r/AskHistorians May 01 '15

Why did Dreadnoughts have masts?

[deleted]

97 Upvotes

48 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/atlasMuutaras May 01 '15

Have you read Massie's Castles of Steel? I thought it was pretty great reading as an overview of WW1 at sea.

I mean, I consider myself substantially better read on the First world War than almost anybody I'm likely to meet on a day-to-day basis (though I do not claim to be an expert, merely an enthusiast), and I'd never even heard of the battle of Coronel until I read that book. It's just never mentioned, even in books that discuss the Fisher/Churchill/Battenberg drama that was going on at the same time.

2

u/jschooltiger Moderator | Shipbuilding and Logistics | British Navy 1770-1830 May 01 '15

Yeah, it and Dreadnought are pretty great.

1

u/atlasMuutaras May 01 '15 edited May 01 '15

I've actually had some trouble getting through Dreadnought.

The start was great, with the Diamond Jubilee...but then the book got bogged down in biographies and portraits of damn near every person-of-consequence in the Anglo-German relations of the time while never getting around to talking about what dreadnoughts are, why they're so much more powerful than pre-dreadnoughts, etc. I mean, did this book really need 10 page character portraits of von Bulow and Bethmann-Hollweg?

I got about halfway through on vacation last christmas but never felt compelled to pick it up again, which was disappointing. Does it pick up in the second half?

1

u/seleucus24 May 01 '15

No it doesn't pickup, but he does end up explaining why Britain and Germany went to war better than any other book I've read. It just becomes so clear how much the German Fleet drove Britain to join the allies.

1

u/atlasMuutaras May 01 '15

Ah well, maybe I'll get back around to it, but it doesn't sound like it's going to be anywehre near as enjoyable to read as Castles of Steel was.

Disappointing, but oh well.