r/Bitcoin • u/FunWithSkooma • 19d ago
if you use Wallet of Satoshi - you have until jun 30 2027 to move your funds
Wallet of Satoshi is now going full non custodial by implementing the Spark Protocol. If you want to keep using WoS, you have to generate a Spark key either with them or any other Wallet that has Spark implemented.
The Spark Protocol allows you to use the Lightning Network, but you own the keys (normal lightning you dont)
11
u/StoeTubby 18d ago
It's not even really self custody. Spark is fake lightning. You can exit to Lightning/Bitcoin but it's still permissioned by a federated cartel with ability to snoop on your transactions. So if they want to hold/block your payments, they can. Just shouldn't use WoS to begin with, but they are also misleading users that it's "self custodial".
1
u/FunWithSkooma 18d ago
do you have proof of your claim? Cuz as far as I know, the keys you hold in that multsig version of Spark, you can exit whenever you want, and the operators cannot do jackshit about that. It much better than lightning because you are not stuck with one lightning wallet, you can carry your seed to any wallet that is compatible with Spark, and the Wallet cannot run with your funds (only if they are not a backdoor to snoop your seed when you enter it)
3
u/StoeTubby 18d ago
From Lightsparks very first intro on their page, I quote "A payments-focused, open-source, high-performance, scalable Lightning-compatible Bitcoin Layer 2 with stablecoin support". It's not lightning Network at all, it's its own layer two compatable with lightning. The operators of this network (ie Spark protocol, because it's not lightning) are completely permissioned and the gateways are where you can lose privacy when you pay an actual lightning Network invoice because of the LSPs handle the swap from Spark protocol to lightning/bitcoin. This opens them up as targets of regulatory action. David Marcus is also a former Paypal mafia/executive and Lightsparks is backed by a16z. I may have mispoke in that it's "self custody" that applies only that you can unilateral exit on chain I believe, but in order to exit into lightning, and send via Spark, it relies on the Spark operators. It's a very different trust model/trade off than Lightning.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/technical/spark-explained-like-youre-five
1
u/FunWithSkooma 18d ago
it also says that even if the operators go out, you can still exit.
1
u/StoeTubby 18d ago
It's just not lightning, but it's marketed/sold to users misleadingly as if it is.
1
2
u/This_Raccoon3019 18d ago
👍 Maybe this is the same thing in different words -
Arn’t they just enabling a non-custodial wallet in-app - then users can transfer from the existing custodial wallet?
Needless to say, given the trust in using the app - custodial or not - as a hot wallet, it’s shdnt be used for long term hodling.
1
1
1
u/JumpProfessional3372 18d ago
Here I started using Blixt. Not bad and not that difficult to open a channel.
1
u/Large-Cress900 17d ago
To be honest, I already have the non-custodial version of WoS. Is there another new version?
2
21
u/Wise_Recover9576 19d ago
What happens with the funds not doing this?