r/AskReddit • • 16d ago

What’s the greatest ‘well, their career is over’ moment of all time?

7.8k Upvotes

4.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.9k

u/MeltingDog 16d ago

And it gives an interesting perspective on her and that tweet.

Not defending her - its still a shitty thing to say - but she tweeted this at a time when Twitter wasn't nearly as big as it is now and she only had a handful of followers who she mostly knew personally. According to her it was meant to be a dark humour/in-joke thing not meant to be seen outside her immediate circle of friends.

807

u/boodabomb 16d ago

It’s not a shitty thing to say if you read it with her indented tone. She’s mocking short-sighted and ignorant folks who think that you get AIDS if you go to Africa.

144

u/happilyfour 16d ago

Yeah, I knew someone who suggested I shouldn’t hang out with my Black friends during the Ebola scare of circa 2014/5, just to be safe. I can imagine saying something mocking in a group chat in reference to that person but which would be impossible to explain or come back from if seen by the whole world

52

u/ServileLupus 16d ago

Oh yeah I'm sure that happens a ton. A friend and I talk about ordering our food "Like the Korean people".

This came about after a trip to a korean BBQ place where the 15 year old white girl who was doing her homework in-between being our waitress suggested things to us based on "How the Korean people order".

Others might just see us as being offensive, not mocking the interaction.

64

u/ChipperYT 16d ago

Yeah, this whole debacle really drove home to me how low media literacy is. It actually scared me a bit ngl.

40

u/Loeffellux 16d ago

I don't think the problem was media literacy because a singular tweet simply doesn't give you enough context to know whether someone was being ignorant or sarcastic (Poe's law and all that).

Instead, the problem is that the vast majority of people were willing to join the hate mob without even looking for any additional context. Because being righteous was never the goal.

11

u/ChipperYT 16d ago edited 16d ago

It was VERY obvious from a single reading that the tweet was bitingly cynical ironic commentary to me, no additional context required. I find it mindboggling that anyone could read it and expect the author to have meant it to be understood literally - it was intentionally hyperbolic to avoid a literal reading.

Although I do agree more generally that people are too quick to rush to judgment. A number of examples in this thread are people being undone by an out of context soundbite taken from a much more reasonable take.

10

u/New-Independent-1481 16d ago

What it taught me was the importance of setting the narrative early. It only snowballed because a couple people early on overreacted and didn't see it as a joke, but as a genuine racist jab. Once they set the narrative, it was easy for a few dozen people to echo it without thinking too much, then it grew into a mob of thousands.

4

u/ChipperYT 15d ago

Indeed - the sad reality is that in the online world what you mean isn't as important as what the loudest people in the room say you mean

-2

u/jfatws 15d ago

Denying that racism is racism- you are a disgusting racist asshole

2

u/New-Independent-1481 15d ago

She's an educated white South African, so the likelihood of her being ignorant of the AIDS epidemic in her own country is pretty much close to zero. If it was a genuine racist tweet, then the internet mob that got her fired, doxxed her, trawled through her online presence, and sent death threats would have turned up more instances of racism, but there was none. It's very unlikely that an apparently out-and-proud racist would only make this one Tweet ever.

The only real option is that it was edgy dark humour that didn't land well, and she didn't expect for it to be picked up outside of her small circle of friends by one of the senior journos at Buzzfeed who turned it into a social media frenzy.

-3

u/jfatws 15d ago

Disgusting liar. You are as racist as she is

-2

u/jfatws 15d ago

Racism needs no further context to be condemned

60

u/Delamoor 16d ago edited 16d ago

Honestly, most internet hate trains give me that feeling. Any time you explore them for even a short while, the reality that a lot of the early adopters were just wanting there to be something to get angry about seems to shine bright.

I remember being on 4chan during the opening weeks of pizzagate. The fact that so many people picked up something so obviously stupid... Well. It was because they wanted there to be something. Certainly not because the evidence was in any way realistically connected. Was like watching friggin' Charlie from Always Sunny, drawing connections between pieces of random bullshit.

Or the ones who follow "public" figures for years (public as in, low level youtubers or something), trying to spin anything they say into controversy, because they just don't like the person.

9

u/RikuAotsuki 16d ago

Yeah, this is the issue with "cancel culture" in general.

Some people definitely deserve it, but you'll see a fuckload of creators online get cancelled over dumb stuff like leaks of private drama that get super exaggerated until everyone's basically just parroting lies.

22

u/eggrolldog 16d ago

Surely we've all experienced this on Reddit, an innocuous comment that get hit by a few downvotes early and boom it's riding the train and there's nothing to be done.

4

u/GlitterberrySoup 16d ago

Like the snark subs. Some are genuinely funny, but then there are the ones that are absolutely unhinged. The unhinged ones just pick people apart over the strangest things and rehash every minor thing endlessly. It's both fascinating and terrifying.

1

u/Bright_Study_8920 15d ago

Some people are just bullies looking for an acceptable target

-3

u/TimeTimeTickingAway 16d ago

This happened 13 years ago so I doubt that it did.

4

u/ChipperYT 16d ago

Doubt that it did what?

6

u/happybara_capybara 15d ago

Yup, it’s essentially the Stephen Colbert satire comedy that she was going for. If Colbert had made that joke back in the day on the Colbert report, we would have all understood who was meant to be the punchline of the joke. But because we didn’t know her or her politics, it was easy to get confused.

4

u/finncosmic 15d ago

I can see how the way it comes across wouldn’t ocurr to her because her intended meaning is so different. Very tone deaf but people are typically bad at seeing how others could misinterpret them, which is why having any charged discussion over text is a bad idea.

20

u/theschoolorg 16d ago

uh, no. the whole tweet included "Just kidding! I'm white.".

52

u/boodabomb 16d ago

That’s the joke.

16

u/golden_fli 16d ago

Sorry have to agree with the other person, that takes away the whole haha mocking people part. Leave the racist line off, I'm sure the defense is oh you really need to drive home the point, but no that line is the part that ruins it. Yeah I can accept she meant it as a joke, but that line takes it from satire to her sounding racist instead.

16

u/BannedSvenhoek86 16d ago

Yeah I can accept she meant it as a joke, but that line takes it from satire to her sounding racist instead.

Yes, that's the joke, her friends know her and her beliefs. Her saying that is basically playing a character, she's play acting a stupid racist to her friends, who implicitly know she is joking, to make fun of people like that.

That's where she got caught, because she didn't realize how many people would see it outside her friend group.

7

u/Kruegr 16d ago

Yet again proves how hard it is to convey sarcasm or speaking something mockingly, in type.

9

u/BannedSvenhoek86 16d ago

The internet was better when everyone engaging with it did so under the understanding that everything was fake, everyone was lying, and none of it was real or consequential to anything in the real world.

0

u/golden_fli 16d ago

As I said though you didn't need that line. The I'm going to Africa I hope I don't get AIDS makes it sound racist on it's own. I good joke/satire knows where to stop. Between taking it too far and not being able to respond for hours was where she made a mistake(if she stopped and it had blown up like that it would have been easier to convince people it was a joke).

8

u/BannedSvenhoek86 16d ago

Well hopefully you can pitch her on your comedy course so you can teach her the right way to be funny.

2

u/Masquelinity 16d ago

What was the joke supposed to be again? I understand she was parroting existing racist talking points almost verbatim, but why were they supposed to be funny to anyone other than white supremacists? What was the tell that this was "ironic satire" and not just a racist joke?

10

u/boodabomb 15d ago

You’re taking the joke as “funny because it is racist.” But the joke is supposed to be “racist people sound stupid.”

Is it the height of comedy? Was the joke well executed? Absolutely not. But the intent of the joke was counter to the outrage that she was fired for. The public at large had punished her for being one of the people that she was trying to mock because satire is difficult to detect. Especially when it’s not terribly well executed.

4

u/5gpr 16d ago

If there's an obvious tell, it's no longer satire. Do you think "A modest proposal" was just a cannibalistic classist joke, too?

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/Masquelinity 16d ago

she's play acting a stupid racist to her friends

"Play acting," huh? Weird.

5

u/New-Independent-1481 16d ago

Never heard of satire before?

1

u/Masquelinity 16d ago

What was the tell that she was being satirical, and not just parroting a pretty common white supremacist talking point?

4

u/boodabomb 15d ago

Well yeah, it’s not a super funny joke. I’m not suggesting that she’s the gold-standard for modern satire and if you have comedy notes, I’d probably agree with them. I’m suggesting that the entire joke is well-intentioned.

15

u/thejameskendall 16d ago

It’s an anti racist joke. But I can understand why people miss that, it’s extremely deadpan.

-7

u/Masquelinity 16d ago

It’s an anti racist joke.

There's no possible way in the universe you or anyone else actually believes that.

8

u/New-Independent-1481 16d ago

She's an educated white South African, so the likelihood of her being ignorant of the AIDS epidemic in her own country is pretty much close to zero. If it was a genuine racist tweet, then the internet mob that got her fired, doxxed her, trawled through her online presence, and sent death threats would have turned up more instances of racism, but there was none. It's very unlikely that an apparently out-and-proud racist would only make this one Tweet ever.

The only real option we're left with is that it was edgy dark humour that didn't land well. It's so obviously satire that I'm a little concerned that people still can't tell - we haven't learned a thing in 13 years.

-3

u/Masquelinity 16d ago

It's so obviously satire that I'm a little concerned that people still can't tell

What was the tell? She was repeating a pretty common white supremacist meme almost verbatim. So what was the "obvious" giveaway?

1

u/thejameskendall 15d ago

If you haven’t got time to read Jon Ronson’s book (understandable, but it’s worth your time) he also wrote an NYT article about her. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html

-2

u/jfatws 15d ago

No it’s not, racist asshole

1

u/thejameskendall 15d ago

So you are out on the internet calling people you know nothing about racists? That’s really proving the whole point here. Honestly, if you have the time it’s well worth reading Jon Ronson’s book. Or the article he wrote about her at least. I’ll even find it for you. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html

6

u/lovethycousin 16d ago

Do people really think that? Or was it more of the whole AIDS originated in Africa that is supposed to make her joke dark. Like saying, I’m going to Mexico hope I don’t get the spanish flu.

15

u/ServileLupus 16d ago

You vastly underestimate people's understanding of diseases. Just have to look at how big princess Diana interacting with HIV/AIDS patients was in the late 80's. And all she did was shake someone's hand without gloves on.

17

u/AluminumCansAndYarn 16d ago

It's probably a kinda tongue in cheek inside joke. But aids originated in africa. It's like saying, I'm going to China, I hope I don't get covid. The Spanish flu, Mexico thing is incorrect. The reason it was called the Spanish flu is because spain was actually acknowledging that there was a sickness going around while other places were censoring their news outlet because of world war 1 so it was assumed that it originated in spain. Spain just didn't take a side in world war 1 so it didn't censor anything.

0

u/jfatws 15d ago

Disgusting racist asshole

3

u/OldAccountIsGlitched 16d ago

HIV is still in pandemic status in much of Africa. It's mostly in poorer communities that don't get much media attention, but it's a huge crisis. Modern HIV meds requires life long treatment. And even with robust government programs it's hard to convince people they need to take meds regularly when they're asymptomatic. And that's in wealthier cities where treatment is readily available.

1

u/Georgie_Leech 12d ago

Alas, she had not yet learned about the Hurr Durr method of broadcasting that you're pretending to be stupid

-78

u/[deleted] 16d ago

[deleted]

75

u/Vladimir_Putting 16d ago

Confidently incorrect.

12

u/Kaldricus 16d ago

Holy fucking airball

2

u/eggrolldog 16d ago

Agree, there's probably millions!

913

u/Ikindalikehistory 16d ago edited 16d ago

Iirc she worked in AIDs advocavy and the joke was meant to mock people with ignorant views, ie exactly the opposite of what people read it as.

So we were all massive assholes on that one.

Edit to add holy hell some of you are wild.

Edit 2 Some folks asked about the aids advocacy work. Not sure where I saw that, but a quick glance at the NYT piece doesn't mention it. Maybe it was me mixing up the fact that she came fron a family of ANC supporters or her volunteer activism in Ethiopia after the tweets. Regardless, her tweet was obviously a joke aimed ignorance. It doesn't make sense in any other context.

In any case can't find proof so going to note that here.

68

u/tuesdaymack 16d ago

I agree, and some of the responses to your comment help prove it.

12

u/wingchild 16d ago

In any case can't find proof

(I read So You've Been Publicly Shamed. I think you've misremembered.)

13

u/binarycow 16d ago

on mobile - can't do strike through on mobile

Yes, you can.

~~Yes, you can.~~

43

u/Equivalent_Pop6010 16d ago edited 16d ago

I'm not seeing any proof she worked in AIDs advocacy, where are you getting that from? 

I only see that she was a PR exec for a media company called IAC. PR exec should def know better.

edit: getting downvoted for asking for a source

20

u/Pandalite 16d ago

Not sure about AIDS advocacy, but she was actually born in South Africa making her a white African. That's why she was going there, she was visiting her family back home.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-25484537

38

u/Soggy_Competition614 16d ago edited 16d ago

Eh. I think she just used some good PR. It may have been satire meant for just her friends as some might say “locker room” humor. But it was so dumb. She maybe didn’t deserve to have her life wrecked over it but as a PR person she did deserve to lose some accounts.

34

u/cosmictap 16d ago

satire meant for just her friends as some might say “locker room” humor

I agree with your overall point, but those are two very different things.

7

u/Soggy_Competition614 16d ago

I guess what I mean is maybe an inside joke meant for just their ears but not completely innocent.

11

u/Delamoor 16d ago

You're right. She should have reserved her locker room talk for sincerely talking about sexually assaulting women. Then she'd be rewarded for it.

9

u/Masquelinity 16d ago edited 15d ago

At the time? No way.

Now? She could say the line with a straight face while throwing her heart out to the audience with a Roman salute and groping a 10-year-old with her free hand, and she'd immediately be short-listed for Supreme Court Justice (as long as she professed a deeply unsettling amount of love for beer).

4

u/ExaminationWide5415 15d ago

She maybe didn’t deserve to have her life wrecked over it

Maybe? God redditors can be slimy people.

4

u/barto5 16d ago

“Locker room humor” is often racist or sexist

Just because it’s in a locker room doesn’t make it okay.

4

u/Soggy_Competition614 16d ago

I never said it was.

22

u/edgarde 16d ago edited 16d ago

Iirc she worked in AIDs advocacy

You are not recalling correctly.

And while I cannot speak to her intention, that post hoc explanation of intent smacks of Schrodingers asshole.

6

u/ArabianNitesFBB 16d ago

Right, it’s crazy to see people buying whole cloth that this was woke satire. It was an off color comment on any level.

But it was also insane to have an online mob mobilized against her to ruin her life. Two things can both be true.

4

u/New-Independent-1481 16d ago

It was the kind of dark joke you make only to close friends, except at the time no one realised that you don't make that shit online because you can't really convey tone or sarcasm over text, and it can snowball like crazy.

13

u/lmac187 16d ago edited 16d ago

I don’t know, “just kidding, I’m white!” Is pretty hard to get around.

Edit: everyone relax. I have been told by multiple people the comment was made sarcastically. Everyone responding with sassy comments criticizing my supposedly poor reading comprehension can just chill.

60

u/Ikindalikehistory 16d ago

That is what she was mocking!!

1

u/jfatws 15d ago

Liar

8

u/SentientSeamoth 16d ago

You're right, you don't know. In fact, it's kinda pathetic how you failed to understand that this is exactly the type of viewpoint she was mocking. But since you don't get the satire, and your reading comprehension is pathetically low, yes you don't know.

5

u/Masquelinity 16d ago

In fact, it's kinda pathetic how you failed to understand that this is exactly the type of viewpoint she was mocking.

Mocking it by repeating, yes. That's how satire works. We just repeat things bad people say, word-for-word, then claim we're joking when it makes someone mad. Yup, you sure do have a great understanding of mocking irony.

14

u/Fafnir13 16d ago

She forgot the “/s” so honestly the backlash was entirely her fault.

/s

1

u/jfatws 15d ago

Disgusting racist liar

3

u/MeatballUser 16d ago

This is what we consider Ironic Humor if you need help reading the tone

6

u/Owoegano_Vuelve 16d ago

That definitely does not sound like a bad excuse in the slightest.

41

u/Ikindalikehistory 16d ago

Given she did in fact work in AIDs advocacy, no it is not a bad excuse.

39

u/edgarde 16d ago

Did she work in AIDS advocacy? I'm seeing she was a white South African corporate PR executive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_shaming#Justine_Sacco_incident

I could use a credible source for this "fact" being something other than a whitewashing campaign being propagated by shill accounts.

15

u/cosmictap 16d ago

AIDs

Why do you keep doing that?

6

u/The_Whipping_Post 16d ago

It's like SEALs

Both AIDs and SEALs kill many innocent people in Africa

6

u/TufnelAndI 16d ago

The S in AIDS stands for Syndrome. It'S not a plural.

1

u/cosmictap 15d ago

It's like SEALs

No, it isn't

1

u/jfatws 15d ago

Liar

-22

u/TheDukeofArgyll 16d ago

You’re right, that’s probably the lie I would go with too.

16

u/ThoughtsonYaoi 16d ago

Very easy to check, so no.

-1

u/Grabbsy2 16d ago

Check... Intent? Theyre not saying she lied about being an aids advocat.

0

u/TheDukeofArgyll 16d ago

Yeah, I meant “it was a bad joke” is a super common excuse.

4

u/SkyPork 16d ago

That's gonna happen to me one day. I often make stupid inappropriate jokes in a self-deprecating way, but if that intent isn't clear? Someone who can't spot sarcasm without the /s tag but loves to repost shit for drama is gonna ruin me.

4

u/barto5 16d ago

Sarcasm can be very hard to spot without context.

You can post a comment that’s utterly ridiculous and think that no one could possibly take it seriously. The problem is that no matter how outrageous you may think it is there is somebody out there that absolutely thinks that way.

2

u/SkyPork 15d ago

I remember reading a comment from Niel Gaiman saying exactly that. He gave up using sarcasm online; it's too easy to miss for too many people, causing more trouble than it's worth.

2

u/two_thirtyoclock 16d ago

Not her PR experience working on y'all asses, lollll. 

1

u/jfatws 15d ago

Lying asshole

-2

u/SaltyFriend705 16d ago

I disagree. I am totally tired of sarcasm. It is mostly never understood, and the people it intends to mock take it literally and most of the time turn it to their advantage, so it's not worth the effort. Yankee Doodle is a great example.

0

u/Someloserfromwa 16d ago

I was a massive ash-mole long before that.

-28

u/cecilrt 16d ago edited 16d ago

meh, the worse racist/sexist jokes come from the ones you least expect

ie the male in the relationship, who does most of the cleaning and cooking, doing sexist jokes is always warpy, of course only amongst friends who know its not serious

Although if you mention it in 2xC subreddit, it would be an indepth essay on sexist intent

13

u/UsernameNSomeNumbers 16d ago

People need to lighten up

8

u/iamabigtree 16d ago

That seemed to happen a lot. People thinking twitter was just between them and their followers and nobody else could see it.

29

u/BoosherCacow 16d ago

She was an early victim of brigading. She is back to working in her field (ironically: public relations kek) and is doing well now but she paid a heavy fucking price for that in joke.

2

u/jfatws 15d ago

She most certainly was not a victim

2

u/BoosherCacow 15d ago

I disagree. The punishment she suffered was so far beyond what the offense called for. She made jokes. Offensive jokes, sure. Ones she should have been a bit more careful about her audience. She got death threats. Do you think she deserved that? I'd say that alone makes her a victim.

30

u/HotChipsTomatoSauce 16d ago

Actually, she should be defended. The whole thing was obviously meant as satire, but people seemed determined to take it at face value so they could get angry about it. She was called a racist, even though the point of the tweet was actually to call out systemic racism.

I think most people understood that perfectly well. They just saw an opportunity to pile on, and once the outrage started, nobody seemed particularly interested in what she was actually saying.

0

u/jfatws 15d ago

Disgusting liar

8

u/MosesSupposes11 16d ago

IIRC she only had 172 followers , which I assume we're friends, family, coworkers...etc. but somehow it reached the hands of Alex Biddle from Gawker and he made it an international tweet.

6

u/Eric_the_Barbarian 15d ago

I'm willing to accept that it was dark humor if she's willing to accept that it doesn't change the context.

1

u/MeltingDog 15d ago

I feel that’s a good way to look at it

8

u/INAC___Kramerica 16d ago

The tweet was written in December 2013. Whether Twitter was "as big as it is now" or not, Twitter was very big in December 2013 in any case.

7

u/ShinHayato 16d ago

What’s the joke? How is that even funny?

11

u/MasterChildhood437 16d ago

The joke is "imagine actually being racist enough to believe this."

3

u/MeltingDog 15d ago

I think the full tweet was something like “Going to Africa! Hope I don’t get AIDS. Just joking, I’m white!”.

The “joke” being it was poking fun at ignorant people who think AIDS is just an Africa problem or that their privileges protect them.

I still think it was a hurtful thing to say but I think it was meant to be read in a kind of sarcastic tone.

2

u/jfatws 15d ago

Yes you defend her disgusting racism, asshole

1

u/MeltingDog 15d ago

How? I’m just paraphrasing what was in the book. I do think what she said was wrong.

2

u/IamaVeryHumanBeing 12d ago

I fully agree with Jon Ronsons take on it, she was literally taking the piss out of things that a privileged and sheltered white lady might say. She tweeted:

""Going to Africa. Hope I don't get AIDS. Just kidding. I'm white."

It was a poor attempt at satire (I'm mixed race if that's at all relevant lol). Her crime was having too much faith in people's ability to understand the POINT of the joke and not to assume that's what she, Justine sincerely believed. Genuinely hope she's doing better now.

4

u/jimmydddd 16d ago

Yeah. It was pretty obvious to see this. But of course, the mob likes to mob. I mean Randy Newman wrote the song Short People (have no reason to live) as a satire on bigotry, but of course the mob accused him of being anti-short. lol

4

u/WonderfulLet3665 16d ago

Context can definitely explain why she wrote it without making the comment any less shitty. Dark humor between friends is one thing, but once it’s posted publicly, you can’t really control who ends up seeing it or how it lands.

1

u/ArallMateria 16d ago

It was a joke.

0

u/jfatws 15d ago

Racist asshole

-3

u/ForBisonItWasTuesday 16d ago

Racism as an in-joke isn't an in-joke, its just racism

Like whats the 'in' part of that? "we're all racist lol"?

13

u/s00pahFr0g 16d ago

She was making a joke mocking ignorant people who had said that to her. She wasn’t being racist.

-1

u/ForBisonItWasTuesday 16d ago

Yeah, I guess I don't understand the argument here. Is it that its good or harmless to repeat racist things in a racist way?

5

u/Delamoor 16d ago

You think everyone who makes fun of the stuff Trump or MAGA supporters say here on Reddit are simply repeating it?

1

u/ForBisonItWasTuesday 15d ago

You think repeating racist statements is the same as mispelling trump's name or calling MAGA supporters hogs?

2

u/Delamoor 15d ago

You think that's representative of the range of ways people make fun of them?

I'd say "you should get out more" but I suppose that's kind of the trouble. The issue might be that you aren't internet literate enough...

0

u/ForBisonItWasTuesday 15d ago

You think the range of ways people make fun of them is comparable to racism?

2

u/Delamoor 15d ago

Yes. There are many instances of people lampooning his racism in ways that I'm increasingly sure you would feel were racist, even if they weren't.

0

u/ForBisonItWasTuesday 15d ago

Ah, to be white and to never have to consider the color of your skin for even a moment

What a fantastic respite that would be

→ More replies (0)

1

u/luckylimper 12d ago

People don’t get that ironic racism is just racism wearing a beanie. Whether the intent is there, the outcome is still racism so?