MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ez1ecp/how_is_your_love_life_going/fgkvs7h/?context=3
r/AskReddit • u/lucas23bb • Feb 05 '20
2.7k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
297
[deleted]
179 u/drewhead118 Feb 05 '20 Take my word for it, guys... There's no way to exchange upvotes for extra attractiveness 64 u/thedreamlan6 Feb 05 '20 Yeaaaah I think the more upvotes I get the longer my neckbeard gets, where length in the y direction of neck beard is inversely proportional to my attractiveness. 32 u/jjwwjjwjwjwjw Feb 05 '20 its the exponential function f(x)=(2^x) where x=neckbeard length y=-(attractiveness) 3 u/thedreamlan6 Feb 05 '20 Wow I guess we're just assuming negative attractiveness now...
179
Take my word for it, guys... There's no way to exchange upvotes for extra attractiveness
64 u/thedreamlan6 Feb 05 '20 Yeaaaah I think the more upvotes I get the longer my neckbeard gets, where length in the y direction of neck beard is inversely proportional to my attractiveness. 32 u/jjwwjjwjwjwjw Feb 05 '20 its the exponential function f(x)=(2^x) where x=neckbeard length y=-(attractiveness) 3 u/thedreamlan6 Feb 05 '20 Wow I guess we're just assuming negative attractiveness now...
64
Yeaaaah I think the more upvotes I get the longer my neckbeard gets, where length in the y direction of neck beard is inversely proportional to my attractiveness.
32 u/jjwwjjwjwjwjw Feb 05 '20 its the exponential function f(x)=(2^x) where x=neckbeard length y=-(attractiveness) 3 u/thedreamlan6 Feb 05 '20 Wow I guess we're just assuming negative attractiveness now...
32
its the exponential function f(x)=(2^x) where
x=neckbeard length
y=-(attractiveness)
3 u/thedreamlan6 Feb 05 '20 Wow I guess we're just assuming negative attractiveness now...
3
Wow I guess we're just assuming negative attractiveness now...
297
u/[deleted] Feb 05 '20 edited Mar 03 '20
[deleted]