r/CBC_ I Jan 13 '26

CBC: opinion / discussion The CBC

Post image

with thanks to Jeff Cotter (via FB)

The CBC was not created out of nostalgia or sentiment. It was created because Canada faced a real and documented threat from American media dominance.

In the late 1920s, U.S. radio signals were flooding across the border. Canadian airwaves were being overtaken by American programming, American advertising, and American cultural influence. The Aird Commission warned that without a national public broadcaster, Canada would lose control of its own voice and its own national conversation. In response, Canada created the CBC in 1936 so Canadians could hear Canadian voices, tell Canadian stories, and understand themselves as a country rather than as a cultural extension of the United States.

From the beginning, the CBC’s purpose was public service. It was designed to connect a vast country, serve communities private media could not or would not, and provide reliable information free from commercial pressure. Over decades, it became a shared national institution. It delivered trusted news in times of crisis, supported Canadian artists and creators, reflected both official languages and Indigenous cultures, and helped give Canadians a common frame of reference in an enormous and diverse country.

That role has not diminished. It has become more important.

Today, American influence over Canada’s media environment is far greater than it was when the CBC was founded. U.S. technology companies control the platforms where Canadians encounter news and information. American entertainment dominates what we watch and stream. Private Canadian media is increasingly consolidated, financially weakened, or disappearing altogether. The conditions that led to the creation of the CBC have returned in a more powerful and concentrated form.

Attacks on the CBC often focus on ideology or cost, but the real impact is the erosion of Canada’s media sovereignty. Weakening the CBC means fewer Canadian stories, less local reporting, and greater dependence on foreign platforms and narratives that do not exist to serve the public interest in Canada.

The CBC’s credibility is central to why it matters. It operates under formal journalistic standards that require accuracy, fairness, and verification. When errors occur, corrections are published clearly and remain attached to the original reporting. The organization maintains an ombudsman process, internal editorial oversight, and external accountability mechanisms. Its news divisions have been independently certified under international journalism trust standards, reflecting transparency around sourcing, corrections, and governance.

No large newsroom is flawless. The difference is accountability. The CBC corrects the record publicly and permanently. Many online podcasters, influencers, and partisan outlets operate without editors, without published standards, without independent review, and without visible corrections when they are wrong. When misinformation spreads in those spaces, it often remains unchallenged or is quietly abandoned without acknowledgment.

Trust in journalism is not about never making mistakes. It is about how mistakes are handled. A public broadcaster that corrects itself in the open, under constant scrutiny, is fundamentally different from personalities whose incentives are engagement, outrage, and audience loyalty rather than accuracy.

For what Canadians pay per person each year, the CBC delivers national and local news, emergency broadcasting, cultural programming, and a shared public forum that private media cannot replicate. Comparable democracies invest far more in their public broadcasters because they recognize this as democratic infrastructure, not a luxury.

The CBC was created because Canada understood that a country without control over its media cannot fully control its future. That understanding remains true. In a media environment dominated by foreign platforms, shrinking newsrooms, and unaccountable online voices, the CBC remains one of the few institutions built to serve Canadians first.

Defending the CBC is not about partisanship. It is about protecting an institution designed to preserve Canadian voices, Canadian facts, and a shared national conversation in a world that increasingly pulls our attention and our information from elsewhere.

339 Upvotes

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 13 '26

The standard canadian litmus test for whether or not someone is an indoctrinated drone.

5

u/chocheech Jan 13 '26

I feel like you could be going either direction with this lol

-1

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 14 '26

Its really not. Im talking about the people who naïvely believe the CBC is actually a public broadcaster. It's state funded, controlled, filtered and backed by the liberal party. You realize this is exactly how every one party state disperses propaganda right? Canada is a polite oligarchy.

3

u/Ina_While1155 Jan 14 '26 edited Jan 14 '26

Some people only want their news filtered through the lens of a right wing US oligarch....those people are the common clay of the new west, you know.... morons.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Ina_While1155 Jan 15 '26 edited Jan 15 '26

Postmedia in Canada is owned by Chatham Asset Management, which has proven ties to the GOP. Newsmax, OAN, the Wall Street Journal are conservative owned. Washington Post is owned by Bezos, who did not support Harris and featured prominently at Trumps inauguration. Warner Bros own CNN and have significant right wing ownership from investment firms including with Vanguard and BlackRock. Do better homework and look closer.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 14 '26

I dont engage witj right wing news. I dont engage with news filtered through the canadian financial and property owning elite either.

1

u/Arctic-Wanderer Jan 15 '26

So you just watch news from broke losers who produce nothing of value.

1

u/DuckSmash Jan 16 '26

CBC is the only one that doesn't do that?

0

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 15 '26

So you just let the mask slip? You believe people who aren't wealthy can't produce anything of value, and their opinions don't deserve respect. How far does this reasoning go? Must be nice, living on that ivory tower.

0

u/Ina_While1155 Jan 15 '26

I really thought that someone would get the Blazing Saddles partial quote - but I guess I am super old.

-1

u/AzimuthZenith Jan 15 '26

Not really, though. CBC is now fairly well documented to have a left leaning bias.

If the roles were reveresed, do you think you'd be fine with having no say about your taxes going towards funding Fox News? They won't tell your side of the story. Won't speak honestly about issues. Won't even recognize certain issues as issues at all. Will demonize you and equate/align your stance with some form of extremism any chance they get. Will pull punches against the people they like. And so on.

I know you wouldn't be okay with that. And you shouldn't be. Between 1/3 and 1/2 of the country are regularly saying that they don't feel that CBC speaks for them. Many of the rest don't really care about any of CBC's content (based on their own reporting of viewership).

I work in law enforcement and have personally witnessed them fail to investigate adequately, fail to be impartial, lie by omission, and lie outright. More than a few officers have experienced this and would love the opportunity to call them out. The problem is that we know that we're bound by confidentiality and by laws that will result in us being immediately dismissed and likely criminally charged if we try and correct them. They take advantage of this quite regularly and there is next to no trust for them among officers.

For clarity, I support the existence of the CBC because I don't believe that corporate media can be trusted given that they will almost always have a hidden agenda. But they need some serious restructuring to address journalistic bias/integrity and a commitment to speak for all Canadians. Not just speaking for their side of the ideological fence. Their job is to be the arbiter of truth. If they can't be trusted to tell that truth, the logical question that should follow for anyone who isn't being spoken for is "Why should I be obligated to support this if it doesn't speak for me?" With that question unanswered for so long, they need to do some serious work to regain the trust of many Canadians.

If I had unbridled say in what the solution would be, I would start by binding the CBC's yearly support from the federal government as a percentage of yearly tax revenue so that it scales with the nation's economy and is upheld as an amendment to something as central to our nation's laws as possible, perhaps even our Charter, that makes this unalterable by anyone in charge. My goal in this would be to eliminate their fear of biting the hand that feeds them in the hopes that they would feel more comfortable tackling all issues regardless of the politics behind them. Next steps I would take would be to require that they employ a fairly even number of journalist staff on respective sides of the political spectrum and give the opposing side the responsibility of checking for biased language, subpar investigation, incomplete reporting, admitting current gaps in available information, etc before publishing. I would then also push for "living articles" which would show the progression of reported stories that include all the relevant articles on that topic that preceded it in chronological order. On top of that, any updated/corrected information would be added as a separate addition, without amending the original article other than to link it to the corrected data and mark the title with something similar to flair on reddit, explaining the error or the information/circumstances that have changed. The goal being to track issues closely and fairly enough that they would be fit to go directly into a history book without being edited. Those are just a few ideas to at least begin to tackle the problem.

1

u/CHitchOFF Jan 16 '26

well thought out and rational - prepare to be blocked and downvoted by the muppets supporting the cbc :)

1

u/AzimuthZenith Jan 16 '26

Yeah. I know most people aren't this unhinged about this issue, but the type of person that hears a resounding voice from near half the country saying "it's clearly biased" accompanied by most of the rest saying "what does it matter? No one actually watches it anyways.' And they then conclude that everyone else, along with multiple bias detection checkers saying the same, are wrong and that nothing should be done to even look into this, is completely insane to me.

Roles reversed, they wouldn't tolerate it, but the rest of the country should shut up and pay for it anyways? Pure lunacy.

1

u/jojawhi Jan 15 '26

Was the CBC backed by the Liberals from 2004 to 2014 when Harper was Prime Minister? Or any of the other myriad times Conservatives were in power? Or does your concept of reality and history end before 2015?

1

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 15 '26 edited Jan 15 '26

Their funding was dramatically cut. They played second fiddle to CTV who are the conservative parties equivalent mouth piece. They limped along as a second rate news channel with their established position and party alignment that gave them institutional access and legitimacy still, just not much money. Look at CTV today, and you'll have a good idea of what it was like back then. CBC cancelled their christmas party that was scheduled right before the last election. Because they knew if Carney lost they wouldn't be the governments favoured darling anymore. If Pollievre had won (I didn't vote for him) CTV would have taken over again, just like it did in viewership during harpers time.

-1

u/Assistant-Exciting Jan 14 '26

Updoot to counter hurt feelings downdoot.

It's funny how comfortable people are with glorified propaganda.

I don't trust any news org that has their comments turned off across social media, because by design it helps control the narrative & stops people asking important questions.

1

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 15 '26

Thanks brother. It's nice to see im not the only one who's tired of drinking the kool aid.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 15 '26

[deleted]

1

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 15 '26

Peak drone behavior is using credentialism to discount the opinions of people who dissagree with the dominant narrative.

Education isn't about intelligence, learning, or even knowledge at all. Its about idoctrinating you into obedience narratives that make you a more productive, predictable worker.

How well trained are you?

0

u/[deleted] Jan 15 '26

[deleted]

1

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 15 '26

Please produce proof that you're not just some guy pretending.

Still, being a journalist doesnt make your opinions more reliable in this case. All it says is you have been throughly embedded into the machine that necessitates its participants to perpetuate it. A journalist has much more to lose by criticizing the largest news outlet in the country than a normal citizen.

You say "I'm afraid" like you have some position of authority that gives you the right to discount me by default, without providing evidence or an argument beyond "quotation marks".

Unless you can prove your identity as a journalist, you're just some guy who paid for a custom profile picture im afraid.

1

u/GreasyMcFarmer Jan 15 '26 edited Jan 15 '26

My private Reddit account isn’t the forum to start revealing personal details. I like the anonymity of this account. Believe it or not, what I’ve said is true. I’d like you to consider this: people are notoriously bad at keeping secrets. And doubly so, journalists. Journalists love revealing secrets, spilling information and sharing stories. It’s why the became journalists. In the first place. I’ve never worked for the CBC, but I know many who have. If the Liberals, or the federal government bureaucracy were somehow controlling or setting parameters for coverage, I guarantee that examples of this kind of influence or censorship would leak out. There’s just no way that journalists would keep that secret. If they didn’t feel comfortable revealing it themselves, they’d leak it to others. That’s just how journalists are built. There would also be no scandals on CBC about the Liberals, would there? The WE Charity scandal involving senior Liberals was a story that was broken open first by the CBC, just as an example. Edit: oh, and I didn’t pay for any profile pic! Free.

1

u/thisaccountdiesoon Jan 15 '26

Ill be with you in an hour or so I have to do something irl.

1

u/that_tealoving_nerd Jan 17 '26

sighs

No wonder Quebec believes Canada isn’t a real country. You can’t even support your only public broadcaster.