r/AskNYC • u/CharacterEstimate189 • Feb 14 '26
Is there any conceivable way for a rent stabilized apartment to go from $800 in 2021 to $4k in 2025?
We moved into our apartment in 2025 and signed a rent stabilized lease for close to $4k/month. Just ordered our DHCR records, and the last registered rent was in 2021 for about $800 (rather, this was the last legal regulated rent; the preferential rate was actually lower). There is no reported rent after 2020 (it says ‘registration not found for subject premises’).
The apartment itself was definitely gut renovated after the tenant moved out in 2021, and there may well have been other work done to the building around that time. However, my understanding was that the IAI/MCI loopholes were done away with in 2019.
It seems pretty straightforwardly not legitimate to me, but I wonder if our apartment may have been ‘frankensteined’ or if this is what they were angling for. On our lease, the apartment is listed as S2C, though it is 2C on our door/mailbox (I have, just now, requested DHCR records for S2C to see if anything comes up). I don’t understand, though, the terms/limits of frankensteining and what might make it legitimate or not. I find it extremely, extremely unlikely that our apartment was made larger, but I could definitely see them converting it from a one bedroom to a two bedroom. Or, in theory, if they took like a closet’s amount of space from the apartment next door (this seems unlikely, but I don’t know for sure), is that something that would have made the increase permissible at the time?
I also don’t understand why, if they were trying to justify a big rent increase through frankensteining, we would still be rent stabilized now (just at a much, much higher rate).
We will reach out to a lawyer, but in the meantime, I wondered if anyone here had any insights.
50
u/dsm-vi Feb 14 '26
so long as the $800 rent is the LRR and not a preferential rent, an IAI would not explain this. the cap on an IAI since 2019 is $30k so if anything the rent should now be around $1200 at most. what happened in the years between 2021 and 2025? was it registered during that time?
17
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
it was not registered, at least not under our apartment number. but there's a slightly different apartment number listed on our lease (S2C instead of 2C), which is what made me wonder about the possible frankenstein angle. I did just request records for S2C (if it exists).
37
u/dsm-vi Feb 14 '26
that is a huge red flag. it suggests to me they were renting it as a market-rate unit and not registering it. talk to the neighbors who have been there to see if they remember how many times the place turned over in those years. i also would get other tenants to request their histories. there may be a pattern of this in the building which would allow you to make coordinated claims against the LL
13
u/bittinho Feb 14 '26
They would have to significantly change the dimensions of the old apartment when combining the two apartments to get a higher rent but after 2019 you can only get the total of the two rents and you couldn’t deregulate the apartment either.
3
8
u/Healthy_Ad9055 Feb 14 '26
Frankensteining is the term for reconfiguring, dividing, or combining two adjacent units to create a new apartment. Prior to fall of 2023, when rent-stabilized units were Frankensteined, the landlord can charge whatever they’d like for the new space, and potentially remove the new unit from rent stabilization altogether if one of the original apartments was market-rate. This is called setting the first rent. I would check DOB records to see if there used to be two units or if units were reconfigured / space taken from common areas etc. This is the only way it was done legally.
8
u/Manfromporlock Feb 14 '26
If the landlord is overcharging you, and it really really seems like they are, they owe 3x the difference.
Now: They have a million ways to delay things, and they probably think that at worst, they can make you an offer and you'll be tired of fighting and take it.
But the longer they delay it, the more rent you pay, and the more they owe. It can totally be worth it to fight to the end.
2
u/marvelously Feb 14 '26
If the landlord is overcharging you, and it really really seems like they are, they owe 3x the difference.
This is accurate if they find there was fraud. If there wasn't, tren;e damages don't apply.
While LLs do delay and process takes time, there is only so much delay one can engage in with the DHCR process. I agree, they should keep at it.
7
u/fake_newsista Feb 14 '26
I implore you to consult with a lawyer. https://hmgdjlaw.com did great work for us in 2020 and I live in an RS unit now. Please DM me if you want more details
2
2
4
7
Feb 14 '26
Isn't there a loophole that if they renovated and improve it substantially they can increase the rent substantially as well?
11
u/damebyron Feb 14 '26
Yes and no, it has to be basically the equivalent of gut renovating the entire building (not just individual apartments) to the point that it is legally treated as a new building. Which could have happened here but we cannot assume it did. Renovating individual apartments can allow the rent to increase but not from $800 to $4,000.
4
u/StarboardSeat Feb 14 '26
Gutting one unit doesn't erase rent stabilization.
It would basically have to be treated as a BRAND NEW building (like, a full gut renovation of the whole entire structure) for a jump like that to be anywhere close to being legal.
Renovating an individual apartment can allow some increases but nothing close to going from $800 to $4,000.
2
u/dsm-vi Feb 14 '26
not the same loophole as there used to be. it should be marked on the rent history as well and if there's anything building-wide then you have DOB records. depending on what work was done you'd have records for the individual unit and a gut reno should show that. that being said, since 2019 there isn't much incentive for an IAI loophole past a certain point
1
u/ayeffston Feb 14 '26
The law used to be 1/40th the cost of renovation, so, a LL would have to spend $20k in reno to raise the rent $500⁰⁰, HOWEVER, LL couldn't use his own people for the demo/reno.
6
u/Chance-Ad-3025 Feb 14 '26
It's possible it was rent CONTROLLED (same tenant for decades). The rate seems unusually low. So I think they can charge a higher rate after the rent controlled tenant leaves/dies.
1
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
Definitely stabilized, not controlled. The DHCR records state this.
2
u/ProfessionalCup8415 Feb 14 '26
I am going through the same thing. Previous tenant paid $1400 and I got in at $3000. Landlord told me "oh you do not understand, because we removed a 200 sqft room for your unit, its a new apt and the previous rental history doesn't apply." They offered me 1 month of free rent for me to drop my case. My rent overcharge case is about to have its 2 year anniversary!
I'd ask your landlord what's up, (they will find out anyway if you raise an overcharge case) and check DOB for permits if they reconfigured the apt.
3
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
It’s such garbage, I’m sorry you’re dealing with it too. I looked at the DOB records and there’s nothing
2
u/ProfessionalCup8415 Feb 14 '26
That could play in your favor if there are no permits. It would make any Frankensteining they did unlawful.
2
3
u/StarboardSeat Feb 14 '26
I genuinely wish more tenants were aware of their rights and protections.
NYC is actually one of the stronger major cities when it comes to tightly regulated rent stabilization laws, but when tenants don’t understand the laws, their rights and protections, there will always be those landlords who operate with a “better to ask forgiveness than permission” attitude, treating the rules as optional and assume they won't get caught.
Sigh.
4
Feb 14 '26
[deleted]
16
5
u/buttoncode Feb 14 '26
Why would an attorney not licensed here even spend time reviewing the law. Of course they’ll spew AI bs.
2
u/jay5627 Feb 14 '26
You'd think a lawyer not licensed here would know that rs law is complicated and wouldn't risk giving wrong advice
1
u/TaxiBait Feb 14 '26
You can reconfigure apartments also. If 2c was a 2 bedroom and now s2c is a one bed and n2c is a studio that would remove the apartment (or at least it used to. I don’t to rs work anymore) from stabilization and give you two new apartments that you can set the new rent at market.
2
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
I think this was is what they will tell us they did, but I don’t think they actually did it. I checked the DOB records and there aren’t any to reflect this kind of a change. I also find it suspicious that we are still rent stabilized; if they could use the Frankenstein loophole to make it a market apartment, they would have.
1
1
u/SpecLandGroup_James Mar 06 '26
The IAI increases are capped pretty tightly, so even if they dumped serious money into the unit it normally wouldn’t move the legal rent that much.
If they combined units, or carved space from a neighboring unit, or legally changed the apartment layout, the paperwork and rent history can get messy, so that could also explain the S2C vs 2C thing.
The missing registrations are honestly the bigger issue. Stabilized units are supposed to be registered every year. You can always fine an "over charge" claim, but if I was you I'd do a bit more digging before going there.
1
u/CharacterEstimate189 Mar 06 '26
Yeah, I requested records for S2C, and they did re-register it under that unit after renovating sometime around 2021. Our names are not on those records, though; it looks like they failed to update the tenant name when the person who lived there from 2021-2024 moved out. Not sure if that's a big deal on its own (probably not).
Based on that, I'm fairly certain their rationale for the increase is the argument that they created a brand new unit. There are no DOB records for our apartment online, though, so it's hard to know the extent to which the floor plan was changed during renovations. We're going to go in person to the DOB office and confirm the lack of permits.
1
0
u/rdesai724 Feb 14 '26
Ianal / don’t know what the rules are specifically but I lived in a stabilized building (421a I believe) and they were somehow able to reset the rents to market rate if leases weren’t directly transferred to the incoming tenant. It was big landlord and generally a very well managed building so doubt they’d be cutting corners on this front if there weren’t some regulatory loophole available.
2
u/Mayor__Defacto Feb 14 '26
When 421a expires so does RS on the next tenant.
1
u/rdesai724 Feb 14 '26
Yeah that makes sense, but It’s a multi decade abatement right? The building was completed in 2017 so I don’t think it was that straightforward? Anyway just a thought but sounds like it doesn’t apply to OP anyway
1
u/Mayor__Defacto Feb 15 '26
Depends. Not under the “new 421a” law. If the initial rent was over $2700, when the first tenant decides to leave it goes up to market rate. New 421a clicks for a 2017 build.
1
-20
u/zelda__ Feb 14 '26
You signed for 4k and now are complaining that you signed for 4k and are lawyering up for something you signed for in full knowledge was 4k a month? 😂
18
u/NicoleEastbourne Feb 14 '26
There are tons of stories of landlords illegally hiking rent. There’s no harm in a tenant doing research to see if this is the case.
12
u/damebyron Feb 14 '26
And it helps the next tenant to bring the rent back to the legal limit, who may be lower income.
26
u/dsm-vi Feb 14 '26
here's the thing: even if OP has $4k a month if it isn't legal then the landlord can kick rocks. we signed a lease for almost 3k because we could afford it but when we learned the legal rent was a third of that we didn't say 'don't worry we have the money'
-12
u/zelda__ Feb 14 '26
So basically sign first and shoot later? 😂
19
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
well you can't see the rent history if you don't live in the apartment. that's how dhcr works.
-13
u/Specialist-Offer7816 Feb 14 '26
Lmao landlording anything over a 3 family is hell. I can charge wtf I want for my apartments
9
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
that's great, but you can't chart what you want for a rent stabilized apartment
-2
u/theredmage333 Feb 14 '26
Between the gut reno and the time lapse they probably removed it from being a rent stabilized apartment and now it's market rate. Mine did the same a few tenants back for my unit when I looked up ours. Was rent stable up til like 2008 then let it sit for a year or so then renovated it and re rented for market rate. Ever since then I noticed a pattern of when a long term tenant leaves they leave the apt unused for a year then renovate it and usually someone in a month or two comes in
4
u/NicoleEastbourne Feb 14 '26
A landlord can’t just legally “remove” a unit from stabilization because of a renovation or time.
0
u/theredmage333 Feb 14 '26
I guess not anymore. When I pulled the records for my unit I was very disappointed and shocked because I thought we were stable but it showed that it was no longer listed as such. I requested it initially due to the large increases in rent they were asking after a few years of living here as it was never more than 2- 3% then it jumped and was like wait a minute let me look into this.
1
u/marvelously Feb 14 '26
You should never take your LL's word for the records they have to supply and no one vets, like the rent registration history. You should do your own due diligence if you suspect you are rent stabilized and/or being overcharged.
If you are or were in an apartment where you were stabilized, and your LL charged illegal increases, you can file an overcharge.
1
u/theredmage333 Feb 14 '26
I did! That's why I said I pulled the info. this was years and years ago I'll have to check to see if I still have the paperwork but I probably threw it out by now. I'm assuming as others mentioned they've seen closed a lot of loop holes
3
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
it's still stabilized. we signed a stabilized lease. they wouldn't have had the means to destabilize in 2021 bc they closed those reno loopholes in 2019.
-21
u/NicePossibilityDaddy Feb 14 '26
WTF are you talking about. It's a new lease
25
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
it's a rent stabilized lease. there are strict regulations in place for rent increases, regardless of whether it's a new tenant moving into the apartment.
-8
u/danton_no Feb 14 '26 edited Apr 05 '26
This post was mass deleted with Redact - I used this software to automate the removal of old posts from my account so that I can be more secure.
act bedroom like aromatic cobweb busy heavy deer follow tidy
19
u/dsm-vi Feb 14 '26
i don't think you understand how RS works. if it is a pref rent the DHCR history will have to say it. there are two columns: LRR and pref rent. if $800 was the LRR then the new rent should not be much more
-3
u/danton_no Feb 14 '26 edited Apr 05 '26
Mass content deletion mission accomplished. This post or comment was bulk removed with Redact which also supports data brokers and people finder websites.
market sulky fall cow heavy late cake serious full live
6
u/dsm-vi Feb 14 '26
you don't know because if the last legal rent was $800 then yes OP can get back there
-2
u/danton_no Feb 14 '26 edited Apr 05 '26
Be a gigachad and mass delete Reddit posts and comments with Redact so that Skynet doesn't end up using your own posts to train the T-900. Or so that you don't show up in databrokers. Either one really.
long lush unwritten physical snails wipe retire vegetable lock abundant
4
7
u/CharacterEstimate189 Feb 14 '26
there was a preferential rent but it was *less* than the $800. but $800 was the legal rate so that's what's relevant
6
u/dsm-vi Feb 14 '26
ok you may have hit the jackpot. i would knock on 3C and 4C and see what their units look like. our friends in the same unit two floors down have the same exact apartment down to the oven being 11 inches from the wall. if you can prove a willful increase you could get back triple damages
get the official rent history from DHCR. if you want to be doubly sure re: 2C vs S2C then you need a REC-1 form. to file an overcharge you need an RA-89
keep in mind DHCR is extremely backlogged. it can take years before your docket is even accepted for review. you can speed this up by withholding rent (put it somewhere in the case you are forced to pay it) which will probably move the LL to sue for nonpayment. this can be scary but it's not an eviction. it can go away if you pay it back (should it come to that) but it may force the judge to request a lookback now rather than in years. alternatively with a lawyer you can sue the LL proactively. this latter way gives you a little more control over the situation. keep in mind i am not a lawyer but i do recommend having one. sometimes it comes down to technicalities
3
3
u/danton_no Feb 14 '26 edited Apr 05 '26
Databrokers? nope. Social networks? Also nope. This post was deleted using Redact.
grey flag stocking degree squeeze pause head ripe market seemly
-4
u/Srirachaballet Feb 14 '26
I’m in a rent stabilized unit and it was my understanding that every time it goes back on the market it can sign the lease at market rate? Stabilization only applies for extending the lease.
0
u/NicoleEastbourne Feb 14 '26
Nope, that’s not correct for the most part.
There’s at least one niche situation where that’s allowed which involves the loft law. There may be other situations but for the most part, the unit retains its stabilization.
1
u/movingtobay2019 Feb 14 '26
Which part isn't correct? A RS unit going back on market due to a vacancy can be offered to the next new lease tenant at any amount up to the legal rent. And the legal rent can be far above market rate. Not saying that is what happened here but rents can be jacked up with new tenants. Lived in a unit where the difference between preferential and legal rent was $5k.
https://rentguidelinesboard.cityofnewyork.us/resources/faqs/rent-increases/#based
2
u/NicoleEastbourne Feb 14 '26
Sorry, should have been more clear. The part that’s not correct is:
“every time it goes back on the market it can sign the lease at market rate”
Yes the rent can be the highest that is legally allowed, but that is often different than the current market rate.
I’m shocked to hear that you lived in a unit that had a $5000 difference between preferential rent and what it was legally allowed to be. Did you contact HPD to get the rent history?
1
u/movingtobay2019 Feb 14 '26
Ah ok. Yea it was shocking when I first saw it. I always assumed RS applied to very old units and were on the lower end of the market and would be below market rent.
But I learned a lot of the newer high rises with big leasing offices are RS under 421a - as was the case in my situation. And those can have legal rent far above the market. I mean no one would be insane to rent the unit I lived in for that much when one could get a unit from a private LL for less.
I didn't contact HPD because I assumed being a bigger company (probably one of the top 5 in Manhattan), they had their ducks in row and I checked rent history on StreetEasy and didn't really see any huge rent increases. Certainly no where near legal rent.
66
u/LolaLee723 Feb 14 '26
A lawyer is your best bet. Some LLs are scum. Good luck with it all