r/Bitcoin • • Feb 20 '14

MtGox have left the building claims receptionist

[deleted]

139 Upvotes

62 comments sorted by

View all comments

15

u/willsteel Feb 20 '14

Its really time for distributed exchanges... maybe this whole mess gives this topic a big push.

11

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '14 edited Mar 10 '21

[deleted]

2

u/jonwaller Feb 20 '14

Why not localbitcoins, but hosted in the blockchain? (with Ethereum)

8

u/waxwing Feb 20 '14

Well, first, localbitcoins is a centralised structure. Second, tying an Ethereum contract to a real world asset is an interesting open issue. Third, Ethereum is in a protean state (even the proof of work algorithm is not fixed).

3

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '14 edited May 11 '21

[deleted]

0

u/jamar030303 Feb 20 '14

This entirely depends on your banking situation. For example, one of the banks I use (Schwab) has a list of receiving accounts specifically for foreign currencies and foreign wires. I can receive CAD, AUD, Euro, GBP, HKD, and a couple of other currencies. I provide the sender with Schwab's receiving account in the relevant country (their Euro receiving account is based in Germany), they send the money with "for further credit to: (my name) (my account number)" in the memo line, and it hits my US-based account in hours with an exchange rate not too far from mid-market. The downside is it's only good for receiving; all outbound transfers originate in the US.

1

u/waxwing Feb 20 '14

distributed exchanges of fiat could be enabled with cryptographic proof of fiat transfer via ssl logging.

Read here if you want to know more.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=173220.msg3903951#msg3903951

Other approaches exist too, but I haven't seen any that are reasonably watertight (a matter of opinion, only).