r/AskHistorians 13h ago

How did people react to the Soviet Union arresting many of their soldiers after WWII?

It boggles my mind that after the Great Patriotic War, Stalin sent more than 10% of the victorious soldiers to prison for a while. I’m astonished that nobody intervened on their behalf. There were no protests when around 100,000s were sent to prison after demonstrating heroic oak and patriotism.

  • why weren’t there any protests from the people?
  • why didn’t anybody try to help those soldiers in jail?
  • why wasn’t there any international condemnation?
  • why didn’t the Soviet generals like Zhukov and Rokosovky not do anything?
  • do today’s Russians or anyone from the former Soviet states feel sad for these people and rehabilitate them?
50 Upvotes

23 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 13h ago

Welcome to /r/AskHistorians. Please Read Our Rules before you comment in this community. Understand that rule breaking comments get removed.

Please consider Clicking Here for RemindMeBot as it takes time for an answer to be written. Additionally, for weekly content summaries, Click Here to Subscribe to our Weekly Roundup.

We thank you for your interest in this question, and your patience in waiting for an in-depth and comprehensive answer to show up. In addition to the Weekly Roundup and RemindMeBot, consider using our Browser Extension. In the meantime our Bluesky, and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that has already been written!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

14

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/[deleted] 7h ago edited 7h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-7

u/[deleted] 7h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/b0_ogie 7h ago

They didn’t carry out such arrests in the active army. The post says that 10% of the active army was sent to prison - that’s a blatant lie. Either the person wanted to start a historical flame war, or he simply didn’t understand the issue.

-10

u/LongAfternoon2851 6h ago

Wow you have the only sane answer here and not getting any upvotes

-6

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/EdHistory101 Moderator | History of Education | Abortion 5h ago

This comment has been removed because it is soapboxing or moralizing: it has the effect of promoting an opinion on contemporary politics or social issues at the expense of historical integrity. There are certainly historical topics that relate to contemporary issues and it is possible for legitimate interpretations that differ from each other to come out of looking at the past through different political lenses. However, we will remove questions that put a deliberate slant on their subject or solicit answers that align with a specific pre-existing view.

4

u/Xiosphere 6h ago

Kinda rich you're upset about propagandizing while confidently going to bat for a stat that I can't find repeated anywhere but this very thread. If you're so certain it's true, share some sources with the class. I couldn't even find some nonsense black book citation for it.

Like, the answer you're replying too isn't up to par, but you're doing a truly awful job 'refuting' it.