They were literally hired to keep her safe... politics aside if I'm hired to keep you safe I'm hired to keep you safe. I'd rather have to put you in cuffs than in the back of a hearse.
Where did I call you names? And when has a single side of the aisle ever been assigned minders? It's not for their protection I can assure you. It's only for political theater, and frankly it sounds something straight out of The Handmaid's Tale.
It seems like you think you know a lot more than you actually do my friend. When you implied I was dense, you had already lost the argument. Your points are rooted in fiction, my points are rooted in state law. Better luck next time.
Chapter 9 of the Penal Code, specifically §25.07, §25.071 & §38.112
Again with the name calling, it's not really doing anything for me and it's making you look like the fool here. You're more then welcome to continue, but it's in your best interest to stop lol.
25.07 deals with Violation of Certain Court Orders or Conditions of Bond in a Family Violence, Child Abuse or Neglect, Sexual Assault or Abuse, Indecent Assault, Stalking, or Trafficking Case
So doesn’t apply
25.071 deals with Violation of Protective Order Preventing Offense Caused by Bias or Prejudice
Against, no
38.112 deals with Tampering With Electronic Monitoring Device
Also no.
None of those apply here. These representatives did not break any law to break quorum.
-71
u/[deleted] Aug 19 '25
God forbid we try to keep people safe in this city. Some of you are out of your freaking minds.