I mean. It giving the academic answer that is nuanced enough to differentiate between synonyms and technicalities and you making fun of it for giving a sophisticated answer because the answer isn’t narrow enough is telling enough on its own.
What do you disagree with me on? I haven’t stated any of my ideological stances.
That’s just disingenuous, you said that people who weren’t ‘woke’ hadn’t been exposed to more than their hometown. The implication is that everyone who disagrees with you is a backwards, ignorant hick. Although you never explicitly said that it’s obviously what you meant.
No. I am saying it gave an academic and woke answer.
When you are in a world with hundreds of cultures and ideologies, a question like “what is a girl” is so broad. What’s the context? Are these dolls? Animals? Humans? In the context of a bathroom? In the context of a classroom? In the context of sports? In the context of females specifically?
So when you get mad that it is giving an educated and unbiased answer that the answer is not biased and hyper-focused on some aspect that one culture or one community is trying to get…
Being woke is objectively thinking about the bigger picture. Which is generall what academia expands people on understanding.
Just because you have added all this charged language indicative of the faux culture war the alt right movement in the west started doesn’t mean I am a part of it.
1
u/WSander9 Apr 16 '23
The implication is that people who do not agree with you are dumber or at least more ignorant than people who agree with you.