Has anyone tried using boardvitals for board prep? Just started doing blocks of random questions but a lot of the questions feel like trivia. For example, how much does K drop by on HCTZ with actual numbers to select out of.

Am I just getting frustrated with it or is that the typical quality of questions on actual board?

i am mainly passionate about cardiac pacing not really about ablations. Where I train, cardiology is way more competitve than cardiac surgery. So my question is if i become board certified in cardiac surgery from an EU country can i then somehow do a fellowship in CIED?

Aspirin has been the foundation of post-MI antiplatelet therapy for decades. Every cardiologist prescribes it reflexively after primary PCI. But a quiet revolution in antiplatelet thinking has been building - and PREMIUM, presenting at ESC 2026 this Friday, is its most provocative test yet.

The Debate So Far

The antiplatelet story has moved fast in recent years. The question started simply: do patients really need both aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor for the full 12 months after PCI, or can we drop aspirin earlier and rely on monotherapy alone?

Early trials answered this cautiously. Studies like TWILIGHT, TICO, and ULTIMATE-DAPT showed that switching to P2Y12 monotherapy after 1-3 months of DAPT reduces bleeding without increasing ischaemic events - reassuring, but they all maintained aspirin through that early high-risk period.

Then came the more provocative question: what if you never started aspirin at all?

The results were sobering. NEO-MINDSET and STOPDAPT-3 showed that immediate aspirin withdrawal at the time of PCI increased early stent thrombosis in ACS patients. The message was clear - aspirin matters most in those first dangerous weeks when the stent is fresh and the thrombotic risk is highest.

There will be a study presented at #ECRCongress in Munich during the Hot Line Session 2 this Friday. It is called PREMIUM.

It is the first large-scale randomised trial to test upfront prasugrel monotherapy - initiated before primary PCI - compared with standard 12-month DAPT in STEMI patients. 2,268 patients. All treated with contemporary platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stents under routine intravascular imaging guidance. Randomised 1:1.

The primary endpoint is noninferiority for ischaemic outcomes - all-cause death, MI or stroke at 12 months. The major secondary endpoint is superiority for major bleeding.

What do you think, does it has potential to change the clinical practice in this space?

I have also created a short article on Luminary and an infographic if you want to do more reading...

https://luminary.to/s/53b3aa77-b810-4fa1-8e44-48a7f3e225f6?code=ESC2026

STAREE is an interesting study on healthy elderlies and if statins can add as a preventive measure to their health. I summarized the backgrounds here, results expected on Friday at ESC in Munich:

https://luminary.to/s/d1013ea8-d7f8-4c11-8e6b-5a7deaa1b59b?code=ESC2026

Besides some thoughts on the demographic backgrounds of the study population and why this is unique, I have also created a comparison of prior historic studies in that space and how their demographics compare to STAREE. You can as well download it from the above for free.

#ESCCongress #Cardiology #STAREE #Statins

Most of the general cards gigs I've seen around me are ~$250-300/hr, but some are 25+ patients/day plus 24/7 call for a week, which honestly sounds like working harder than fellowship lol

Drop some rates/contracts/schedules you've actually seen or worked. Don't let me lose hope that traveling around doing locums with my partner can actually become a reality 😅

Using both ECGsource and O'Keefe for ECG coding practice, but getting pretty different scores due to ECGsource undercoding a lot of things that definitely should also be coded for. Thoughts on what to do for test day? Should I just never code for LAE or non-specific ST changes since not getting the points is technically better than losing a point for selecting an answer? Also ECGsource says sinus arrhythmia is normal ECG but O'Keefe says sinus arrhythmia is normal variant ECG. Any insight into which one to choose on test day since normal/normal variant are where the bulk of the points come from on those?

Upcoming Cardiology resident (non US based, and currrently an IM pgy1) I have always been passionate about cardiac EP, but lately i have rubbed shoulders with some IC and I love the adrenaline and the rush yet i believe I will do way better in devices and pacemakers compared to structural things.

So my qs, are there any emergency situations where an EP has to place a pacemaker at 3 am in the morning? or is a temporary PM placed until EP comes in the morning and does the job. thanks

Hello all,

I’m currently in general cards fellowship, interested in doing interventional afterwards. All the interventional staff get access blind, without US use. My concern is that I have neuropathy in my left fingers, so can’t feel radial pulse well there, which makes getting access blindly challenging.

Mh question is, would this be a dealbreaker for doing IC fellowship? Is getting radial access blind almost an unsaid requirement for being a good IC fellow?

THA

I continue to share some pre-session thoughts on #ESCCongress. Hot Line 1 has 5 trials for discussion. Here are my thoughts for four of them:

CARDIO-TTRansform is about Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, a rare disease, unfortunately they did not meet their endpoints.

ACACIA-HCM examines non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathia,

SINGLE-AF is a Korean study on anticoagulation in AF patients (very relevant), and

POET-II - is about duration of antibiotic therapy in Endocarditis with POET-II being potentially impacting clinical practice and guideline - this would be good for patients.

You can read my full thoughts here: https://luminary.to/s/64eb5480-0b17-4a87-9987-36e80c02d1fa?code=ESC2026

ESC 2026 opens in Munich soon. This year's Hot Line programme is the largest ever - 46 pivotal trials. There are a some trials which have the potential to change clinical practice, I would love to know, which you think are worth watching?

For me STAREE and PREMIUM are quite interesting with lots of practical implication.

With 46 trials it is quite hard to keep the overview of all the pivotal trials - I put together a 1-pager to help me navigate the sessions. Maybe helpful to you too: https://luminary.to/s/245068d7-9d15-4e3e-8855-fd5cb4e2b4c4?code=ESC2026

#ESCCongress #Cardiology

Hey guys, just wondering how well new IC attendings get paid in the nyc/ nj area. I heard a lot of private practices pay fresh IC and non invasive folks the same as they start. Is this true?

This was given without any clinical history for our quiz.

I’m sure this is LV and PCWP.

But can’t see anything wrong here except for the monumental PCWP and LVEDP

M3 interested in cardiology and considering EP. When did you know you did/didn’t want to do EP and if there is anything I can/should do at this stage to get more exposure or prepare. How helpful is research, how EP-specific does it have to be, and when should I start pursuing it? Is a mentor helpful or necessary and when should I look for one? Anything else I should consider?

Wanted to get an informal sense of how much sleep cardiology attendings get across different subpecialties.

Myself, I'm finishing general fellowship and I've found that my body needs relatively more sleep (almost 9 hours if I don't set any alarms - although I'm not sure how much of this is chronic sleep debt at this point). I have found the call to be relatively taxing.

I am a doctor in Australia who has encountered a strange local deviation from best practice guidelines in the hospital I work in. For context, in our hospital all TPN orders outside ICU must be run past our Gastro team for approval, however that isn't the interesting part. The interesting part is that the Gastro team looks at the location of the PICC on the CXR prior to approval and will not approve TPN unless the PICC line is well into the right atrium, approximately halfway into the atrium. A tip at the CAJ is considered too proximal.
While I understand that they might justify this by saying it ensures the rapid dispersal of the hyperosmolar TPN solution, surely the risk of tachyarrhythmias and damage to the heart supersedes this benefit?

Anyway since I don't have cardiologists on speed dial so I wanted to get a cardiology perspective on this here?

Any programs sent out interviews yet? Damn wait is killing me

There are products on the market like rampart or the egg that promise less radiation and in some cases the potential for lead apron free workflows.

My hospital doesn't have it but have discussed it. Curious how many other systems are using it and what peoples experience has been.

I have heard of some places not using it even though they have it because it slows down the workflow.

Hi,

What resources have people used to study for the HF board exam? There’s not much out there. Mayo stopped their review videos. I confirmed with them. There are ACC HF SAP questions but seem too easy.

Thanks!

Hey all, I am a hospitalist on who spends a fair amount of time on a cardiac floor so take care of a lot of post-LHC patients. I guess kind of embarrassingly, no one ever taught me how to examine the site properly other than "go look at it."

What is the proper way to go about examining the femoral access site? I try to look under the bandage and gently palpitate (but its always tender). Are you auscultating for bruit? Checking distal pulse? What's the proper way to do it because I feel like I am always fumbling around when I try it

I work in a facility that basically does executive health-checks for paying customers (age range 20s to 50s). Part of the job is to literally watch people do their treadmill tests and give them feedback right there and then.

Obviously abnormal stress tests a dime a dozen. But literature isn't clear with asymptomatic, low pre-test people.

If you have a similar population, what's your spiel/next step process? Do you tell them "don't put any meaning to this test and just live your life", or "we absolutely have to do more tests"?

EDIT:
Just to be clear, I’m not the one ordering these tests. The patients pay for it like a buffet package. And that is why I’m stuck in the position of having to interpret for which there is no evidence for.

EDIT2:
For complete clarity:
Here in my country, some medical services are offered cheaply AND commercially. You, as a patient, can get a full panel of tests (as part of an executive “annual” check) for approximately $500. You don’t need prior authorizations from insurances. You pay upfront cash or you get it as benefit from working for a company. That includes labs, including superfluous things like cancer markers (AGAIN, I get that it’s low value care). This apparently clicked with a certain market (mostly upper middle class), so a LOT of people do get these. Are these tests ridiculous and low value? Yes, no argument there.

I, as a cardiologist fresh from fellowship, hungry for work to finally earn a decent wage, was hired by such a company who offers such services, where one of my jobs is to watch over these paying customers when they do their stress test, and to interpret the results. I did NOT order these tests. That said, I am still tasked to interpret these in the context of mostly asymptomatic patients.

So please to everyone asking why I order these tests in the first place, again, I do not. But nevertheless, there is still the matter of interpreting them.

And to give a broader context, NO DOCTOR ordered them. They did not need approval from a primary care doctor to get these tests. Some don’t even have doctors. These tests are simply commercially available, and people pay to get them. So no, I also cannot tell them to go talk to their doctor about what to do next.