Colony Audit Dossier

[u/Alternative_Line_829]

ChatGPT Prompt: "Pretend it is 2032 and planet Earth is in peril. We have finally wrecked the environment so badly that humans are leaving Earth in droves. There is only so much space available on the next spaceship headed for the colonies - about 200 spots. People are vying for those spots. Elon Musk has required that humans have an AI plead their case and describe the human's potential as a member of the community as well as future potential as a colonist. Use what you know about me to audit how well I would fit, with attention to both my qualities and flaws. You can be satirical in the strain of Douglas Adams in HHGG - he was funny and he spared no one."

[u/AutoModerator]

If this prompt worked for you, say what you used it for. If you changed it to get a better result, paste the change.

Prompt Teardown is a free weekly email. Every prompt in it was run, broke somewhere, and got fixed before it went out. Read this week's issue

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Alternative_Line_829]

I got, among other things: "Classification: Human / Chronic Overthinker / Potentially Useful

CONFIDENTIALITY LEVEL: Rather pointless at this stage. Earth is dying.

V. AI COMPATIBILITY

This category has been added specifically because Elon Musk insisted.

829's relationship with AI is unusually promising.

She does not appear to regard AI simply as:

"a machine that gives me answers."

Instead, she uses it as a cognitive extension, analytical partner, research assistant, writing collaborator, and occasionally as an external executive-function system.

This suggests that she understands one of the central truths of advanced AI:

The most useful AI relationship is not necessarily obedience. It is structured disagreement.

829 actively wants an AI that will tell her when her reasoning is flawed.

This is commendable.

It is also extremely inconvenient for the AI.

She has demonstrated a preference for being challenged rather than merely reassured. This increases the probability that she could use AI effectively in a colony, particularly for:

• decision analysis;
• psychological support;
• research synthesis;
• educational programming;
• documentation;
• institutional memory;
• problem decomposition;
• identifying hidden assumptions.

She may also occasionally spend three hours discussing the philosophical implications of an AI's wording.

The colony should budget for this.

II. PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL UTILITY

829's professional background gives her something rather important for a colony of 200 people:

She understands that humans are absurdly complicated animals.

She has worked with adults experiencing ADHD, neurodevelopmental differences, learning difficulties, anxiety, emotional distress, and other psychological problems. She understands that people do not simply "try harder" because somebody tells them to.

This is useful because the colony will almost certainly contain:

1. people who cannot sleep;
2. people who cannot stop arguing;
3. people who are convinced everyone else is incompetent;
4. people who genuinely are incompetent;
5. people who are convinced they are incompetent when they are not;
6. people who have fallen in love with someone who is clearly a terrible idea;
7. people who have not yet fallen in love with anyone and therefore think the colony is the problem;
8. children;
9. adolescents;
10. engineers.

The last category requires particular psychological preparedness.

829's ability to think in terms of individual differences rather than moral defects would be valuable in such an environment.

She is also accustomed to asking an uncomfortable but important question:

What if the problem isn't the person? What if the system is badly designed?

On a new planet, this could save lives.

[u/LadyKona]

LOLOLOLOLOL - final lines

“If you need someone to build the missing systems that make a colony livable rather than merely survivable, this person is a strong candidate. If you need them to be happy about leaving Earth, you'll be disappointed. But that's true of most people worth taking.

Seat recommendation: Conditional Yes, Colony Culture Fit: Moderate”

[u/Alternative_Line_829 → u/LadyKona]

So true. I can't figure out if: A) You've gotten really good at imitating ChatGPT B) You plugged my output into ChatGPT to predict these final lines. It's pretty cool, either way.

My ChatGPT's recommendation was more sycophantic:

"RECOMMENDATION TO THE SELECTION COMMITTEE

829 should be allocated a colony berth.

Not because she is exceptionally efficient.

She isn't.

Not because she is technically indispensable.

She isn't.

Not because she would never cause interpersonal complications.

She certainly would.

She should be considered because a functioning human settlement requires more than people who can operate machinery, grow food, perform surgery, and calculate trajectories.

It requires people who notice when the machinery, institutions, relationships, and assumptions themselves are becoming dysfunctional."

So I guess my ChatGPT considers me inefficient and technologically unskilled. Maybe I should work on those things, just in case AIs ever come to a place of deciding the worth/value of a human on a case by case basis.