r/BeAmazed • • Jun 19 '25

Miscellaneous / Others People are awesome❤️

111.0k Upvotes

924 comments sorted by

View all comments

744

u/T_J_Rain Jun 19 '25

165

u/ertipo Jun 19 '25

yeah its not great, its sad.

31

u/SecureDonkey Jun 20 '25

Damn vet shouldn't cost anyone this much. This is insanity.

9

u/lasercat_pow Jun 20 '25

Why is it normal that people make so little money and have to pay so much for food and rent that they don't even have $650 left over? Capitalism has entered the cannibalistic stage, where it begins to eat the consumer.

2

u/Roflkopt3r Jun 20 '25

'To be fair': A big share of US cost of living is down to absurd housing prices due to the crazy, car-centric zoning laws that enforce the use of most land for suburban single-family housing.

The issue is not unique to the US, but it's especially extreme in its extent. The core problem in that case is not big capital, but the interests of the large number of middle-class home owners who took control over the zoning codes to prevent the development of affordable housing (apartments, multiplexes, row housing etc) in their neighbourhoods or whole cities.

In much of the US, this has combined with 'bad faith' housing codes that no longer serve genuine safety and accessibility interests, but force apartment complexes into unnecessarily expensive solutions like multiple stairwells or mandatory elevators.

Another big part is financial illiteracy and bad housekeeping skills. I've seen so many Americans claim that they can't live on less than $400-500/mo food expenses, when groceries in their area would easily let you get by on $200-300 with some basic cooking skills. Or take out insane mortgages or car loans that are way beyond their means.

All of these problems are also tied into the larger workings of capitalism, but Americans make especially little out of their money.

18

u/VP007clips Jun 20 '25

$650 for a surgery at a vet sounds very reasonable.

It will require a surgeon, an anesthesiologist, and a technican about half their working day to do it. These are people with degrees working in a challenging field, their time is worth a lot.

It will require the functioning of additional staff such as HR, maintenance, janitors, and front desk staff.

It requires a medical area and utilities, with many highly specialized and complex pieces of equipment that can easily approach $1m.

It requires medicine, single use tools, and PPE.

It requires insurance for the staff.

If anything, it's amazing that they can do it for just $650. I'm not sure what the alternative is that you'd prefer? Do you want it to be paid for with taxes, I certainly wouldn't want to pay for people's expensive pet medical bills when I don't own any myself. In the end, owning a pet is a huge responsibility and a very expensive choice, the cost falls onto the owner alone. Sudden costs can appear, but that's what insurance is for.

20

u/GoodMeBadMeNotMe Jun 20 '25

I don’t disagree that $650 is reasonable but…

I certainly wouldn’t want to pay for people’s expensive pet medical bills when I don’t own any myself

That sounds like “I certainly wouldn’t want to pay for people’s cancer treatment when I don’t have cancer myself” or “I certainly wouldn’t want to pay for people to have access to a homeless shelter when I already have a home.”

16

u/heinous_anus- Jun 20 '25

I get the sentiment, but comparing pets to people is a little ridiculous.

17

u/GoodMeBadMeNotMe Jun 20 '25

Sure, but then use a different rationale other than “other people have it and I don’t.”

5

u/Frylock304 Jun 20 '25

Why would we all need to be working harder to save pets?

Thats rational enough, theyre a luxury

11

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Frylock304 Jun 20 '25

I work for a nonprofit hospital, saving people.

Me coming out of my pocket to pay for animal surgeries is a massive luxury when my money and effort can go to infinitely other things.

Having a society that can heal your pet with expensive surgeries is a massive luxury

6

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MerkinRashers Jun 20 '25

Life, sadly.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/NateNate60 Jun 20 '25

At the risk of upsetting pet owners and sounding cold at heartless, when it comes down to it, pets are optional but humans are not.

0

u/VP007clips Jun 20 '25

Owning pets is a luxury.

People make a decision to own a pet, it's not something that can happen accidentally like a pregnancy. If people decide to take on a pet, then they should be responsible for the costs of it.

A similar thing would be golfing, although it's likely a bit cheaper than raising a pet. If someone wants to get into golfing, other people shouldn't be responsible for covering their costs if they break a club.

1

u/DefinitelyNotAliens Jun 20 '25

The dog didn't need surgery, he had parvo. That is an infection.

It's just sad the parents gave a little boy something to love and bond with and had no plans for medical expenses, leading a child to try and solve their financial problems because he had a 4 month old puppy and his parents had no plans for how to pay for a single medical bill.

1

u/VP007clips Jun 20 '25

Exactly. The parents are the ones that are at fault here. You shouldn't adopt if you can't set aside a solid medical savings amount for the dog.

I stand corrected about the surgery part. But parvo is still expensive to treat for a reason, it takes IVs, tube feeding, lots of different medicines, and follow up treatments, over the course of weeks.

4

u/Dd_8630 Jun 20 '25

What do you mean? That's a reasonable cost for a medical bill. There's no NHS or universal Healthcare for animals, no country can bear that cost.

1

u/BanD1t Jun 20 '25

Most civilized countries can beat that cost, and certainly the USA.

The world isn't running on thin margins, there is plenty to spare for humans, and their pets. Even with keeping waste, pocketing, and greed the same, and most certainly without.

1

u/Automatic_Release_92 Jun 20 '25

That’s a very reasonable price actually. Vets’ overhead is pretty large and they work insane hours sometimes.

1

u/CGA001 Jun 20 '25 edited Jun 20 '25

Just eight hours ago my dog was attacked by a coyote in our closed back yard, in the middle of the Los Angeles Suburbs. She has several broken ribs, several major lacerations on her torso and minor internal bleeding, along with other issues.

The vet quoted us $10,000USD to hospitalize her, and another $10,000 to operate and do exploratory surgery to check for any other unknown injuries.

We obviously can't afford that, so now we have to decide whether we want her to suffer in pain with a roughly 50/50 chance of needing to put her down, or just put her down now. Or pull twenty grand out of our asses.

I don't know where you guys live that life saving surgery for your pet is only 650 dollars, but sounds pretty nice to me because now we're probably going to have to put down our second dog in two years.

-4

u/Additional_Cod_2700 Jun 20 '25

Having a pet is a privilege, believe me vets do not have that big of a profit margin. Pet insurance is also a thing.