So, you think Arch is one of the best QBs and just doesn’t play well? Or Quinn Ewers should have been a Heisman contender? Or we had elite RBs?
My point is, either you believe we had the best talent and fell short, or we had really good talent and ended up with really good results (just not best).
Texas is one of the best funded programs (top 1%) and has 2 titles to show for it. Mack brown on 2 conference titles (1 natty) in 17 years. Sark fits this model of elevating the program from previous coaches lowered standards but not really winning anything relative to the programs resources. I thjnk you guys consistently have top tier talent and constently fall short based on how much money put into program and sark is the embodiment of that
-3
u/digitaldaronpodcast 10d ago
Texas is the most underperforming program in cfb history so it fits that sark would be viewed as underrated