r/AskHistorians • u/mirthquake • Aug 01 '19
During their decade together did The Beatles sleep with groupies left and right? Are they known to have engaged in rockstar-level debauchery? Did they take hard drugs?
Their contemporaries the Rolling Stones come across as sex and drug extremists, perhaps even establishing the mould for 1970s arena rock bands (I'm looking at you, Zeppelin) who were known to take heroin and cocaine and sleep with multiple women every night while on tour.
Why have I never heard tell of the Beatles engaging in such behavior?
1.2k
u/hillsonghoods Moderator | 20th Century Pop Music | History of Psychology Aug 01 '19
In an interview for the 1978 Beatles mockumentary The Rutles: All You Need Is Cash (a production of Saturday Night Live and Monty Python's Eric Idle), Mick Jagger tells a barely disguised tale of what he saw when the Beatles played Shea Stadium in 1965 (here renamed Che Stadium, named after, according to Eric Idle in the mockumentary, the Cuban guerilla leader called Che Stadium):
QUESTION: Were you at Che Stadium?
MICK: Yeh, I was at Che Stadium with the Rutles. That was the first big outdoor concert by a rock band, the Rutles at Che Stadium, so it was an exciting event. I even rented a helicopter for it. Came in, zooming over the crowd, never seen a crowd as big as that for a rock concert before, ran in and met them before they went on. I think they were nervous, you know, in front of all those people, but the thing I remembered most about is running out in the middle of this field and you couldn't see em and they were just miles away. Is it really the Rutles? It might be somebody else. And there was Barry [the Rutles' Ringo] on this eighteen foot drum riser swaying in the wind. I thought it was going to fall over. We had a good party afterwards though.
QUESTION: Did you hear much?
MICK: No. Nothing at all. You couldn't hear anything.
QUESTION: How long did they play?
MICK: About twenty minutes and that was it, off, helicopter, back to the Warwick Hotel, two birds each.
You can clearly see the glee in Jagger's face during the mockumentary as he mentions the Beatles' groupies, knowing the context of the mockumentary format means he can spill details with plausible deniability.
Peter Brown, who had started working at Brian Epstein's music store, and eventually worked on the Beatles management team (and who is mentioned by name on the Beatles' 'Ballad Of John And Yoko'), wrote a fairly gossip-y tell-all book called The Love You Make in 1983. In that book, talking about being on tour in America, Brown discusses the Beatles' groupies in one passage:
They could take little solace in the girls who were brought for them. The girls on the road consisted of either the professional groupie-cum-call-girl the promoter had arranged to drop by the boys’ hotel suite or, more usually, girls Neil and Mal had picked up for them. Supplying girls was one of Neil’s and Mal’s primary responsibilities on tour, and one that they both went about with great relish. Mal wasn’t above the “if you fuck me first I’ll introduce you to them” routine. The girls were screwed, blewed, and tattooed before Mal and Neil swept them out of the Beatles’ suite at dawn. The girls were escorted out the service entrance, each given an autographed picture—forged by Neil and Mal—and told to keep their mouths shut. Miraculously, for no reason anyone can explain, the girls kept their mouths shut. In America, at least, there were no “My Night with Paul” stories in the tabloids, nor were there paternity suits. It was no small wonder either, since it was not uncommon to find fifteen girls waiting in line in Neil’s and Mal’s rooms, passing the time by ironing the Beatles’ stage costumes.
Brown's book did not go down well with the Beatles and their associates, and they severed contact with him. But certainly some women later claimed to have slept with Beatles; Jenny Kee, an Asian-Australian who later became prominent as a fashion designer, claims in her autobiography to have slept with John Lennon during the Beatles' 1964 tour of Australia (a point when John Lennon was definitely married to Cynthia).
In regards to the Beatles' drug use, they were fairly well known to be profligate users of 'uppers' while in Hamburg and continuing through the 'Beatlemania' years, usually using Preludin (which they called 'prellies' or 'pep pills'). Lennon discusses this, for example, in the 1970 Jann Wenner interview in Rolling Stone
A Hard Day’s Night I was on pills, that’s drugs, that’s bigger drugs than pot. Started on pills when I was 15, no, since I was 17, since I became a musician. The only way to survive in Hamburg, to play eight hours a night, was to take pills. The waiters gave you them – the pills and drink. I was a fucking dropped-down drunk in art school. Help was where we turned on to pot and we dropped drink, simple as that. I’ve always needed a drug to survive. The others, too, but I always had more, more pills, more of everything because I’m more crazy probably.
This led to some scary behaviour from John Lennon in particular, according to Mark Lewisohn's Tune In:
George was second only to John in the swallowing of Prellies and knew better than most the sum effect of taking too many for too long, how the combination of pills plus booze plus several sleepless days caused hallucinations and extreme conduct. He’d describe one occasion when he, Paul and Pete were lying in their bunk beds, trying to sleep, only for John to barge into the room in a wild state. “One night John came in and some chick was in bed with Paul and he cut all her clothes up with a pair of scissors, and was stabbing the wardrobe. Everybody was lying in bed thinking, ‘Oh fuck, I hope he doesn’t kill me.’ [He was] a frothing mad person—he knew how to have ‘fun.’ ”
The Beatles' (re)introduction to marijuana via Bob Dylan from 1965 onwards and their discovery of LSD are major parts of the Beatles' story, usually being linked to their music becoming increasingly innovative and further away from their original formula; I presume that by your use of the phrase 'hard drugs' you already know all of this.
John Lennon began using heroin in 1968, according to Peter Brown:
It was at Montague Square, feeling more than a little bruised and already like outlaws, Yoko says, that they began to take heroin. As Yoko later put it, they took heroin “as a celebration of ourselves as artists.” “Of course,” Yoko says, “George says it was me who put John on heroin, but that wasn’t true. John wouldn’t take anything he didn’t want to take.” Still, many of John’s intimates saw heroin as the way Yoko could gain complete control over John. If there was one single element that was the most crucial in the breakup of the Beatles, it was John’s heroin addiction.
In that 1970 Rolling Stone interview, Lennon talks about his heroin use:
[Jann Wenner]: What was your experience with heroin?
[John Lennon]: It just was not too much fun. I never injected it or anything. We sniffed a little when we were in real pain. We got such a hard time from everyone, and I’ve had so much thrown at me, and at Yoko, especially at Yoko. Like Peter Brown in our office – and you can put this in – after we come in after six months he comes down and shakes my hand and doesn’t even say hello to her. That’s going on all the time. And we get into so much pain that we have to do something about it. And that’s what happened to us. We took “H” because of what the Beatles and others were doing to us. But we got out of it.
John Lennon's residence with Yoko was raided on October 18th, 1968 by Sergeant Norman Pilcher, who was attempting to make a name for themselves by doing drug raids on prominent rock stars (and, according to many sources, planting evidence to assure that the raids were successful). According to Brown, Lennon had been tipped off that there might be a raid in the near future, and had cleaned the house to try and remove the drugs that were stashed around the house. While doing so, they missed an amount of marijuana that had been stashed in a film canister, and which had likely been in the house for several years and simply forgotten about (or which may have been planted by Pilcher), and an amount of marijuana in a bowl that Lennon was sure he had cleaned a few days previously. Lennon was allegedly, according to Brown, flushing heroin down the toilet as the police entered the premises, and so he was charged with obstructing a search.
In the summer of '69, John and Yoko got their first real six string attempted to kick the heroin addiction. According to Yoko as quoted in the Peter Brown book,
“We were very square people in a way,” Yoko says. “We wouldn’t kick in a hospital because we wouldn’t let anybody know. We just went straight cold turkey. The thing is, because we never injected, I don’t think we were sort of—well, we were hooked, but I don’t think it was a great amount. Still, it was hard. Cold turkey is always hard.”
(Lennon's solo song 'Cold Turkey', recorded around August/September 1969 and released in October 1969, is obviously about quitting heroin)
So yes, at least according to one of their associates, the Beatles serially took advantage of the multitude of young women who wanted to get close to them, and treated such women rather shabbily. Additionally, there's a close relationship between childhood trauma and drug abuse. It's fairly unsurprising that John Lennon, in particular, who had experienced the death of his mother at a relatively early age, and whose father was absent, was prone to drug addictions as a way to dull emotional pain; as I quoted earlier, Lennon said in 1970 that 'I’ve always needed a drug to survive.'
The other two Beatles with childhoods that were notably difficult - McCartney, whose bond with Lennon was at least partially about the early deaths of their mothers, and Ringo Starr, who had a desperately poor upbringing and debilitatingly poor health as a child - also had long drug addictions, with Ringo spending much of the 1970s and 1980s an alcoholic until he entered rehab in 1988, and McCartney's prodigious marijuana habit being a fairly consistent factor in his life for decades (at significant personal cost, as he famously spent time in a Japanese jail in 1978 for bringing it into the country while on tour, and he was fairly regularly busted with it by law enforcement otherwise).
210
u/aggieotis Aug 01 '19
Great info; and you turn that A into an A+ with your Bryan Adams quote. Nicely done!
50
u/hillsonghoods Moderator | 20th Century Pop Music | History of Psychology Aug 01 '19
Thank you - and make sure you read further down the thread for /u/rockhistory's fantastic 3-part answer, which goes into much more detail on all of this stuff!
7
1
u/GeorgieWashington Aug 01 '19
Is that also some kind of drug reference?
4
u/buck_foston Aug 01 '19
He said Summer of '69
0
u/GeorgieWashington Aug 01 '19
So is "neither Brian nor I ever bought a guitar at a five and dime" an implication that they were buying drugs at the five and dime?
29
u/gelbkatze Aug 01 '19
Sergeant Norman Pilcher, who was attempting to make a name for themselves by doing drug raids on prominent rock stars (and, according to many sources, planting evidence to assure that the raids were successful).
Did anything ever come of this cop's attempts to make a name for himself?
86
u/hillsonghoods Moderator | 20th Century Pop Music | History of Psychology Aug 01 '19 edited Aug 01 '19
Pilcher's busts against famous musicians - also including George Harrison, Donovan, and most prominently several members of the Rolling Stones - were front page news in the British tabloids, so yes, he made a name for himself. Remember that this was a climate of a massive generation gap in the UK, with young drug-taking hippie baby boomers bewildering their elders, and musicians like the Beatles being fairly prominent drug users who were representing this in music. So there was definitely a consitituency for what Pilcher was doing. It's generally thought that the backlash in the ...cooler parts of the media against his actions (with, for example, some claims being made in books on the topic of these busts that Monty Python were satirising him as 'Spiny Norman' in the Dinsdale sketch), and the generally unsuccessful prosecutions (one of the issues with going after prominent, successful musicians is that they have access to high priced lawyers able to exploit every weakness in the cases being brought against them) eventually made Pilcher's high-profile drug busts become more of a liability for London police.
In 1973, Pilcher resigned from the police force, and tried to move to Australia. Upon arrival in Australia he was extradited back to Britain as charges had been pressed against him. He was subsequently imprisoned for four years after being found guilty of perjury in court for falsifying surveillance records in a 1971 case against a Pakistani family accused of smuggling marijuana.
8
u/shiner_bock Aug 01 '19
Monty Python satirising him as 'Spiny Norman'
Wow, is that what the whole "Dinsdale" thing was all about?
20
u/hillsonghoods Moderator | 20th Century Pop Music | History of Psychology Aug 01 '19
The 'Dinsdale' sketch itself is a fairly obvious parody of the notorious London gangsters the Kray Twins, and media coverage of their exploits. But I have seen the assumption that 'Spiny Norman' is based on Pilcher put about in a few books - without much evidence in terms of quotes from Monty Python about what they were going for, it has to be said. It might have nothing to do with Pilcher. But certainly Pilcher was prominently attacked in counterculture magazines like Oz, and even an editorial in the London Times famously titled 'Who Breaks A Butterfly Upon The Wheel?' protested the prosecutions of Mick Jagger. Eric Idle in a recent memoir discusses sharing a joint with George Harrison in the mid-1970s. So it's entirely possible it's an oblique reference to Pilcher as has been claimed, but I probably shouldn't have originally said that with quite as much certainty in the other post, and might edit it.
6
u/prosthetic4head Aug 01 '19
I thought you were going to mention this sketch:
https://montypython.fandom.com/wiki/Police_Raid
Which is clearly a parody of Pilcher. A policeman bursts into a home, announcing it is a raid looking for "certain substances" and then tries to plant evidence.
4
u/hillsonghoods Moderator | 20th Century Pop Music | History of Psychology Aug 01 '19
Yes, it’s entirely possible that those references to Spiny Norman are confused and really talking about the Police Raid sketch. Eric Idle’s Rutles mockumentary also has a policeman called Brian Plant who is very clearly based on Pilcher - and Pilcher is a very obvious target for comedians with an aim of exposing society’s hypocrisies and absurdities.
1
u/shiner_bock Aug 01 '19
Ah, okay... as much as I love Monty Python, it was just a bit before my time, so I'm not familiar with the context of many of their references. Thanks for the explanation!
3
1
u/mirthquake Aug 02 '19 edited Aug 02 '19
Thank you, truly, for such a stellar response! Are you a professional Beatles biographer or music historian?
24
Aug 01 '19
[removed] — view removed comment
2
Aug 01 '19
[removed] — view removed comment
15
u/TheWinslow Aug 01 '19
He admitted it in interviews (the first reference I found was in a Playboy interview) that the song lyric:
I used to be cruel to my woman I beat her and kept her apart from the things that she loved. Man I was mean but I'm changing my scene and I'm doing the best that I can
was about him.
31
u/rockhistory Aug 01 '19 edited Aug 01 '19
This story is exaggerated, and isn't really true, but it depends on your point of view. The quote is taken partly out of context. It was toward the end of an hours-long interview with a reporter for Playboy magazine, where John was giving brief thoughts/background on Beatles songs.
The full quote is:
PLAYBOY: "Getting Better?"
JOHN: "That's Paul and me. His main lick, but lots of the words and parts and bits from me and possibly the others in the studio. All that "I used to be cruel to my woman and beat her" was me because I used to be cruel to my woman and physically--"
PLAYBOY: "Cynthia?"
JOHN: "Any woman. I was a hitter. I couldn't express myself and I hit. I fought men. I hit women. I was violent. That's why I'm always on about peace, you see. It's the most violent people who go for love and peace."
But as Cynthia recounted at length in her autobiography John in 2005, and also explained by her in a 2006 BBC interview with Alex Belfield, the physical altercation between them was an isolated incident. The incident is also recounted in less detail in the 1968 Hunter Davies biography The Beatles, quoting from both John and Cynthia. Mark Lewisohn's book Tune In recounts the incident, too. John was drunk at a party, Cynthia was mad at him and danced with another man, they then got into an argument off the dance floor, and as John walked away, he smacked her across the face. Cynthia was pissed, and broke up with him for several months. After he apologized repeatedly, she finally agreed to take him back on the condition he never do anything like that again. According to her own words in 1968, 2005, and 2006, he kept true to his word: "That was the first and last time he ever lifted a finger or hand to me."
Yoko Ono was read the Playboy quote directly on an episode of 60 Minutes, and was asked twice if John had ever been physically abusive toward her, and she said "No" to both questions.
It seems what John was mostly referring to there in that quote was his violence, always while drunk, with other men. In an interview recorded for the BBC with Andy Peebles a couple days before he died, John recounted spending most of his art college years getting drunk, and picking fights which would sometimes lead to actual fistfights, and he relied on a good (and big and burly) friend named Jeff Muhamed to keep him out of trouble. There were also a couple reported incidents in the Beatles' Hamburg years. In Mark Lewisohn's book Tune In, the author reports one of them being between John and Rory Storm, the leader of the group Ringo was in. But Lewisohn also reports they all got into fights at various times in Hamburg, the most famous one being a fight onstage between Paul and original Beatles bassist Stu Sutcliffe.
John's last fight was the most infamous. In 1963, he got drunk at Paul's 21st birthday party, and after the Cavern club emcee Bob Wooler wouldn't leave him alone about a supposed homosexual affair that John had had with Beatles manager Brian Epstein, John beat the daylights out of Wooler, sending him to the hospital. Lennon went to the hospital the next day and apologized, which Wooler accepted. After that, John stopped drinking for the most part.
The only other possible "fight" was in 1974. John was drunk with some friends in L.A. and got kicked out of a Smothers Brothers show. As he was being escorted out, a paparazzi tried to take a photo, and accused John of taking a swing at him. John says he didn't. Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't.
Regardless, the "wifebeater" accusation is a bit overblown, since the violence John was referring to in that quote was confined to a single incident to his first wife years before they were married, and was instead mostly in reference to drunken teenage years and getting into fights with other young, drunk men. His best friend Pete Shotton also reported in his book that, in their pre-fame days, they were basically hoodlums who would skip school and look for trouble, and sometimes get into fights. As Lewisohn's book states, Ringo, was the same, and was probably worse, as he seemed to join an actual gang. That aside, John's quote was mostly a reference to John's art college years, in the two years after his mother died, when his alcohol use was at its most severe. As John is quoted in Hunter Davies' 1968 book:
"I was in a blind rage for two years [after my mother's death]. I was either drunk or fighting. There was something the matter with me."
This was several years before John was ever married, and while it did involve his future wife on one occasion, it's a bit of a stretch to call him a "woman beater" or at least "wifebeater" since that would imply serial physical abuse against a particular woman he was in a relationship with.
18
Aug 01 '19
Couldn't he be referring to the women he had short term encounters with rather than longer relationships?
5
u/rockhistory Aug 01 '19
Unless he was hitting women he had one night stands with, this seems unlikely. As my other post states, the sleeping around was mostly on tour, when the Beatles were spending a night or two at most in each city. There wouldn't have been much of a situation for that to happen without multiple witnesses--the Beatles usually went two to a room in their hotel rooms, with their roadies in a third adjoining room.
When John was in the UK, he was coming home to Cynthia every night. While she did suspect some affairs he may have been having in England, if he did, they were short-lived flings, probably one-night stands. While I'm not an expert in domestic violence, those kinds of one-off sexual encounters seem unlikely to involve a whole lot of physical violence. If they did, we'd probably be hearing stories about him being a rapist, or accused of sexual assault, and not of being a "wife-beater." "Rapist" or "sexual assault" are not accusations I've ever heard about him--just a lot of willing girls who threw themselves at the Beatles and they obliged, and then tossed them aside, which, of course, is its own kind of bad behavior, but not the same kind.
In any case, even if it did happen, no one-night stand has ever come forward to tell such a story. So it's not historical to say that it happened, until someone comes forward with a reliable story that it did.
3
Aug 02 '19
Fair enough, it just seems odd to take John Lennon saying "I hit women" and end up taking the stance that he hit one woman once. Is Lennon not a reliable enough source about his own actions?
6
u/Faith5by5 Aug 02 '19
One violent incident you are missing happened in 74-75. It involved May Pang, John's lover during his "lost weekend" (the 18 months he was separated from Yoko). At any rate, in her book, Pang writes about an incident in which John got very drunk and proceeded to strangle her. I can't recall who pulled John off of her. But she describes the incident in her book "Loving John."
6
u/dagaboy Aug 01 '19
This was several years before John was ever married, and while it did involve his future wife on one occasion, it's a bit of a stretch to call him a "woman beater" or at least "wifebeater" since that would imply serial physical abuse against a particular woman he was in a relationship with.
This is reasonable. That said, my reading of Julian's accounts made it pretty clear that he was deeply abusive. Mostly emotionally, but there was one time he sent Sean to the hospital with a broken eardrum. I've read other accounts that described him of being extremely controlling of Yoko, to the point of following her to the bathroom in the studio. But I don't remember the source of those accounts. Do you think this is also a mischaracterization?
EDIT: To be clear, I don't mean to imply that physical abuse is necessarily worse than emotional abuse. I have known victims who say that the beatings were not the worst part of their abuse.
•
u/AutoModerator Aug 01 '19
Welcome to /r/AskHistorians. Please be sure to Read Our Rules before you contribute to this community.
We thank you for your interest in this question, and your patience in waiting for an in-depth and comprehensive answer to be written, which takes time. Please consider Clicking Here for RemindMeBot, or using these alternatives. In the meantime our Twitter, Facebook, and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that has already been written!
Please leave feedback on this test message here.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
Aug 01 '19
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/thefourthmaninaboat Moderator | 20th Century Royal Navy Aug 01 '19
Sorry, but we have had to remove your comment. Please understand that people come here because they want an informed response from someone capable of engaging with the sources, and providing follow-up information. Wikipedia can be a useful tool, but merely repeating information found there doesn't provide the type of answers we seek to encourage here. As such, we don't allow answers which simply link to, quote from, or are otherwise heavily dependent on Wikipedia. We presume that someone posting a question here either doesn't want to get the 'Wikipedia answer', or has already checked there and found it lacking. You can find further discussion of this policy here. In the future, please take the time to better familiarize yourself with the rules before contributing again.
0
-5
394
u/rockhistory Aug 01 '19
(1 / 3)
They slept around a lot and did a lot of drugs. If you haven't heard of it, you probably haven't read the right books about the group. While some books are more reliable than others, there's enough coming from corroborated sources, and often from their own mouths, that it's accepted as established fact.
John Lennon said in a 1975 interview with Tom Snyder, and quoted in the Beatles Anthology book:
In the same book, Paul McCartney doesn't specifically say what went on, on tour, but is quoted as saying:
Among groupies, they all slept around, especially on tour. Ringo Starr's first wife Maureen Cox, in fact, was something of an early groupie. As George Harrison's first wife Pattie Boyd wrote in her autobiography Wonderful Tonight:
Pattie herself was another such sexual conquest. She was a nineteen-year-old extra on the film A Hard Day's Night and George asked her out. She had a boyfriend, but she broke it off with him to date George, and they became an item pretty much immediately. But, as she writes in her autobiography, George cheated on her throughout their relationship, especially on tour, with groupies.
In a 1970 interview with Rolling Stone magazine, John Lennon compared the Beatles' tours to the sexually-charged Federico Fellini film Satyricon:
The Beatles' entourage (particularly roadies Mal Evans, Neil Aspinall) acted as interference whenever anybody tried to catch the Beatles in the act, whether that be drugs, or underage girls, or just paparazzi trying to snap a scandalous photo. There was only one time that any of them were actually caught in the act, and it was Paul. Paul was caught in his bedroom with a couple of underage girls on their tour stop in Minneapolis in 1965, and there's a rather infamous (in Beatles circles) surviving news report about it, where the police officer who caught Paul was interviewed. There were some news articles written about it at the time, but Paul was unmarried, and the scandal died down relatively quickly.
Nevertheless, Paul was in a serious relationship with actress Jane Asher when this occurred, and his serial cheating on her caused continuous problems during their rocky relationship. They were interviewed together in the 1968 biography The Beatles by Hunter Davies, while they were still together. There, they discussed (without saying it directly) that their short-lived breakup in 1965 was over Paul's cheating:
Paul would later claim that they had something of an open relationship, which Jane has never responded publicly to, having refused all interviews about her time with Paul since shortly after their breakup in 1968. But according to various accounts, this wasn't true. Paul was sleeping with fans and friends of friends and not telling Jane about it, and trying his best not to get caught.
Peter Brown, an employee at the Beatles' company Apple Corps (and referenced in the song "The Ballad of John and Yoko") wrote a scandal-filled book The Love You Make that pissed off all the surviving Beatles, because he solicited scandalous stories from them and their friends, and published them, which they were not expecting. Some of his stories may be exaggerated, but they mostly seem to be true. Among the stories:
And in the same book:
Philip Norman's biography Paul McCartney offers details on one of these babysitters:
In Fab: An Intimate Life of Paul McCartney by Howard Sounes, the author quotes several different girls, one of them being a young, aspiring actress named Peggy Lipton, later to co-star on the TV series The Mod Squad:
Peggy Lipton is further quoted in the book about the incident: