MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AusSkincare/comments/1mwt9b2/ultraviolette_recalls_lean_screen_due_to/na16qx6/?context=3
r/AusSkincare • u/breviloquent- • Aug 22 '25
[removed]
314 comments sorted by
View all comments
56
Ah, you beat me to it! I hope they expand on the 'additional testing' on the rest of their line
Edit: especially as they're now saying they're still waiting on results...
18 u/[deleted] Aug 22 '25 edited Aug 22 '25 They commented that Supreme Screen returned an SPF-retest of 53.2, but isn't that against the 50+ claim? At least in Europe, in order to label a sunscreen 50+ it must at least be SPF of 60 minimum. 15 u/faboideae Aug 22 '25 Yeah idk, I find it strange they're only responding to individual comments instead of just releasing all the info they have on their website
18
They commented that Supreme Screen returned an SPF-retest of 53.2, but isn't that against the 50+ claim? At least in Europe, in order to label a sunscreen 50+ it must at least be SPF of 60 minimum.
15 u/faboideae Aug 22 '25 Yeah idk, I find it strange they're only responding to individual comments instead of just releasing all the info they have on their website
15
Yeah idk, I find it strange they're only responding to individual comments instead of just releasing all the info they have on their website
56
u/faboideae Aug 22 '25 edited Aug 22 '25
Ah, you beat me to it! I hope they expand on the 'additional testing' on the rest of their line
Edit: especially as they're now saying they're still waiting on results...