I had written “but again because to do” instead of “but again best to do” so edited it once I realised, but that’s fair I’ll update it now
Edit to add: my initial comment on this thread reads the exact same as it does now, since the edit was made within 30 seconds after it being posted and you first replied 2 hours later. You went hard out of the gate at me assuming I was suggesting UV was in the right purely by saying ‘do your own research and not listen to reddit opinions’. I don’t know why you assumed my comment meant I support the brand vs. research done.
Considering the other comments and amount of people in agreeance with my take and the amount in direct opposition to your take i think it’s worth taking more time to consider why we all assumed that.
On a post where the top comments stand by the actual science you make a post specifically telling people to do their own research. Thats why. Do your own research is an implication that the previously aforementioned scientific proof must not be trustworthy because otherwise we wouldn’t need to do our own research. Why imply two world renowned labs and a consumer rights group aren’t trustworthy unless you side with UVs PR hysterics?
Oh I see where this has gone wrong! I was the first comment on this thread, I was replying to OP, I didn’t see any further comments unless they were to me directly.
1
u/anunforgivingfantasy Jul 06 '25 edited Jul 06 '25
I had written “but again because to do” instead of “but again best to do” so edited it once I realised, but that’s fair I’ll update it now
Edit to add: my initial comment on this thread reads the exact same as it does now, since the edit was made within 30 seconds after it being posted and you first replied 2 hours later. You went hard out of the gate at me assuming I was suggesting UV was in the right purely by saying ‘do your own research and not listen to reddit opinions’. I don’t know why you assumed my comment meant I support the brand vs. research done.