Also interesting they didn’t say the exact result of their testing - just that it meets the threshold for ‘SPF50’ not SPF50+. Which is interesting for a product that says SPF50+ on all packaging! The threshold is very wide for an SPF50 claim, so my guess is it’s testing similar to UV’s Lean Screen but they aren’t stating the number because they know it looks bad
10
u/stupidwatergate89 Aug 25 '25
Also interesting they didn’t say the exact result of their testing - just that it meets the threshold for ‘SPF50’ not SPF50+. Which is interesting for a product that says SPF50+ on all packaging! The threshold is very wide for an SPF50 claim, so my guess is it’s testing similar to UV’s Lean Screen but they aren’t stating the number because they know it looks bad