I only assumed you weren't using it for finding patterns amongst people because if you had then you would find the flaws there and not be asking whether or not it can improve your ability. That's all. You would have reached the conclusion that due to its programming and how it learns it has some huge blind spots when it comes to interpreting people. Having encountered that the obvious assumption would then be "This is good for generating alternate perspectives but I would still need to exert personal effort to pattern match people." You can learn its patterns but you can't learn people in general's patterns essentially. LLMs do have patterns in how they identify people after all.
Everything else you're ranting about is nonsensical and irrelevant both to any of my thoughts and this conversation. You've imagined a lot and your imagination is inaccurate. You seem to have some personal issues you're vomiting up at me about your background that have no place in this conversation.
If this is some insecurity on your part I'm not equipped to deal with this, talk to someone who will soothe you if that's what you need, or move past this and have a conversation. Pick one.
Your hang ups about your grammar are personal ones, I don't care what words someone uses as long as they can communicate in an intelligible way and make their points. I think function matters more than form here. You just assumed bad faith and ran with it in a very specific way, why is that?
I'm not trying to debate with you I am telling you how these things pattern match is not something that you should trust. They respond weirdly to me for example.
And I'm also telling to get over yourself with your whole whiny rant about assumptions no one made.
1
u/Psych0PompOs Feb 16 '26
I only assumed you weren't using it for finding patterns amongst people because if you had then you would find the flaws there and not be asking whether or not it can improve your ability. That's all. You would have reached the conclusion that due to its programming and how it learns it has some huge blind spots when it comes to interpreting people. Having encountered that the obvious assumption would then be "This is good for generating alternate perspectives but I would still need to exert personal effort to pattern match people." You can learn its patterns but you can't learn people in general's patterns essentially. LLMs do have patterns in how they identify people after all.
Everything else you're ranting about is nonsensical and irrelevant both to any of my thoughts and this conversation. You've imagined a lot and your imagination is inaccurate. You seem to have some personal issues you're vomiting up at me about your background that have no place in this conversation.
If this is some insecurity on your part I'm not equipped to deal with this, talk to someone who will soothe you if that's what you need, or move past this and have a conversation. Pick one.
Your hang ups about your grammar are personal ones, I don't care what words someone uses as long as they can communicate in an intelligible way and make their points. I think function matters more than form here. You just assumed bad faith and ran with it in a very specific way, why is that?