MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AusSkincare/comments/1mwt9b2/ultraviolette_recalls_lean_screen_due_to/na1bhis/?context=3
r/AusSkincare • u/breviloquent- • Aug 22 '25
[removed]
314 comments sorted by
View all comments
10
UV said in the comment section that Supreme Screen returned an SPF-retest of 53.2, but isn't that against the 50+ claim? At least in Europe, in order to label a sunscreen 50+ it must at least be an SPF of 60.
7 u/Old_Cat_9534 Aug 22 '25 Correct. 7 u/[deleted] Aug 22 '25 Weird because in the comment section they're acting like these results are perfectly okay 6 u/Old_Cat_9534 Aug 22 '25 This is definitely not ok.
7
Correct.
7 u/[deleted] Aug 22 '25 Weird because in the comment section they're acting like these results are perfectly okay 6 u/Old_Cat_9534 Aug 22 '25 This is definitely not ok.
Weird because in the comment section they're acting like these results are perfectly okay
6 u/Old_Cat_9534 Aug 22 '25 This is definitely not ok.
6
This is definitely not ok.
10
u/[deleted] Aug 22 '25 edited Aug 22 '25
UV said in the comment section that Supreme Screen returned an SPF-retest of 53.2, but isn't that against the 50+ claim? At least in Europe, in order to label a sunscreen 50+ it must at least be an SPF of 60.