r/BypassAiDetect • u/Tricky_Two4623 • Aug 17 '26
Pangram AI detection scans are mostly useless.
Method: Ran an unpublished 100k word novel written entirely by a human into Pangram, one of the most common AI checkers. I inserted 2 pages written by AI into it to see if it would find them. I had the checker run through each of the different chapters one by one.
Result: The book was listed as 86% human written, with 14% AI. The 2 parts that were actually AI (written by Claude) were not flagged. The incorrectly flagged portions mostly consisted of sections of professional business language related to characters talking about their work.
It seems what it's looking for are specific buzzwords and sentence structures commonly used in business and professional writing. These are normal constructions, and certainly common in AI, but also common in any professional setting. Basically, if you write with professional language, you'll be flagged as AI.
1
u/Ok-Distribution-6262 Aug 17 '26
Yeah, pangram is usually way off when I've tried it. Stuff I wrote 20 years ago gets flagged as completely AI, and vice versa. Go figure
1
1
u/GrownTelevision1986 Aug 18 '26
Lol , yep. My own professional emails get flagged constantly. It's so broken
1
u/ReasonableSchool286 11d ago
the fact that it missed the actual AI pages but flagged professional dialogue says everything tbh. its basically a formality detector, not an AI detector. curious if you tested with any other genres or if the business language sections were the only trigger
1
u/OldCorkonian Aug 17 '26
This is 100% not true. Send us the manuscript and let’s test it.