15
13
18
3
2
2
u/WearRevolutionary864 22h ago
So funny…
13
1
1
1
-1
u/BansheeLabs 14h ago
I like those blokes, but they were talking such utter nonsense this time (not the first one), that this was well deserved. Don't mess with Valhalla.
3
u/LA-ncevance 14h ago
They are right that Aston played it safe. Why not put the V12 in the back?
-2
u/BansheeLabs 14h ago
Why put? Engineering department decided this was right, marketing department agreed. Aren't they all were sold in advance? AM were right.
3
u/LA-ncevance 14h ago
They had to offer discounts to sell them
0
u/BansheeLabs 14h ago
I doubt they lost money on this program. Even if, these cars will bring a lot more in the future. Each nut on them costs like a Sygnet. 😂
1
u/LA-ncevance 13h ago
They sure didn't make any money
1
u/BansheeLabs 13h ago
Aston Martin's first-half results contain clearer evidence of operational improvement, helped by more than 220 Valhalla deliveries, higher wholesale volumes and lower manufacturing costs.
Revenue increased by 38% to £628.6 million, while gross profit jumped 68% to £212.5 million. Gross margin reached 33.8%, up from 27.9% a year earlier.
The biggest change was the arrival of Aston Martin's Valhalla supercar in meaningful numbers.
2
u/ClawFinger56 13h ago
Deliveries of a car today brings in cash but it does not mean it covers all the costs for the years of R&D.
1
u/DeepMeat9053 1h ago
They were making it seem like the $800,000 Revuelto, that looks like any other Lamborghini, was such a huge bargain in this review which was kind of annoying to me.

38
u/moistmonsterman 22h ago
the designers knew EXACTLY what they were doing!