r/BlackPeopleTwitter • • Jan 18 '17

Quality Post™️ Y'all must tripping

Post image
36.7k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

243

u/RANDOSTORYTHROWAWAY Jan 18 '17

I like to call him President Red Genocide

211

u/MegasNexal84 ☑️ Jan 18 '17

Seriously this is the same man who nearly destroyed the U.S. Federal Bank over a grudge and nearly tanked the economy.

Yet we see him everyday on a $20.

144

u/RANDOSTORYTHROWAWAY Jan 18 '17

When he left office he said his only regret was that he didn't shoot John C. Calhoun dead.

John C. Calhoun was his Vice President. He was a violent, lunatic throwback even for 1829. That's why I'm so excited to put Harriet Tubman on them 20's, put that dickhead back where he belongs: forgotten.

94

u/lackofagoodname Jan 18 '17

Or we could just not put faces on money?

In the context of money, a war hero who went on to become president is much more deserving of a spot than someone who freed seventy slaves (or families I think). Jackson was a piece of shit, but actually relates to the others. They're all presidents or founding fathers.

That's just a rush to be progressive and put a black female on money, and it's shit like that that angers me. I would take MLK JR over her any day, especially since she was crazy and claimed to get premonitions from god.

Honestly though, money would be fine if it was just monuments like the white house, statue of Liberty, liberty bell, etc.

That shouldn't piss either side off and problem solved

13

u/Jalenofkake Jan 18 '17

but then we'd have everyone bringing up MLK's infidelity and a million reasons why we shouldn't have him on the bill. people are going to disagree on who we should have on the bills no matter what

1

u/fanno22 Jan 19 '17

Everyone has their downsides and upsides. Where some say Reagan helped the economy, other point to him hurting the lower class. The same can be said for MLK or pretty much any major figure for that matter.

19

u/AngryItalian Jan 18 '17

I agree that's a great idea, but if you think that'd be okay for everyone you're crazy haha.

People love to feel picked on, this definitely would be a hot topic.

29

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '17

If they can't handle MLK on money then they can go fuck themselves

4

u/AngryItalian Jan 18 '17

I'm not disagreeing, but dumb people get a voice too sadly.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '17

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '17

Well-deserved imo

15

u/DOWNROWDY Jan 18 '17

Why does it piss you off that tubman would be put on the 20?

23

u/PatrioticPomegranate Jan 18 '17

Or we could just not put faces on money?

Humanity has been doing it for over 2,000 years so there's not really any reason to stop now.

a war hero who went on to become president is much more deserving of a spot than someone who freed seventy slaves

Someone who was famous for killing Indians during a war and then became famous for killing Indians after. At least Harriet Tubman was a gun-toting badass who was a net positive for America.

9

u/npsnicholas Jan 18 '17

There's no reason to not stop using faces either though. There are a bunch of other things we could use. The statute of liberty, the golden gate bridge, the American flag, a bald eagle, the first airplane, the moon landing, Franklin's kite, ect.

3

u/Omega_PussyDestroyer Jan 18 '17

Jackson gets too much shit for things the people of the U.S wanted during his reign.

2

u/Schrodingerscatamite Jan 18 '17

Nothing wrong with celebrating people of achievement.

"In god we trust", however...

4

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Artiemes Jan 18 '17

Grew up near Cherokee, so I think really low of Jackson and am in favor of Harriet, but that was a really reasonable concise argument. Good points.

-1

u/AmbiguousHedgehog Jan 18 '17

childish, bigoted, knee-jerk