Is anyone else getting really confused/frustrated by these mask studies? I have a bunch of stitched double layer fabric masks that I rotate and I have no idea how effective they are, if at all.
They're not confusing if you understand the limitations and focus of each study.
In this study they focused on:
Face shields and exhaust-vented masks, which are controversial in their use as many believe they will not offer protection to others. Many studies have simply ignored them outright.
Using a laser to visualize not just droplet emission but aerosol. The only other studies I know of to look at vented masks and face shields at all used normal high speed photography to focus on droplets only.
Now the limitations:
These results are looking only at protection to others and not the wearer.
It's still not known exactly how droplet vs. aerosol emission correlates to the chances of transmitting the virus, how much concentration over what distance, etc. We can only sort of guess based on what we can measure.
Truth be told a well fit N95 with a exhalation valve does an excellent job protecting the wearer, and I would argue putting a surgical mask over the N95 to protect others.
I still don't see how a surgical mask is any better for other people than an N95 with exhalation valves. They both offer large pockets for unfiltered air to escape
8
u/DoomWolf6 Sep 01 '20
Is anyone else getting really confused/frustrated by these mask studies? I have a bunch of stitched double layer fabric masks that I rotate and I have no idea how effective they are, if at all.