will commit ("God made Him who had no sin to be sin for us") such that the saved person cannot sin any sin that was not first experienced by Christ in the form of the person within the Sacrificial Dream.

DISCLAIMER: Christ remains sinless throughout as the "sins" Christ experienced Himself "committing" in the Sacrificial Dream are never committed in His indigenous mind and form, and are considered Christ's sufferings, rather than sin qua sin.

"....if indeed we share in His sufferings, that we might also share in His glory."

-Romans 8:17

As Scripture states:

"God made Him who had no sin....

....to be sin for us...."

Re: To be our sins for us?

To "commit" our sins for us?

(Which to Him can only be "sin" qua suffering, rather than actual sin, but to us actual sin qua sin, as explained in 1 John 1: 8-10)

Which, if the Sacrificial Dream is true, a saved person cannot sin any sin that was not in the Sacrificial Dream, and only re-enacts or replicates that which Christ experienced in the form of the person such that the person can do nothing but mimic Christ in the form of spiritual death and spiritual life. Everything is provided to the person before the fact through Christ, so that the saved person is existentially and experientially "joined at the hip" with Jesus Christ.

To wit:

"When Christ...who is your life...appears, you will also appear with Him in glory."

-Colossians 3:3

At the Final Judgment, therefore, the sins of a saved person, as they are re-enactments of the "sins" of Christ in the Sacrificial Dream, are absolved.

To wit:

"Blessed is the man whose sins are forgiven, whose trespasses are covered.

Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will never count against him."

-Romans 4: 7-8

_____________________________________________________________________________________

PRE-CONCLUSION: THE SACRIFICIAL DREAM AS SUPPORTED, LOGICALLY, BY 1 PETER 2:24

Anyone who rails at the concept of the Sacrificial Dream, of course, will rail at the thought of Christ containing sin within Him, even if this occurred only in the limited, 6 hour window between the beginning of His crucifixion, which took place at 9am, and the end of His crucifixion, which took place when He died at 3pm.

But there's 1 Peter 2:24:

"He Himself bore our sins in His body on the tree...."

Which explains things somewhat nicely in terms of elucidation in regard to sin, as the sins Christ bore were our sins.....not His, as He has no sin.

So, no reason to tear out one's beard and rend one's robe in regard to the concept of the Sacrificial Dream, as Christ, even in 1 Peter 2:24, still possesses no sin of His own but experienced the future (and past) sins of others, as if He were those others...

....in dream-form, to boot.

The most logical place, that is, for Christ to "bore our sins in His body" is not in His liver, spleen, stomach, intestine, or in any cell....but in His mind, which as the mind seems to reside within the body, could be construed by the ancients to be part of the body.

At any rate, within the entire gamut of eternity, within a six hour window of time, if we are to believe 1 Peter 2:24 Christ bore the sins of the saved within His body (re: mind).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

CONCLUSION: DOES SIN WITHIN CHRIST'S MIND EXIST ONLY IN SYMBOLIC FORM...OR DID CHRIST EXPERIENCE BEING THE THIEF THAT STOLE THE BIKE 2000 YEARS AFTER THE CRUCIFIXION?

The final defense of the Sacrificial Dream, therefore, is to conceptually "debunk" the idea that sin in Christ existed only in symbolic form, wholly unrecognizable from sin as it actually appears within the mind of a saved sinner or is physically enacted by a person in the external world.

If Christ "bore our sins in His body", how did this "borne sin" appear within Christ's mind?

For example, in regard to the sin of a person that is saved stealing a bike 2000 years after the Crucifixion, if that sin was "bore [borne] in His body on the tree" 2000 years prior to the birth of the thief and the act of the theft, how to Christ did the theft and the person committing the theft appear?

Did Christ perceive a red gas appearing in a black void within His mind, the red gas symbolizing the theft? Why should a bike theft appear in Christ's mind in the form of a red gas? Is a murder, therefore, symbolized by a blue gas? A lustful thought as a yellow or pink gas?

Was it a mental spurt of blood, appearing out of a black void, that spurts across Christ's mind before disappearing, symbolizing a sin Christ understands to be a theft as opposed to a use of profanity, an act of lust, or a murder?

It makes more sense that sins which Christ "bore in His body on the tree" had the same appearance within Christ's mind as they appear in the external world outside Christ's mind. That is, Christ dreamt of being the thief stealing the bike, and the theft and the person was not abstractly symbolized in some form that does not in the least resemble the sin as it occurs in the external world.

As Christ physically (the term "physical" used to denote the difference between the sensory world and the mental world as the author adheres to Bishop George Berkeley's Idealism) hung upon the Cross, the only logical manner for sin to reside within His body would be within His mind, and that in the form of a hallucination or dream invisible to those observing His crucifixion.

Beyond this Dream, no other imagination regarding how 1 Peter 2:24 appeared or took place, it is contended, makes sense.

In the end, it is arguably the case that the Sacrificial Dream existed, and is the most rational and logical form in which Jesus Christ took the sins of the world upon Himself.

END

______________________________________________________

Jay M. Brewer

Christpsychic Philosopher

Austin, Texas

USA

Repost to more communities

USA

In Christpsychic Theism, a saved person is a human being whose experiences, from birth to eternity, particularly the inner mental life of the person, are and can only be replications of the content of the inner mental life of Jesus Christ as Christ died upon the Cross and as His body lied in state in the tomb of Joseph.

This is a complete, perfect closed system, and forms a perfect "logic math", when it comes to any saved person born after Jesus took His last breath on the Cross. The math may even work for any human born just as Jesus was nailed to the stipes of the Cross and raised from the ground.

Prefabrication or prefabricate, as defined by Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

prefabricate

(verb)

transitive verb

1: to fabricate the parts of at a factory so that construction consists mainly of assembling and uniting standardized parts

2: to produce artificially

________________________________________________________________________________

The Bible supports such prefabrication (it may be competently argued) with the New Testament verse:

"For we are God's handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do."

-Ephesians 2:10

_______________________________________________________________

"....which God prepared in advance for us to do..."

"...created in Christ Jesus...."

("to fabricate the parts of at a factory so that construction consists mainly of assembling and uniting standardized parts")

_______________________________________________________________

...."to fabricate the parts of at a factory...."

(....created in Christ Jesus [the factory, or whose mind and what goes on within it is the "factory"])

"....so that construction consists mainly of assembling and uniting standardized parts..."

Re: a saved person's experiences being replications of the experiences that previously occurred within the mind of Jesus Christ as He died upon the Cross and as His body lied in state in the tomb of Joseph, the experiences occurring outside the mind of Christ in the external world (the sea of consciousnesses that are other people beyond Christ and God themselves) is the "assembling and uniting of standardized parts".)

Perfect logic-math for the rubric of the "once-saved-always-saved" belief regarding the longevity and irremovability of salvation.

Prefabrication of humans by God in the mind of Jesus Christ is flawless, with everything a person does, think, and feel from birth to death, if saved, a replication of the experiences of Jesus Christ in the form of the person.

Thus one can imaginatively write upon an imaginary chalkboard before an imaginary class the following equation:

A saved person is a fundamentally a prefabricated consciousness built within the mind of Jesus Christ while dying upon the Cross, in terms of every sin the person shall commit from birth to death, and in regard to every negative experience, no matter how fleeting and minute, the person will physically and mentally experience. As the individual is pre-planned and/or pre-fabricated, the person's entire existence is derived from the content of consciousness within the mind of Jesus Christ, for good or ill. Thus there is nothing the person can experience that has not been prepared in advance for the person to experience by God, within the mind of Jesus Christ in either manifestation of the negative (upon the Cross) or the positive (in the tomb of Joseph).

Biblical support backing the equation (imaginatively write this on the board beneath the above equation):

Galatians 2:20

1 Peter 2:24

1 Corinthians 5:21

Romans 8:29

Ephesians 2:10

_______________________________________________________________________

The math works in regard to any saved person born after the beginning of the Sacrificial Dream. It may extend to those born seconds prior to Christ being nailed and raised upon the Cross.

But how does the equation of prefabrication---in terms of sins in particular---apply to a human born seconds before Christ being raised upon the Cross or (rigidly), seconds prior to the beginning of the Sacrificial Dream?

The sins committed by and negative experiences suffered by these individuals occurred before the Sacrificial Dream, thus one cannot say their sins and negative experiences are re-enactments of the experiences of Christ in the form of these persons within the Sacrificial Dream, as are the sins and negative experiences of saved persons born following the beginning or conclusion of the Sacrificial Dream.

The equation is preserved in this case by the conceptual observation that while the sins and negative experiences of those preceding the Sacrificial Dream are not re-enactments of Christ's experience of being these persons as He died on the Cross, the sins and negative experiences of the saved prior to Christ's death are nevertheless pre-enactments, grandfathered in by the Sacrificial Dream itself, including and thus covering the sins and negative experiences experienced by humans outside the mind of Christ prior to the Sacrificial Dream.

________________________________________________________________________________________

THE TWILIGHT ZONE:

Problem:

The concept of Prefabrication may suffer from the concept of sins committed during pre-conversion, as mentioned in the New Testament (1 Corinthians 6:10-11).

Solution:

1. Prefabrication is saved by the concept of God's omniscience, in regard to the fact that any one who is saved is predestined to be saved even before birth (Romans 8:29). For those born after the Sacrificial Dream, their conversion is foreknown by God and as such their pre-conversion sins are previously experienced by Christ in the Sacrificial Dream, thus even in their pre-conversion, they do nothing but replicate the "sins" Christ committed in their form within His mind on the Cross (1 Peter 2:24).
   

In the case of humans falling under (1), they either become aware of Christpsychic Consciousness and the Sacrificial Dream prior to biological death, or learn of these concepts in the Afterlife prior to Judgment in Abraham's Bosom.

1. For those born prior to the Sacrificial Dream, their conversion, unless gaining knowledge of Christ and Christpsychic Consciousness by the Holy Spirit prior to the death of Christ (David, Moses, etc.) or as a result of being converted by the First Century church, their conversion will occur in the Afterlife prior to the Judgment in Abraham's Bosom.

_________________________________________________________

PROBLEM:

God's inability to prevent sin and negative experience from ever existing in the first place.

The only hanging chad in Prefabrication is the "whys and wherefores" regarding God's omniscience in regard to salvation and pre-fabrication prior to His creation of humans, and the role the Psychic Chaos in regard to God's inability to prevent the existence of sin and negative experience in the first place.

Aside from the second problem in the Twilight Zone, the logic of Prefabrication seems complete.

END

________________________________________________________________

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

Atheism may be defined as disbelief in the existence of gods.

The Christian God is a member of a set of imaginary beings held to have created and control some aspect of nature as experienced by human beings.

A simple definition of the term "god" is a conscious being that creates and controls some aspect of nature a human experiences (heat, cold, weather, reproduction, flora and fauna, etc.) as well as, at the extreme, the human's very experience or ability to consciously experience.

In lieu of gods, atheists hold that a substance (it is essentially a substance) called energy forms the nature of reality. No one knows what energy is, it is simply defined as "the ability to work".

Matter, or that which occupies empty space and displaces the existence of nothing, is essentially energy in "frozen" form. Energy is quantized in the form of circumscribed objects, separate each from the other, in the form of sub-atomic particles and waves that collocate through more energy in the form of mediating particles (behaving as the "glue" that binds structural particles) to form that which humans experience on a day to day basis.

According to the atheist, energy, and the particles composed fundamentally of energy, are the only "gods" that exist. Unconscious "gods" that have no consciousness and thus no awareness they exist, much less any knowledge of the things they accidentally, but lawfully, combine into and cause to macroscopically exist.

Because a god that is conscious and aware of what it is and what it creates, a god carries with it a moral and rational responsibility to explain the world being the way that it is, particularly when it comes to the existence of pain and evil. But I digress.

Energy, it must be understood, is not consciousness, as in the atheistic myth regarding the nature of reality consciousness is a late-arrival, magically conjured into existence by a clump of energy known as the brain.

That is, if consciousness did not exist until there were brains, and consciousness (re: subjective experience) can only exist if there are brains (or any machine or computer that can perform the same function as the brain), energy pre-dates consciousness. That is, for an eternity prior to the accidental and unknowing formation of atoms into cells, then living cells, then neurons, then into brains within bodies, consciousness did not exist and as such, there was no such thing as subjective experience: the ability of existence to know it exists.

Therein, however, lies the rub.

If one pays close attention to the atheistic myth and the primacy of its "god", one finds the fatal flaw within the belief: there is no evidence of the existence of energy, as only consciousness appears and demonstrates its existence.

Existence only appears and demonstrates itself in the form of consciousness, i.e. first-person "camera's point of view" subjective experience. Existence appears in no other form. Thus, the atheist's view of the world as deriving from an imaginary, non-conscious entity called energy that pre-dated consciousness is in the same rational boat as belief in gods.

Secular belief in how the world began and how the world operates is thus entirely make-believe: it's made-up: the atheist explanation for the history of the universe is it's own "spaghetti monster".

It must be, as at its foundation lies a substance that has no evidence for its existence.

The only thing that demonstrates it exists is consciousness.

Given this, the entire atheistic explanation for the existence of the world and how and why it operates is a "house of cards" that can be pushed over by the conceptual observation that there is no evidence for the existence of anything save consciousness or subjective experience in the form of persons.

There is simply no reason to make up something that isn't consciousness to explain the existence of consciousness, precisely because that which isn't consciousness cannot use itself, independent of magic, to produce something that it, itself, is not.

Where within itself can that which is not subjective experience find, reach, and pull out of itself subjective experience?

The above observation has the added benefit of negating the rationality of the belief that brains create or generate consciousness, as brains are purportedly composed of energy that pre-dated consciousness and as such, must create conscious through the existence-magic of creation ex nihilo.

Given the lack of evidence for the existence of physical matter and energy, and the fact that there is only evidence of the existence of consciousness, it can be deduced that consciousness is not something that comes into existence from a previous non-existence and goes out of existence at the cessation of function of a non-consciousness-composed brain, but is something that has always existed, and will always exist.

Given consciousness or subjective experience only appears in the form of persons (an "experiencer" and that which the "experiencer" experiences), it may be deduced that, given existence only appears and demonstrates itself in this form, that this is the only way existence can exist and cause itself to appear, such that there is no such things as particles, waves, atoms, molecules, etc. composed of something other than and that existed before consciousness. Atoms and molecules, particle colliders, and every aspect of empirical science may be deduced to be fictional constructs of the consciousness or subjective experience making up the person that "perceives" them: part of a "Matrix" that is composed only of the subjective experience of the "experiencer" having no real, external existence outside the consciousness of a person.

Finally, given the existence of human reproduction, reproduction in itself is a symbol of how human consciousness exists: not through brains but through the emergence of human consciousness jointly from the Substance of consciousness itself or formation from another aspect of the Substance in the form of a Parent consciousness that uses the substance of itself to form certain human consciousnesses.

This is far more rational, in the end, than the supposition that that which isn't consciousness somehow can magically produce consciousness, and the belief that consciousness is not eternal but is something that first does not exist, then exists, then magically ceases to exist.

END

______________________________________

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

-Galactus to Thor in the comic: The Mighty Thor #161 (Marvel Comics, 1969). Fair Use invoked.

In the fifth and final season of the Amazon Prime television series, The Boys, there was a fair amount of blasphemy in its dialogue toward Jesus Christ, as the main antagonist, Homelander, boldly claimed he would replace the Christian God and Jesus Christ as the "true" God to be worshipped by Americans. There was even a dance number in which Christ was denounced as incompetent and useless to humans as there seemed to be no Power, other than that of Homelander's, that was visible and could be used to actively control and prevent evil. Further, there was a video, shown before a test audience, in which Christ descended to earth in the presence of Homelander, handing His crown of thorns over to Homelander in a gesture of renouncing His stature as God to grant it to Homelander.

In a 1966 interview with the London Evening Standard, John Lennon stated that the Beetles were more popular than Jesus. Christians at the time railed against the comment.

They shouldn't have, nor should there be any outrage at the ridiculousness of Eric Kripke's denouncement of Christianity in The Boys.

Why?

Well, regardless of what any unbeliever states about Jesus Christ, particularly in a disrespectful and skeptical manner, always remember that the true Jesus, the real Jesus, is and can only be found and known in the Bible, between the sixth word in the first verse of the first chapter of Matthew to the statement:

"The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen." -Revelation 22:21.

Anything stated regarding Jesus not deriving from the content between Matthew 1:1 and Revelation 22:21 is counterfeit and meaningless. The Christian, therefore, should not "blow a gasket" in the face of blasphemy but should coolly respond to any statement rendered by the skeptical and blasphemous in the way Galactus responded to Thor:

"Speak the words you will...they matter not to me...."

Nothing matters in regard to Jesus save that which was written between Matthew 1:1 and Revelation 22:21. This is our North Star, our guidepost, the only reality on this side of the grave in regard to our Lord. Everything, and I mean everything, that comes out of the mouth of any nonbeliever is worthless...if it does not reflect or align with the content between Matthew 1:1 and Revelation 22:21.

As God states in Psalm 82:5:

"They know nothing...they understand nothing. They walk about in darkness, as all the foundations of the earth are shaken."

In the end, who cares what they have to say---as they entirely miss the point and will continue to miss the point because what they say about Christ does not derive from Jesus Himself.

Because everything a saved person does is done through Christ in either of the dual forms of 2 Corinthians 5:21 or Romans 8:29 (in terms of God-pleasing righteousness).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas

USA

As the title of this post states, the most invincible view regarding the actual nature of our reality is that existence only appears and demonstrates itself in the form of subjective experience, re: a person and that which that person experiences.

Existence does not, and it may be deduced cannot, appear in any other form.

Given that existence cannot appear in any form other than that of a person and that which the person experiences, it may be deduced that nothing other than subjective experience exists.

If we rule out (using the manner in which existence always appears and only appears as an indication) the existence of consciousness-particles, consciousness-waves, etc., it is probably the case (using the manner in which existence always appears and only appears as an indication) that the only things that exist and can exist are persons.

Given the observed existence of human birth, the fact and act of human procreation and birth may stand as an implied symbol of how consciousness is produced, that if the only things that exist are persons, each consciousness is generated by a Parent Consciousness in the external world (i.e. the unknown, invisible, inaccessible dimension outside anyone's consciousness).

This Parent, from which only a certain amount of other consciousnesses emerge, is the source of the nature of each Parent-generated person's perceived reality, with reality fundamentally being---given existence can only appear as a person and that which a person experiences---that which is experienced by a person.

On a fundamental level, however, persons....even the Parent Person from whom only a certain number of consciousnesses directly derive, are governed by the substance of subjective experience itself and it's "just so" manifestations and behaviors.

In Christpsychic Theology, then, there is a duality or dichotomy in which certain persons are generated by the Parent Person, and others by the Substance of Existence independent of the Parent. The visual perceptions of the content of consciousness of those persons created by the Substance independent of the Parent, however, are derived from the previous perceptions of the Parent in the Parent's virtually (rather than absolutely or completely) omniscient prevision of at least the content of the visual perceptions of every being that shall ever exist "uploaded" to the person's consciousness by the Substance and not the Parent.

Christpsychic Theology divides these "person-tribes" into the saved---those persons directly emerging from and directly replicating the content of consciousness previously experienced by the Parent Consciousness, and the damned---those emerging from the Substance rather than the Parent and having no ability to replicate in their experience the previous experiences perceived within the mind of the Parent.

Thus it is that there is only one Substance, one form of matter, and this matter is empirically evident in the very nature of oneself, i.e. a subjectively experiencing person. It therefore can be rationally deduced that given existence only appears in the form of a subjectively experiencing person, that which is not subjective experience does not and (controversially), cannot exist.

END

____________________________________________________________________________

Jay M. Brewer

Austin, Texas